Surf Air Mobility Inc.
Surf Air Mobility Inc. SRFM Peers
See (SRFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRFM | $3.41 | +34.25% | 65.3M | -0.96 | -$3.54 | N/A |
| DAL | $48.97 | +1.37% | 32B | 8.68 | $5.64 | +1.22% |
| UAL | $77.55 | +1.07% | 25.3B | 7.06 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $31.52 | +0.57% | 18B | 35.44 | $0.89 | +2.28% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $40.03 | +2.61% | 12.1B | 11.28 | $3.55 | +1.60% |
| PAC | $224.82 | +0.56% | 11.3B | 24.04 | $9.35 | +5.14% |
| ASR | $313.27 | +1.07% | 9.3B | 13.10 | $23.86 | +9.64% |
| JOBY-WT | $1.97 | +12.57% | 7.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JOBY | $9.48 | +11.27% | 7.5B | -11.27 | -$0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRFM vs DAL Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while DAL trades at $48.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs UAL Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while UAL trades at $77.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs LUV Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while LUV trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs CEA Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs LTM Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while LTM trades at $40.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs PAC Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while PAC trades at $224.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ASR Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ASR trades at $313.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs JOBY-WT Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs JOBY Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while JOBY trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs AAL Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while AAL trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs RYAAY Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while RYAAY trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ALK Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ALK trades at $49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs OMAB Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while OMAB trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs CPA Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while CPA trades at $106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs GOL Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs SKYW Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while SKYW trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs PBI-PB Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while PBI-PB trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs CAAP Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while CAAP trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs AAWW Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs JBLU Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while JBLU trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ATSG Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ALGT Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ALGT trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs UP Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while UP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs HA Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ULCC Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 822.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ULCC trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs SNCY Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while SNCY trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs VLRS Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 518.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while VLRS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs BLDEW Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while BLDEW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs BLDE Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while BLDE trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ASLE Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ASLE trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -54.73. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs FLYX Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while FLYX trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs AZUL Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs FLYY Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while FLYY trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs MATH Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while MATH trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs SAVE Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs MESA Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while MESA trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs SOAR Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while SOAR trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs FLYX-WT Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ASLEW Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.
SRFM vs ZNH Comparison
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 65.3M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $3.41, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.