Kennametal Inc.
Kennametal Inc. (KMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | $39.20 | -0.71% | 3B | 27.41 | $1.43 | +2.05% |
| SNA | $378.42 | -3.16% | 19.7B | 19.72 | $19.19 | +2.43% |
| RBC | $589.51 | -1.98% | 18.6B | 69.42 | $8.49 | N/A |
| LECO | $260.00 | -1.20% | 14.3B | 27.90 | $9.32 | +1.18% |
| SWK | $76.64 | +0.83% | 11.9B | 28.92 | $2.65 | +4.32% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +4.32% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TTC | $95.23 | -1.07% | 9.3B | 28.51 | $3.34 | +1.62% |
| TKR | $107.20 | -1.38% | 7.5B | 26.07 | $4.11 | +1.30% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMT vs SNA Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SNA trades at $378.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SNA's competition here
KMT vs RBC Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while RBC trades at $589.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 69.42. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBC's competition here
KMT vs LECO Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while LECO trades at $260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check LECO's competition here
KMT vs SWK Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SWK trades at $76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWK's competition here
KMT vs SWH Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWH's competition here
KMT vs ROLLP Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLLP's competition here
KMT vs TTC Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while TTC trades at $95.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TTC's competition here
KMT vs TKR Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while TKR trades at $107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TKR's competition here
KMT vs ROLL Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLL's competition here
KMT vs RBCP Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBCP's competition here
KMT vs HLMN Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while HLMN trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HLMN's competition here
KMT vs EML Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while EML trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check EML's competition here
KMT vs SCX Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCX's competition here
KMT vs SCAG Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SCAG trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCAG's competition here
KMT vs PFIN Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check PFIN's competition here
KMT vs CVR Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while CVR trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check CVR's competition here
KMT vs TBLT Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 433. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while TBLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLT's competition here
KMT vs SWT Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWT's competition here
KMT vs HDNG Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HDNG's competition here
KMT vs TBLTW Comparison April 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 3B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $39.20, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLTW's competition here