ToughBuilt Industries, Inc. WT EXP 110923 (TBLTW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TBLTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBLTW | $0.01 | +1.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SNA | $387.48 | +0.73% | 20.1B | 19.99 | $19.39 | +2.45% |
| RBC | $603.64 | -0.63% | 19.1B | 66.25 | $9.11 | N/A |
| LECO | $258.25 | +0.19% | 14.1B | 26.62 | $9.70 | +1.19% |
| SWK | $83.62 | +0.59% | 13B | 34.26 | $2.44 | +3.96% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $137.06 | -0.25% | 9.5B | 31.13 | $4.40 | +1.04% |
| TTC | $90.74 | -1.59% | 8.6B | 26.15 | $3.47 | +1.70% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TBLTW vs SNA Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SNA trades at $387.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SNA's competition here
TBLTW vs RBC Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while RBC trades at $603.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 66.25. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check RBC's competition here
TBLTW vs LECO Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while LECO trades at $258.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check LECO's competition here
TBLTW vs SWK Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SWK trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SWK's competition here
TBLTW vs SWH Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SWH's competition here
TBLTW vs ROLLP Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check ROLLP's competition here
TBLTW vs TKR Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while TKR trades at $137.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check TKR's competition here
TBLTW vs TTC Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while TTC trades at $90.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check TTC's competition here
TBLTW vs ROLL Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check ROLL's competition here
TBLTW vs RBCP Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check RBCP's competition here
TBLTW vs KMT Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while KMT trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check KMT's competition here
TBLTW vs HLMN Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while HLMN trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check HLMN's competition here
TBLTW vs EML Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while EML trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check EML's competition here
TBLTW vs SCX Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SCX's competition here
TBLTW vs PFIN Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check PFIN's competition here
TBLTW vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SCAG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SCAG's competition here
TBLTW vs CVR Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while CVR trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check CVR's competition here
TBLTW vs HDNG Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check HDNG's competition here
TBLTW vs SWT Comparison June 2026
TBLTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBLTW stands at 0. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBLTW is priced at $0.01, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBLTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBLTW's ROE is -4.65%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBLTW is more volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBLTW.Check SWT's competition here