The Southern Company

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 137.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEE-PN trades at $22.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 136.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEE trades at $66.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SOJE trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 100.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SOJC trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SOJD trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DUK trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 94.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DUKB trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 93.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DUK-PA trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 79.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEE-PR trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NGGTF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NGG trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AEP trades at $107.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SREA trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EXC trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while D trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while XEL trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ED trades at $110.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PEG trades at $79.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ELC trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ETR trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while WEC trades at $109.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ELEZY trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTE trades at $137.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTG trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTB trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTW trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NSARO trades at $76.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AEE trades at $99.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PPL trades at $36.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NSARP trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while FE trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while FTS trades at $49.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HRNNF trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMS trades at $73.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMSA trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CLPHY trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMSD trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ES trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMSC trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CLPHF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EIX trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while TERRF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AQNB trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILIO trades at $67.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while TNABF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EBR-B trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EBR trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while TNABY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CKISF trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CKISY trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EVRG trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while LNT trades at $61.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EMRAF trades at $43.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while KEP trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PNW trades at $93.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while RDEIY trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ELIAF trades at $92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPCO trades at $90.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while OGE trades at $45.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EQUEY trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPEO trades at $74.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPEP trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while FORFF trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while TEZNY trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPEM trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMS-PB trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IDA trades at $116.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EGIEY trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PA trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IESFY trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ENIC trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PB trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CMS-PC trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while TXNM trades at $52.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PC trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PE trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PD trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO and PCG-PD have similar daily volatility (0.73).

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while POR trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCG-PG trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while OKLO trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -38.78. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while WELPM trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while WELPP trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILLM trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILLN trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILIN trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWLM trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILLP trades at $65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CEPU trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EDN trades at $30.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ETI-P trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 979.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EAI trades at $20.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 644.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CUPUF trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while RELFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 424.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while GNE trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 312.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLPL trades at $51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 311.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNTHP trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ABZPY trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNTHN trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 232.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWEN trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLHP trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 229.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWEL trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 208.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWLN trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 204.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while GPJA trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLTN trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 188.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLHN trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ENO trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EMP trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ENJ trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 91.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while VIASP trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while SUME trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while MCPB trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EUSP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 722498.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while RIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while USWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while RENU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWLL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWLL trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ALP-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, CNP-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AEPPZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IPWLO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IPWLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PCGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, HAWLI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while HAWLI trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, BANGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while BANGN trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ENIA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NMPWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NMPWP trades at $56.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IPWLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, PNMXO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, AILIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while AILIP trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, DCUE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, EVSO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while EVSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEE-PP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, ENIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEWEN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IPWLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, IPLDP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 100.36B. In comparison, NEE-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $91.22, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.88, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.