Shengfeng Development Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SFWL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SFWL
Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFWL | $0.99 | +14.65% | 83.3M | 7.21 | $0.14 | N/A |
| FDX | $356.79 | -1.34% | 85.6B | 19.16 | $18.73 | +1.62% |
| UPS | $96.04 | -2.18% | 82.5B | 14.81 | $6.56 | +6.79% |
| XPO | $203.30 | +1.39% | 24.1B | 77.40 | $2.65 | N/A |
| JBHT | $219.24 | +2.01% | 20.7B | 35.46 | $6.13 | +0.82% |
| CHRW | $166.60 | -0.74% | 20B | 34.99 | $4.83 | +1.48% |
| ZTO | $24.59 | -1.44% | 19.9B | 15.40 | $1.62 | +2.57% |
| EXPD | $146.20 | +0.26% | 19.4B | 24.45 | $5.95 | +1.06% |
| GXO | $52.62 | -0.87% | 6.1B | 189.36 | $0.28 | N/A |
| LSTR | $167.35 | +2.50% | 5.6B | 49.93 | $3.31 | +2.19% |
Stock Comparison
SFWL vs FDX Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FDX trades at $356.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDX's competition here
SFWL vs UPS Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while UPS trades at $96.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UPS's competition here
SFWL vs XPO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while XPO trades at $203.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 77.40. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check XPO's competition here
SFWL vs JBHT Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while JBHT trades at $219.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JBHT's competition here
SFWL vs CHRW Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CHRW trades at $166.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CHRW's competition here
SFWL vs ZTO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ZTO trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ZTO's competition here
SFWL vs EXPD Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while EXPD trades at $146.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check EXPD's competition here
SFWL vs GXO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while GXO trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 189.36. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GXO's competition here
SFWL vs LSTR Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while LSTR trades at $167.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSTR's competition here
SFWL vs HUBG Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while HUBG trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HUBG's competition here
SFWL vs PBI Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PBI trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PBI's competition here
SFWL vs FWRD Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 548.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FWRD trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FWRD's competition here
SFWL vs CYRX Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CYRX trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CYRX's competition here
SFWL vs RLGT Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while RLGT trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check RLGT's competition here
SFWL vs PAL Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PAL trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PAL's competition here
SFWL vs SINO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SINO's competition here
SFWL vs CRGO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CRGO trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGO's competition here
SFWL vs AIRT Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRT trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRT's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTP Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRTP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 57.38. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTP's competition here
SFWL vs FLX Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FLX trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FLX's competition here
SFWL vs NCEW Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while NCEW trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check NCEW's competition here
SFWL vs PSIG Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PSIG trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PSIG's competition here
SFWL vs BTOC Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while BTOC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check BTOC's competition here
SFWL vs ELOG Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ELOG trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ELOG's competition here
SFWL vs CRGOW Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CRGOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGOW's competition here
SFWL vs JYD Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while JYD trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JYD's competition here
SFWL vs CJMB Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CJMB trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CJMB's competition here
SFWL vs LSH Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while LSH trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSH's competition here
SFWL vs GVH Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while GVH trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GVH's competition here
SFWL vs ATXG Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ATXG trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ATXG's competition here
SFWL vs SGLY Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while SGLY trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SGLY's competition here
SFWL vs UTIW Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UTIW's competition here
SFWL vs ECHO Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ECHO's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTW Comparison April 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 83.3M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.21, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTW's competition here