T1 Energy Inc
T1 Energy Inc (TE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TE | $1.34 | -4.29% | 209M | -3.27 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $142.70 | +0.11% | 54.4B | 82.99 | $1.72 | +0.10% |
| HUBB | $427.33 | -2.51% | 22.8B | 28.93 | $14.77 | +1.22% |
| NVT | $79.72 | +0.82% | 13.1B | 55.36 | $1.44 | +0.99% |
| AYI | $310.82 | -0.54% | 9.5B | 24.52 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $34.75 | -0.09% | 8.1B | 1737.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $142.21 | +0.19% | 5.4B | 71.11 | $2.00 | +0.28% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | N/A |
| ENS | $93.58 | -0.06% | 3.6B | 10.41 | $8.99 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
TE vs ABB Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ABB's competition here
TE vs VRT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while VRT trades at $142.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 82.99. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check VRT's competition here
TE vs HUBB Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while HUBB trades at $427.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HUBB's competition here
TE vs NVT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while NVT trades at $79.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 55.36. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NVT's competition here
TE vs AYI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while AYI trades at $310.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AYI's competition here
TE vs BE Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while BE trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1737.50. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check BE's competition here
TE vs AEIS Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while AEIS trades at $142.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 71.11. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AEIS's competition here
TE vs WIRE Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check WIRE's competition here
TE vs ENS Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ENS trades at $93.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENS's competition here
TE vs HAYW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while HAYW trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HAYW's competition here
TE vs POWL Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while POWL trades at $233.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check POWL's competition here
TE vs ENVX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ENVX trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENVX's competition here
TE vs ATKR Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ATKR trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ATKR's competition here
TE vs PLUG Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while PLUG trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PLUG's competition here
TE vs ENR Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ENR trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENR's competition here
TE vs HOLI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HOLI's competition here
TE vs EOSEW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while EOSEW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EOSEW's competition here
TE vs EOSE Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while EOSE trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EOSE's competition here
TE vs MVST Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while MVST trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check MVST's competition here
TE vs AMPX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 861.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while AMPX trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -17.01. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AMPX's competition here
TE vs AMPX-WT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 816.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while AMPX-WT trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
TE vs PLPC Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 705.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while PLPC trades at $142.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PLPC's competition here
TE vs ADSE Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 660.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ADSE trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ADSE's competition here
TE vs SLDP Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 579.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SLDP trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SLDP's competition here
TE vs KE Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while KE trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check KE's competition here
TE vs SES-WT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SES-WT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SES-WT's competition here
TE vs EAF Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 393.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while EAF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to EAF's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EAF's competition here
TE vs LTBR Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while LTBR trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check LTBR's competition here
TE vs AIRJ Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while AIRJ trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AIRJ's competition here
TE vs FREY Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FREY's competition here
TE vs TGEN Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while TGEN trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -41.28. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check TGEN's competition here
TE vs NVX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 215.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while NVX trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NVX's competition here
TE vs ELVA Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ELVA trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -124.75. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ELVA's competition here
TE vs ELPW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ELPW trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ELPW's competition here
TE vs NEOV Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 172.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while NEOV trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -38.92. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NEOV's competition here
TE vs ULBI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ULBI trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ULBI's competition here
TE vs ESP Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ESP trades at $47.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ESP's competition here
TE vs SVT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SVT's competition here
TE vs FCEL Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while FCEL trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FCEL's competition here
TE vs SKYX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SKYX trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SKYX's competition here
TE vs OPTT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while OPTT trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check OPTT's competition here
TE vs SLDPW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SLDPW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SLDPW's competition here
TE vs CBAT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while CBAT trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check CBAT's competition here
TE vs MVSTW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while MVSTW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check MVSTW's competition here
TE vs RFIL Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while RFIL trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -55.07. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check RFIL's competition here
TE vs ADSEW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ADSEW trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ADSEW's competition here
TE vs NEOVW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while NEOVW trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NEOVW's competition here
TE vs CHEV Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while CHEV trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check CHEV's competition here
TE vs IPWR Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while IPWR trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check IPWR's competition here
TE vs SDSTW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SDSTW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SDSTW's competition here
TE vs SDST Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while SDST trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SDST's competition here
TE vs APWC Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while APWC trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check APWC's competition here
TE vs PPSI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while PPSI trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PPSI's competition here
TE vs FLUX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while FLUX trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FLUX's competition here
TE vs GWH Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while GWH trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check GWH's competition here
TE vs GWH-WT Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check GWH-WT's competition here
TE vs OESX Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while OESX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check OESX's competition here
TE vs DFLI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while DFLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DFLI's competition here
TE vs CCTG Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while CCTG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check CCTG's competition here
TE vs DFLIW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while DFLIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DFLIW's competition here
TE vs PITA Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PITA's competition here
TE vs STI Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while STI trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check STI's competition here
TE vs NXU Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NXU's competition here
TE vs POLA Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while POLA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check POLA's competition here
TE vs RAYA Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while RAYA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check RAYA's competition here
TE vs XPON Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while XPON trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check XPON's competition here
TE vs DCFC Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DCFC's competition here
TE vs DCFCW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DCFCW's competition here
TE vs ENR-PA Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENR-PA's competition here
TE vs BLNKW Comparison July 2025
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 209M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $1.34, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.17%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check BLNKW's competition here