Shengfeng Development Limited
Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFWL | $0.96 | -2.53% | 80.8M | 7.54 | $0.13 | N/A |
| UPS | $87.18 | -4.03% | 73.9B | 12.97 | $6.72 | +7.10% |
| FDX | $223.86 | -4.55% | 52.8B | 13.32 | $16.80 | +2.37% |
| ZTO | $19.98 | +1.42% | 16.1B | 12.57 | $1.59 | +3.55% |
| XPO | $132.29 | -1.61% | 15.6B | 40.72 | $3.25 | N/A |
| EXPD | $111.37 | -2.70% | 15.2B | 18.49 | $6.02 | +1.31% |
| JBHT | $143.87 | -1.98% | 13.9B | 26.11 | $5.51 | +1.18% |
| CHRW | $97.65 | -2.14% | 11.6B | 23.31 | $4.19 | +2.49% |
| GXO | $49.78 | -3.49% | 5.7B | 80.24 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $133.37 | -3.30% | 4.7B | 26.46 | $5.04 | +2.53% |
Stock Comparison
SFWL vs UPS Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while UPS trades at $87.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UPS's competition here
SFWL vs FDX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while FDX trades at $223.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDX's competition here
SFWL vs ZTO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while ZTO trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ZTO's competition here
SFWL vs XPO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while XPO trades at $132.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check XPO's competition here
SFWL vs EXPD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while EXPD trades at $111.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check EXPD's competition here
SFWL vs JBHT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while JBHT trades at $143.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JBHT's competition here
SFWL vs CHRW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while CHRW trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CHRW's competition here
SFWL vs GXO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while GXO trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GXO's competition here
SFWL vs LSTR Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while LSTR trades at $133.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSTR's competition here
SFWL vs HUBG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while HUBG trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HUBG's competition here
SFWL vs PBI Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while PBI trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PBI's competition here
SFWL vs FWRD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while FWRD trades at $30.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FWRD's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTP Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 445.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while AIRTP trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 55.09. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTP's competition here
SFWL vs CYRX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while CYRX trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CYRX's competition here
SFWL vs RLGT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while RLGT trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check RLGT's competition here
SFWL vs PAL Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while PAL trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -89.87. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PAL's competition here
SFWL vs CRGO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while CRGO trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGO's competition here
SFWL vs SINO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SINO's competition here
SFWL vs FLX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while FLX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FLX's competition here
SFWL vs BTOC Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while BTOC trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check BTOC's competition here
SFWL vs AIRT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while AIRT trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRT's competition here
SFWL vs JYD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while JYD trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JYD's competition here
SFWL vs CJMB Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while CJMB trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CJMB's competition here
SFWL vs NCEW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while NCEW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 76.04. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check NCEW's competition here
SFWL vs CRGOW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while CRGOW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGOW's competition here
SFWL vs HKPD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while HKPD trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HKPD's competition here
SFWL vs PSIG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while PSIG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PSIG's competition here
SFWL vs LSH Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while LSH trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSH's competition here
SFWL vs GVH Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while GVH trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GVH's competition here
SFWL vs ATXG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while ATXG trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ATXG's competition here
SFWL vs SGLY Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while SGLY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SGLY's competition here
SFWL vs ECHO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ECHO's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.8M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.96, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.54, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTW's competition here