The Eastern Company (EML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $29.11 | -0.94% | 175.6M | 25.99 | $1.12 | +1.51% |
| SNA | $412.09 | +2.18% | 21.3B | 21.62 | $19.06 | +2.30% |
| RBC | $604.56 | -2.56% | 19.1B | 48.83 | $12.38 | N/A |
| SWK | $91.90 | +0.61% | 14.3B | 19.47 | $4.72 | +3.61% |
| LECO | $258.43 | +0.18% | 14.2B | 25.29 | $10.22 | +1.21% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $139.16 | -1.83% | 9.7B | 24.85 | $5.60 | +1.01% |
| TTC | $97.08 | +0.10% | 9.2B | 21.62 | $4.49 | +1.60% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EML vs SNA Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while SNA trades at $412.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SNA's competition here
EML vs RBC Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while RBC trades at $604.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBC's competition here
EML vs SWK Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while SWK trades at $91.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWK's competition here
EML vs LECO Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while LECO trades at $258.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check LECO's competition here
EML vs SWH Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWH's competition here
EML vs ROLLP Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLLP's competition here
EML vs TKR Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while TKR trades at $139.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TKR's competition here
EML vs TTC Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while TTC trades at $97.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TTC's competition here
EML vs ROLL Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLL's competition here
EML vs RBCP Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBCP's competition here
EML vs KMT Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while KMT trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check KMT's competition here
EML vs HLMN Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while HLMN trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HLMN's competition here
EML vs SCX Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCX's competition here
EML vs PFIN Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check PFIN's competition here
EML vs CVR Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while CVR trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check CVR's competition here
EML vs TBLTW Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLTW's competition here
EML vs SWT Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWT's competition here
EML vs HDNG Comparison July 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 175.6M. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $29.11, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 25.99, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HDNG's competition here