Sylvamo Corporation
Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLVM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVM | $41.46 | +3.31% | 1.6B | 12.79 | $3.24 | +4.32% |
| SUZ | $9.61 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 4.67 | $2.06 | +1.91% |
| UFPI | $89.98 | +0.33% | 5.1B | 18.00 | $5.00 | +1.56% |
| LPX | $70.27 | -1.43% | 4.9B | 33.78 | $2.08 | +1.61% |
| WFG | $64.16 | +0.52% | 4.9B | -5.32 | -$12.08 | +2.00% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $8.53 | +0.24% | 466.7M | -1.38 | -$6.19 | +4.72% |
| CLW | $14.02 | -1.06% | 224.9M | -4.27 | -$3.28 | N/A |
| MERC | $1.35 | +0.75% | 90.4M | -0.18 | -$7.44 | +5.79% |
Stock Comparison
SLVM vs SUZ Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while SUZ trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check SUZ's competition here
SLVM vs UFPI Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while UFPI trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check UFPI's competition here
SLVM vs LPX Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while LPX trades at $70.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check LPX's competition here
SLVM vs WFG Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while WFG trades at $64.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check WFG's competition here
SLVM vs RFP Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check RFP's competition here
SLVM vs SWM Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check SWM's competition here
SLVM vs MATV Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while MATV trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check MATV's competition here
SLVM vs CLW Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while CLW trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check CLW's competition here
SLVM vs MERC Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while MERC trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MERC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check MERC's competition here
SLVM vs GLT Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check GLT's competition here
SLVM vs EVA Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check EVA's competition here
SLVM vs JCTCF Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check JCTCF's competition here
SLVM vs NWGL Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while NWGL trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check NWGL's competition here
SLVM vs JCTC Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while JCTC trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check JCTC's competition here
SLVM vs ITP Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while ITP trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check ITP's competition here
SLVM vs AEPI Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check AEPI's competition here
SLVM vs DEL Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check DEL's competition here
SLVM vs VRS Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check VRS's competition here
SLVM vs UFS Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check UFS's competition here
SLVM vs KS Comparison April 2026
SLVM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVM stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLVM is priced at $41.46, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.79, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVM's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVM is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVM.Check KS's competition here