Stanley Black & Decker Inc (SWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWT | $51.06 | -2.87% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +10.28% |
| SNA | $401.11 | -1.87% | 20.8B | 21.06 | $19.06 | +2.36% |
| RBC | $593.89 | -1.06% | 18.8B | 47.92 | $12.38 | N/A |
| LECO | $247.69 | -3.17% | 13.6B | 24.24 | $10.22 | +1.26% |
| SWK | $86.15 | -3.60% | 13.4B | 18.26 | $4.72 | +3.85% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $137.23 | -0.60% | 9.5B | 24.50 | $5.60 | +1.03% |
| TTC | $92.70 | -2.04% | 8.8B | 20.64 | $4.49 | +1.67% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SWT vs SNA Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while SNA trades at $401.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check SNA's competition here
SWT vs RBC Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while RBC trades at $593.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 47.92. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check RBC's competition here
SWT vs LECO Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while LECO trades at $247.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check LECO's competition here
SWT vs SWK Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while SWK trades at $86.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check SWK's competition here
SWT vs SWH Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check SWH's competition here
SWT vs ROLLP Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check ROLLP's competition here
SWT vs TKR Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while TKR trades at $137.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check TKR's competition here
SWT vs TTC Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while TTC trades at $92.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check TTC's competition here
SWT vs ROLL Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check ROLL's competition here
SWT vs RBCP Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check RBCP's competition here
SWT vs KMT Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while KMT trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check KMT's competition here
SWT vs HLMN Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while HLMN trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check HLMN's competition here
SWT vs EML Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while EML trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is less volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check EML's competition here
SWT vs SCX Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check SCX's competition here
SWT vs PFIN Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check PFIN's competition here
SWT vs CVR Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while CVR trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check CVR's competition here
SWT vs TBLTW Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check TBLTW's competition here
SWT vs HDNG Comparison July 2026
SWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWT stands at 0. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWT is priced at $51.06, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, SWT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWT is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWT.Check HDNG's competition here