The Eastern Company
The Eastern Company (EML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $21.04 | +0.10% | 126.9M | 26.97 | $0.78 | +2.09% |
| SNA | $366.65 | +1.20% | 19B | 18.94 | $19.36 | +2.58% |
| RBC | $559.95 | -1.24% | 17.7B | 61.74 | $9.07 | N/A |
| LECO | $263.43 | +1.29% | 14.4B | 27.19 | $9.69 | +1.17% |
| SWK | $76.46 | +1.22% | 11.9B | 31.34 | $2.44 | +4.33% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TTC | $90.80 | +1.06% | 8.9B | 27.19 | $3.34 | +1.70% |
| TKR | $119.95 | +0.86% | 8.3B | 27.26 | $4.40 | +1.18% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EML vs SNA Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SNA trades at $366.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SNA's competition here
EML vs RBC Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while RBC trades at $559.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 61.74. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBC's competition here
EML vs LECO Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while LECO trades at $263.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check LECO's competition here
EML vs SWK Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SWK trades at $76.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWK's competition here
EML vs SWH Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWH's competition here
EML vs ROLLP Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLLP's competition here
EML vs TTC Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while TTC trades at $90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TTC's competition here
EML vs TKR Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while TKR trades at $119.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TKR's competition here
EML vs ROLL Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLL's competition here
EML vs RBCP Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBCP's competition here
EML vs KMT Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while KMT trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check KMT's competition here
EML vs HLMN Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while HLMN trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HLMN's competition here
EML vs SCX Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCX's competition here
EML vs PFIN Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check PFIN's competition here
EML vs SCAG Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SCAG trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCAG's competition here
EML vs CVR Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while CVR trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check CVR's competition here
EML vs TBLT Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 577. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while TBLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLT's competition here
EML vs SWT Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWT's competition here
EML vs HDNG Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HDNG's competition here
EML vs TBLTW Comparison May 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 126.9M. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $21.04, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 26.97, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLTW's competition here