Shengfeng Development Limited

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 81.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while UPS trades at $95.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DPSGY has a market cap of 59.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DPSGY trades at $49.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DPSGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPSGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 52.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while FDX trades at $217.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DSDVY has a market cap of 52.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DSDVY trades at $110.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DSDVY's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSDVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DSDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DSDVF has a market cap of 51.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DSDVF trades at $218.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DSDVF's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSDVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DSDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DPSTF has a market cap of 49.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DPSTF trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPSTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DHLGY has a market cap of 48.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DHLGY trades at $42.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DHLGY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHLGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DHLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, KHNGY has a market cap of 26.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while KHNGY trades at $43.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas KHNGY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHNGY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to KHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, KHNGF has a market cap of 25.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while KHNGF trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas KHNGF's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHNGF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to KHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, QBBHY has a market cap of 20.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while QBBHY trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas QBBHY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QBBHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to QBBHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 15.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ZTO trades at $18.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while EXPD trades at $109.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while JBHT trades at $135.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 13.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while XPO trades at $111.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CHRW trades at $88.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, JDLGF has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while JDLGF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JDLGF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JDLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SGHHF has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SGHHF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SGHHF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SGHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SGHDY has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SGHDY trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SGHDY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGHDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SGHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PGUCY has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PGUCY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PGUCY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGUCY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PGUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while LSTR trades at $135.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SNOTF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SNOTF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SNOTF's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNOTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SNOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while GXO trades at $39.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PTNYF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PTNYF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PTNYF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTNYF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PTNYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ROYMY has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ROYMY trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ROYMY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROYMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ROYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ROYMF has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ROYMF trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ROYMF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROYMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ROYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, QUBHF has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while QUBHF trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas QUBHF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUBHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to QUBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CDNIF has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CDNIF trades at $29.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CDNIF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDNIF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CDNIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, MFGHF has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while MFGHF trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas MFGHF's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFGHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to MFGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, OSTIY has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while OSTIY trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas OSTIY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSTIY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to OSTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, OERCF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while OERCF trades at $33.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas OERCF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OERCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to OERCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while HUBG trades at $33.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, KMGIF has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while KMGIF trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas KMGIF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMGIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to KMGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PBI trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ANDHF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ANDHF trades at $38.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ANDHF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANDHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ANDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, KRRYF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while KRRYF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas KRRYF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRRYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to KRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, GRDLY has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while GRDLY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas GRDLY's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRDLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GRDLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CTTOF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CTTOF trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CTTOF's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTTOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CTTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CGJTF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CGJTF trades at $65.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CGJTF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGJTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CGJTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SPSTY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SPSTY trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SPSTY's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPSTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SPSTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, BPOSF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while BPOSF trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BPOSF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPOSF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to BPOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SPSTF has a market cap of 990.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SPSTF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SPSTF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PGUUF has a market cap of 903.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PGUUF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PGUUF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGUUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PGUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, RYSKF has a market cap of 800.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while RYSKF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas RYSKF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYSKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to RYSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PSTNY has a market cap of 622.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PSTNY trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PSTNY's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSTNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PSTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, TNTFF has a market cap of 537.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while TNTFF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas TNTFF's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNTFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to TNTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 496.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while FWRD trades at $16.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 420.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while AIRTP trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 51.94. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 354.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CYRX trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, BPOSY has a market cap of 310.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while BPOSY trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BPOSY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPOSY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to BPOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 282.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while RLGT trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 194.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PAL trades at $7.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -89.69. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CSCMY has a market cap of 188.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CSCMY trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CSCMY's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSCMY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CSCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, YTOEF has a market cap of 166.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while YTOEF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas YTOEF's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YTOEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to YTOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 105.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CRGO trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SINO trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, DVNHF has a market cap of 84.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while DVNHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DVNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVNHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to DVNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ESLGF has a market cap of 61.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ESLGF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ESLGF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESLGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ESLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 54.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while FLX trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 49.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while AIRT trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -64.64. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 49.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while BTOC trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, TTNMF has a market cap of 45.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while TTNMF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas TTNMF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTNMF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to TTNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, JANL has a market cap of 37.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while JANL trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JANL's P/E ratio is 110.34. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while NCEW trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ASNCF has a market cap of 21.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ASNCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ASNCF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ASNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 20.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CJMB trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 20.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while JYD trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 16.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while GVH trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 9.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while HKPD trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKPD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PDPTF has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PDPTF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PDPTF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PDPTF's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PDPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 8.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while PSIG trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while CRGOW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 7.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while LSH trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ATXG trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SGLY trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, UNQL has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while UNQL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas UNQL's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNQL's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UNQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, NVGT has a market cap of 49364.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while NVGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NVGT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVGT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to NVGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, USRC has a market cap of 24326.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while USRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas USRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to USRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SCBZ has a market cap of 16799.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SCBZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SCBZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCBZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SCBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, SGRZ has a market cap of 4758.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while SGRZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SGRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGRZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, ECHO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while ECHO trades at $48.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.

SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 84.14M. In comparison, AIRTW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $1.02, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.