The Eastern Company (EML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $23.68 | +8.03% | 142.8M | 30.36 | $0.78 | +1.88% |
| RBC | $639.18 | +2.15% | 20.2B | 70.49 | $9.07 | N/A |
| SNA | $387.25 | +1.57% | 20.1B | 20.00 | $19.37 | +2.45% |
| LECO | $275.23 | +2.10% | 15.1B | 28.43 | $9.68 | +1.12% |
| SWK | $86.75 | +5.19% | 13.5B | 35.56 | $2.44 | +3.83% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $142.36 | +2.12% | 9.9B | 32.27 | $4.40 | +0.99% |
| TTC | $92.61 | +1.91% | 8.8B | 26.69 | $3.47 | +1.67% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EML vs RBC Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while RBC trades at $639.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 70.49. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBC's competition here
EML vs SNA Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SNA trades at $387.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SNA's competition here
EML vs LECO Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while LECO trades at $275.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check LECO's competition here
EML vs SWK Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SWK trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWK's competition here
EML vs SWH Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWH's competition here
EML vs ROLLP Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLLP's competition here
EML vs TKR Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while TKR trades at $142.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TKR's competition here
EML vs TTC Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while TTC trades at $92.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TTC's competition here
EML vs ROLL Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLL's competition here
EML vs RBCP Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBCP's competition here
EML vs KMT Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while KMT trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check KMT's competition here
EML vs HLMN Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while HLMN trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HLMN's competition here
EML vs SCX Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCX's competition here
EML vs PFIN Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check PFIN's competition here
EML vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SCAG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCAG's competition here
EML vs CVR Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while CVR trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check CVR's competition here
EML vs HDNG Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HDNG's competition here
EML vs SWT Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWT's competition here
EML vs TBLTW Comparison June 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 142.8M. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.68, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 30.36, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLTW's competition here