Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ | $65.50 | +3.31% | 16.3B | 55.89 | $1.17 | +5.88% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.95 | $1.34 | +2.50% |
| FUBO | $9.22 | +3.60% | 1B | 2.40 | $3.84 | N/A |
| EVC | $9.86 | +4.89% | 907.5M | -49.30 | -$0.20 | +2.03% |
| NMAX | $7.78 | +3.73% | 699.6M | -15.88 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| IHRT | $3.59 | -4.01% | 466.9M | -1.96 | -$1.83 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $6.90 | -15.54% | 391.3M | -4.54 | -$1.52 | +8.44% |
Stock Comparison
CCZ vs LSXMK Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMK's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMA Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMA's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMB Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMB's competition here
CCZ vs TGNA Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while TGNA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check TGNA's competition here
CCZ vs FUBO Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while FUBO trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FUBO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check FUBO's competition here
CCZ vs EVC Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 907.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while EVC trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check EVC's competition here
CCZ vs NMAX Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 699.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while NMAX trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check NMAX's competition here
CCZ vs IHRT Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while IHRT trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check IHRT's competition here
CCZ vs GTN-A Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while GTN-A trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check GTN-A's competition here
CCZ vs GTN Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 389.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while GTN trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check GTN's competition here
CCZ vs SSP Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while SSP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SSP's competition here
CCZ vs CURI Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while CURI trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CURI's competition here
CCZ vs SGA Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while SGA trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SGA's competition here
CCZ vs BBGI Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while BBGI trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check BBGI's competition here
CCZ vs MDIA Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while MDIA trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check MDIA's competition here
CCZ vs SJ Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while SJ trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SJ's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SJ's competition here
CCZ vs UONEK Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while UONEK trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONEK's competition here
CCZ vs AUD Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUD's ROE of +32.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check AUD's competition here
CCZ vs UONE Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while UONE trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UONE's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONE's competition here
CCZ vs XHLD Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while XHLD trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check XHLD's competition here
CCZ vs CURIW Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CURIW's competition here
CCZ vs DISCA Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check DISCA's competition here
CCZ vs QVCC Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while QVCC trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCC's competition here
CCZ vs QVCD Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while QVCD trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCD's competition here
CCZ vs EMMSP Comparison June 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16.3B. In comparison, EMMSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $65.50, while EMMSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 55.89, whereas EMMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMMSP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EMMSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check EMMSP's competition here