Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMN | $7.74 | -1.15% | 1.5B | 43.00 | $0.18 | N/A |
| RBC | $625.73 | +0.75% | 19.8B | 68.63 | $9.11 | N/A |
| SNA | $381.26 | -2.09% | 19.7B | 19.67 | $19.37 | +2.47% |
| LECO | $269.57 | -1.45% | 14.8B | 27.79 | $9.70 | +1.13% |
| SWK | $82.47 | -2.54% | 12.8B | 33.80 | $2.44 | +3.97% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $139.40 | -0.63% | 9.7B | 31.70 | $4.40 | +1.00% |
| TTC | $90.87 | +0.17% | 8.7B | 26.20 | $3.47 | +1.70% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLMN vs RBC Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while RBC trades at $625.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check RBC's competition here
HLMN vs SNA Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SNA trades at $381.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SNA's competition here
HLMN vs LECO Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while LECO trades at $269.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check LECO's competition here
HLMN vs SWK Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SWK trades at $82.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SWK's competition here
HLMN vs SWH Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SWH's competition here
HLMN vs ROLLP Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check ROLLP's competition here
HLMN vs TKR Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while TKR trades at $139.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TKR's competition here
HLMN vs TTC Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while TTC trades at $90.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TTC's competition here
HLMN vs ROLL Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check ROLL's competition here
HLMN vs RBCP Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check RBCP's competition here
HLMN vs KMT Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while KMT trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check KMT's competition here
HLMN vs EML Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 132.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while EML trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check EML's competition here
HLMN vs SCX Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SCX's competition here
HLMN vs PFIN Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check PFIN's competition here
HLMN vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SCAG trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SCAG's competition here
HLMN vs CVR Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while CVR trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check CVR's competition here
HLMN vs HDNG Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check HDNG's competition here
HLMN vs SWT Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SWT's competition here
HLMN vs TBLTW Comparison June 2026
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $7.74, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TBLTW's competition here