SES AI Corporation WT
SES AI Corporation WT SES-WT Peers
See (SES-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES-WT | $0.12 | +12.55% | 432.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $123.72 | -3.62% | 46B | 70.16 | $1.72 | +0.13% |
| HUBB | $419.67 | +0.47% | 22.5B | 28.52 | $14.81 | +1.51% |
| NVT | $74.49 | -0.94% | 12.3B | 51.86 | $1.44 | +1.30% |
| AYI | $296.02 | -2.29% | 9.3B | 23.84 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $25.67 | -10.61% | 6B | 1294.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $142.28 | +0.81% | 5.4B | 72.55 | $1.98 | +0.35% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | N/A |
| ENS | $87.77 | -0.77% | 3.4B | 9.88 | $8.99 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
SES-WT vs ABB Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs VRT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while VRT trades at $123.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 70.16. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs HUBB Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while HUBB trades at $419.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs NVT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while NVT trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs AYI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while AYI trades at $296.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs BE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while BE trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1294.00. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs AEIS Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while AEIS trades at $142.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs WIRE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ENS Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ENS trades at $87.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs HAYW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while HAYW trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ENVX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ENVX trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs POWL Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while POWL trades at $211.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ATKR Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ATKR trades at $74.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs PLUG Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while PLUG trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs HOLI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ENR Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ENR trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs AMPX-WT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while AMPX-WT trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs EOSEW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while EOSEW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs EOSE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while EOSE trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs MVST Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while MVST trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs PLPC Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 829M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while PLPC trades at $165.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs AMPX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 782.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while AMPX trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ADSE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 619.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ADSE trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs KE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while KE trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SLDP Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 469M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SLDP trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs LTBR Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while LTBR trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs AIRJ Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while AIRJ trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs EAF Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while EAF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs FREY Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs TE Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while TE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs NVX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while NVX trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs NEOV Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while NEOV trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ELVA Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ELVA trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -94.75. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ULBI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ULBI trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ESP Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ESP trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs FCEL Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while FCEL trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SVT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs RAYA Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while RAYA trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -64.25. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ELPW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ELPW trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SKYX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SKYX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs OPTT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while OPTT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs CBAT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while CBAT trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs MVSTW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while MVSTW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs RFIL Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while RFIL trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -51.07. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ADSEW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ADSEW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SLDPW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SLDPW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs IPWR Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while IPWR trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs NEOVW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while NEOVW trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs CHEV Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while CHEV trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs FLUX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while FLUX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs APWC Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while APWC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs PPSI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while PPSI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs GWH-WT Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs OESX Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while OESX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs GWH Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while GWH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SDST Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SDST trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs CCTG Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while CCTG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs STI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while STI trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs PITA Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs NXU Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs POLA Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while POLA trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs XPON Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while XPON trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs DFLIW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs SDSTW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs DFLI Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while DFLI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs DCFCW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs DCFC Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs ENR-PA Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.
SES-WT vs BLNKW Comparison
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 432.2M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.12, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.