The Southern Company

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NEE trades at $70.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NEE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SOJD trades at $20.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SOJD's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SOJC trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SOJC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SOJE trades at $18.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SOJE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DUK trades at $122.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DUK's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DUK-PA trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DUK-PA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DUKB trades at $24.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DUKB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NEE-PR trades at $40.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NEE-PR's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NGG trades at $71.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NGG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while AEP trades at $113.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check AEP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SREA trades at $22.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SREA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while D trades at $60.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas D's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check D's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NEE-PN trades at $22.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NEE-PN's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EXC trades at $44.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EXC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PEG trades at $88.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PEG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while XEL trades at $73.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check XEL's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EXCVV's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ELC trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ELC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ETR trades at $89.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ETR's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ED trades at $104.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ED's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while WEC trades at $110.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check WEC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTB trades at $17.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTG trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTW trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTW's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTE trades at $138.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while AEE trades at $102.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check AEE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PPL trades at $35.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PPL's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while FTS trades at $49.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check FTS's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while FE trades at $43.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check FE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ES trades at $65.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ES's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTY's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMS trades at $74.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMS's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMSC trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMSC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMSD trades at $23.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMSD's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMSA trades at $22.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMSA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EIX trades at $53.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EIX's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while AQNB trades at $25.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check AQNB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while KEP trades at $13.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check KEP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while LNT trades at $65.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check LNT's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EVRG trades at $71.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EVRG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EBR-B trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EBR-B's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EBR trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EBR's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check AGR's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PNW trades at $90.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PNW's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while OKLO trades at $71.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -152.15. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check OKLO's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while OGE trades at $45.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check OGE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while IDA trades at $124.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check IDA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMS-PB trades at $77.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMS-PB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while TXNM trades at $56.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check TXNM's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PA trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CMS-PC trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CMS-PC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PB trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PC trades at $18.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PD trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PD's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PE trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while POR trades at $41.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check POR's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTJ's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCG-PG trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCG-PG's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ENIC trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ENIC's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PNM's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CEPU trades at $12.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CEPU's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EDN trades at $28.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EDN's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ETI-P trades at $22.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ETI-P's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EAI trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EAI's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 543.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while GNE trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check GNE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SPKE's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check SPKEP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check GNE-PA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 202.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while GPJA trades at $21.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check GPJA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ENO trades at $22.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ENO's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while EMP trades at $21.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check EMP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ENJ trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ENJ's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while VIASP trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check VIASP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check VIA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check CNP-PB's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DTP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ALP-PQ's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check ENIA's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NEE-PP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check PCGU's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check AEPPZ's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check IPLDP's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check NEE-PQ's competition here

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 104.4B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $94.99, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.Check DCUE's competition here