Sweetgreen, Inc.
Sweetgreen, Inc. SG Peers
See (SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG | $13.26 | +3.19% | 1.57B | -17.22 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| MCD | $314.23 | -0.70% | 224.68B | 27.73 | $11.33 | +2.19% |
| SBUX | $83.97 | +1.19% | 95.42B | 30.53 | $2.75 | +2.85% |
| CMG | $50.78 | -0.02% | 68.42B | 44.94 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.49 | -0.64% | 40.44B | 28.98 | $5.02 | +1.87% |
| DRI | $203.86 | +0.36% | 23.86B | 22.96 | $8.88 | +2.75% |
| QSR | $69.38 | -0.06% | 22.73B | 23.52 | $2.95 | +3.41% |
| DPZ | $482.26 | +0.37% | 16.51B | 27.64 | $17.45 | +1.30% |
| YUMC | $42.51 | -0.64% | 15.87B | 17.78 | $2.39 | +1.69% |
| TXRH | $188.73 | +0.87% | 12.52B | 29.17 | $6.47 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
SG vs MCD Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 224.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while MCD trades at $314.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs SBUX Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 95.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while SBUX trades at $83.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CMG Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 68.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CMG trades at $50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs YUM Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while YUM trades at $145.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs DRI Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while DRI trades at $203.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs QSR Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while QSR trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs DPZ Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while DPZ trades at $482.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs YUMC Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while YUMC trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs TXRH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while TXRH trades at $188.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BROS Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BROS trades at $68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 175.54. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CAVA Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CAVA trades at $84.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 70.27. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs WING Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while WING trades at $321.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs EAT Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while EAT trades at $149.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs SHAK Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while SHAK trades at $117.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 404.66. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CAKE Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CAKE trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs WEN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while WEN trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs ARCO Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while ARCO trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs HDL Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while HDL trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs PZZA Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while PZZA trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CBRL Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CBRL trades at $55.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CNNE Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CNNE trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FWRG Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 970.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FWRG trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 93.59. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BJRI Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 917.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BJRI trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs TWNPV Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs KRUS Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 765.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while KRUS trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -68.86. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 763.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BH trades at $246.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BH-A Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 761.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BH-A trades at $1,207.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs PTLO Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 751.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while PTLO trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs RUTH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BLMN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 655.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BLMN trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CHUY Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs TAST Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs NATH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 417.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while NATH trades at $102.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs JACK Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 382.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while JACK trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs DIN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 350.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while DIN trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs RICK Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 347.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while RICK trades at $39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs VENU Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 337.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while VENU trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs PBPB Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 299.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while PBPB trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs LOCO Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 270.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while LOCO trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs TWNP Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 241.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while TWNP trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FRGI Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs DENN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 194.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while DENN trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BBQ Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs STKS Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 112.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while STKS trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs THCHW Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs THCH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 86.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while THCH trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs MB Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 68.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while MB trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs GRIL Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FATAV Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs RRGB Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 53.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while RRGB trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FATBW Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FATBW trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BDL Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 50.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BDL trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs ARKR Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 43.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while ARKR trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FAT Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 41.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FAT trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FATBB Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 41.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FATBB trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FATBP Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 41.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FATBP trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs RAVE Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while RAVE trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs NDLS Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 35.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while NDLS trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs YOSH Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 25.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while YOSH trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs MYT Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs GENK Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 18.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while GENK trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs GTIM Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 16.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while GTIM trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs PC Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 15.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while PC trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -19.16. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs REBN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while REBN trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs CHSN Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 12.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while CHSN trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BTBDW Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 10.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BTBDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BTBD Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BTBD trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BTB Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs FATBV Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs PNST Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 3.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while PNST trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BFI Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs BFIIW Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SG is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.
SG vs ONDR Comparison
SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SG stands at 1.57B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, SG is priced at $13.26, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SG currently has a P/E ratio of -17.22, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SG's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SG is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SG.