Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| SNA | $366.65 | +1.20% | 19B | 18.94 | $19.36 | +2.58% |
| RBC | $559.95 | -1.24% | 17.7B | 61.74 | $9.07 | N/A |
| LECO | $263.43 | +1.29% | 14.4B | 27.19 | $9.69 | +1.17% |
| SWK | $76.46 | +1.22% | 11.9B | 31.34 | $2.44 | +4.33% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TTC | $90.80 | +1.06% | 8.9B | 27.19 | $3.34 | +1.70% |
| TKR | $119.95 | +0.86% | 8.3B | 27.26 | $4.40 | +1.18% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
| RBCP | $123.98 | +0.38% | 3.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SWH vs SNA Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while SNA trades at $366.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check SNA's competition here
SWH vs RBC Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while RBC trades at $559.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 61.74. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check RBC's competition here
SWH vs LECO Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while LECO trades at $263.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check LECO's competition here
SWH vs SWK Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while SWK trades at $76.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check SWK's competition here
SWH vs ROLLP Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check ROLLP's competition here
SWH vs TTC Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while TTC trades at $90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check TTC's competition here
SWH vs TKR Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while TKR trades at $119.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check TKR's competition here
SWH vs ROLL Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check ROLL's competition here
SWH vs RBCP Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check RBCP's competition here
SWH vs KMT Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while KMT trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check KMT's competition here
SWH vs HLMN Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while HLMN trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check HLMN's competition here
SWH vs EML Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while EML trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check EML's competition here
SWH vs SCX Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check SCX's competition here
SWH vs PFIN Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check PFIN's competition here
SWH vs SCAG Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while SCAG trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check SCAG's competition here
SWH vs CVR Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while CVR trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check CVR's competition here
SWH vs TBLT Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 577. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while TBLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check TBLT's competition here
SWH vs HDNG Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check HDNG's competition here
SWH vs TBLTW Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check TBLTW's competition here
SWH vs SWT Comparison May 2026
SWH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWH stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWH is priced at $124.86, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.57, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWH is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWH.Check SWT's competition here