Solid Power, Inc.
Solid Power, Inc. SLDPW Peers
See (SLDPW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLDPW | $0.41 | -3.57% | 72.7M | -0.01 | -$46.38 | N/A |
ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
VRT | $120.72 | -5.96% | 46B | 70.16 | $1.72 | +0.13% |
HUBB | $422.26 | +1.09% | 22.5B | 28.52 | $14.81 | +1.51% |
NVT | $74.67 | -0.70% | 12.3B | 51.86 | $1.44 | +1.30% |
AYI | $302.69 | -0.09% | 9.3B | 23.84 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
BE | $25.85 | -9.96% | 6B | 1294.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
AEIS | $143.62 | +1.76% | 5.4B | 72.55 | $1.98 | +0.35% |
WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | N/A |
ENS | $88.80 | +0.40% | 3.4B | 9.88 | $8.99 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
SLDPW vs ABB Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs VRT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while VRT trades at $120.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 70.16. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs HUBB Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while HUBB trades at $422.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs NVT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while NVT trades at $74.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs AYI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while AYI trades at $302.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs BE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while BE trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1294.00. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs AEIS Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while AEIS trades at $143.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs WIRE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ENS Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ENS trades at $88.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs HAYW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while HAYW trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ENVX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ENVX trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs POWL Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while POWL trades at $212.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ATKR Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ATKR trades at $76.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs PLUG Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while PLUG trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs HOLI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ENR Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ENR trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs AMPX-WT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while AMPX-WT trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs EOSEW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while EOSEW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs EOSE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while EOSE trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs MVST Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while MVST trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs PLPC Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 829M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while PLPC trades at $167.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs AMPX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 782.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while AMPX trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ADSE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 619.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ADSE trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs KE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while KE trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SLDP Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 469M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SLDP trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SES-WT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SES-WT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs LTBR Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while LTBR trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs AIRJ Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while AIRJ trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs EAF Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while EAF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs FREY Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs TE Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while TE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs NVX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while NVX trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs NEOV Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while NEOV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ELVA Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ELVA trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -94.75. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ULBI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ULBI trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ESP Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ESP trades at $47.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs FCEL Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while FCEL trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SVT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs RAYA Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while RAYA trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -64.25. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ELPW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ELPW trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SKYX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SKYX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs OPTT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while OPTT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs CBAT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while CBAT trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs MVSTW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while MVSTW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs RFIL Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while RFIL trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -51.07. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ADSEW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ADSEW trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs IPWR Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while IPWR trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs NEOVW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while NEOVW trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs CHEV Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while CHEV trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs FLUX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while FLUX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs APWC Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while APWC trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs PPSI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while PPSI trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs GWH-WT Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs OESX Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while OESX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs GWH Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while GWH trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SDST Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SDST trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs CCTG Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while CCTG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs STI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while STI trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs PITA Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs NXU Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs POLA Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while POLA trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs XPON Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while XPON trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs DFLIW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs SDSTW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs DFLI Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while DFLI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs DCFC Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs DCFCW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs ENR-PA Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.
SLDPW vs BLNKW Comparison
SLDPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLDPW stands at 72.7M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLDPW is priced at $0.41, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLDPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLDPW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLDPW is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLDPW.