Signify Health, Inc.
Signify Health, Inc. SGFY Peers
See (SGFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| VEEV | $280.06 | -0.49% | 45.8B | 59.59 | $4.70 | N/A |
| GEHC | $71.28 | -0.85% | 32.6B | 14.97 | $4.76 | +0.18% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.18% |
| DOCS | $57.37 | +0.57% | 10.8B | 51.68 | $1.11 | N/A |
| HQY | $101.30 | -0.69% | 8.8B | 73.94 | $1.37 | N/A |
| RCM | $14.31 | N/A | 6B | -102.21 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BTSG | $22.27 | -0.49% | 3.9B | 82.48 | $0.27 | N/A |
| BTSGU | $78.24 | -0.43% | 3.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ONEM | $16.47 | N/A | 3.4B | -7.77 | -$2.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SGFY vs VEEV Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while VEEV trades at $280.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs GEHC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while GEHC trades at $71.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs GEHCV Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs DOCS Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while DOCS trades at $57.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 51.68. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs HQY Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while HQY trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 73.94. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to HQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs RCM Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BTSG Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BTSG trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 82.48. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BTSGU Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BTSGU trades at $78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ONEM Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PRVA Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PRVA trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 182.08. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs WGS Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while WGS trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is -48.20. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to WGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PINC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PINC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PINC trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PINC's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PINC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PGNY Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PGNY trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CERT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CERT trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is -527.00. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CERT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs GDRX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while GDRX trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs NXGN Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PHR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PHR trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is -35.45. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PHR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SDGR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SDGR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SDGR trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SDGR's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SDGR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SDGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs AGTI Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs TXG Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while TXG trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to TXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs OMCL Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while OMCL trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 60.93. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs TDOC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while TDOC trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs EVH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while EVH trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to EVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs HSTM Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 812M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while HSTM trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CTEV Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 658.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CTEV trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTEV's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs NUTX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NUTX has a market cap of 632.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while NUTX trades at $113.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas NUTX's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NUTX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to NUTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MPLN-WT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ACCD Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SHCR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs DH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while DH trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas DH's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DH's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to DH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SLGCW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SLGC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs NRC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while NRC trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to NRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MPLN Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MPLN's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SLP Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 348.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SLP trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SPOK Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SPOK trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs TBRG Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 336.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while TBRG trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is -18.36. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TBRG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs TRHC Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs HCAT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while HCAT trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SMFR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMFR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs OPRX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while OPRX trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OPRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SOPH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SOPH trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SY Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SY trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs EUDA Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while EUDA trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CPSI Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPSI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs AUGX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs AMWL Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while AMWL trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CCLDO Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CCLDO trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CCLD Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CCLD trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs FORA Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while FORA trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -17.92. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to FORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CCLDP Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BEATW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BEATW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BEAT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BEAT has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BEAT trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BEAT's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BEAT's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SNCE Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs AKLI Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SHLT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SHCRW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs STRM Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while STRM trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to STRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs RNLX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RNLX's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs LIFW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while LIFW trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LIFW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MGRX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MGRX trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs VSEEW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while VSEEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs VSEE Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while VSEE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BFRGW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BFRGW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BFRG Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BFRG trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs BBLN Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs INOV Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, INOV has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while INOV trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas INOV's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to INOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs HCTI Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while HCTI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HCTI's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs SCNX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while SCNX trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCNX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ONMD Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ONMD trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MSPR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MSPR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MSPR trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSPR's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MSPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ETAO Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ZCMD Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ZCMD trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs HLTH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs OTRK Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while OTRK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs UPH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to UPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs EUDAW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while EUDAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ACON Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ACON trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ACON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PEAR Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs PEARW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while PEARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs FOXO Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FOXO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while FOXO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas FOXO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FOXO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to FOXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CMAX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CMAX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CMAX's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs WORX Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while WORX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to WORX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs LIFWZ Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs WGSWW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while WGSWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs OTRKP Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OTRKP has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while OTRKP trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas OTRKP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OTRKP's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to OTRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ICCT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ICCT has a market cap of 780.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ICCT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ICCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ICCT's ROE of -14.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ICCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs KERN Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while KERN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KERN's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to KERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs KERNW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MSPRZ Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 116.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MSPRZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs LIFWW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CMAXW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs ACONW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while ACONW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to ACONW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MSPRW Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MSPRW has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MSPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MSPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSPRW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MSPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs UTRS Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, UTRS has a market cap of 888. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while UTRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas UTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UTRS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is more volatile compared to UTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs NH Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while NH trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas NH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to NH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CHNGU Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CHNGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CHNGU trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CHNGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHNGU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CHNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs CSLT Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while CSLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.
SGFY vs MTBCP Comparison
SGFY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGFY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGFY is priced at $30.49, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGFY currently has a P/E ratio of 70.91, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGFY's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGFY is less volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGFY.