Kennametal Inc. (KMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | $34.22 | +2.18% | 2.6B | 17.82 | $1.92 | +2.34% |
| SNA | $413.62 | +0.37% | 21.4B | 21.71 | $19.06 | +2.29% |
| RBC | $609.60 | +0.83% | 19.3B | 49.21 | $12.38 | N/A |
| LECO | $262.92 | +1.74% | 14.4B | 25.73 | $10.22 | +1.19% |
| SWK | $92.56 | +0.72% | 14.4B | 19.61 | $4.72 | +3.58% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $142.36 | +2.30% | 9.9B | 25.43 | $5.60 | +1.00% |
| TTC | $97.06 | -0.02% | 9.2B | 21.61 | $4.49 | +1.59% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMT vs SNA Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while SNA trades at $413.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SNA's competition here
KMT vs RBC Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while RBC trades at $609.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 49.21. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBC's competition here
KMT vs LECO Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while LECO trades at $262.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check LECO's competition here
KMT vs SWK Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while SWK trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWK's competition here
KMT vs SWH Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWH's competition here
KMT vs ROLLP Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLLP's competition here
KMT vs TKR Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while TKR trades at $142.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TKR's competition here
KMT vs TTC Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while TTC trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TTC's competition here
KMT vs ROLL Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLL's competition here
KMT vs RBCP Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBCP's competition here
KMT vs HLMN Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while HLMN trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HLMN's competition here
KMT vs EML Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while EML trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check EML's competition here
KMT vs SCX Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCX's competition here
KMT vs PFIN Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check PFIN's competition here
KMT vs CVR Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while CVR trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check CVR's competition here
KMT vs SWT Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWT's competition here
KMT vs TBLTW Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLTW's competition here
KMT vs HDNG Comparison July 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $34.22, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.82, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HDNG's competition here