Kennametal Inc. (KMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while RBC trades at $625.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBC's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SNA trades at $381.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SNA's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while LECO trades at $269.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check LECO's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SWK trades at $82.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWK's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SWH trades at $124.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWH's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLLP's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while TKR trades at $139.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TKR's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while TTC trades at $90.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TTC's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while ROLL trades at $212.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLL's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while RBCP trades at $123.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBCP's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while HLMN trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HLMN's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 132.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while EML trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check EML's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SCX trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCX's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while PFIN trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check PFIN's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SCAG trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCAG's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while CVR trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check CVR's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while HDNG trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HDNG's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while SWT trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWT's competition here

KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $36.36, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.44, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLTW's competition here