SES AI Corporation WT
SES AI Corporation WT (SES-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SES-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES-WT | $0.18 | -20.94% | 376.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $141.59 | -2.75% | 54.1B | 67.43 | $2.10 | +0.10% |
| HUBB | $426.74 | -2.45% | 22.8B | 27.69 | $15.40 | +1.22% |
| NVT | $89.88 | +14.61% | 14.8B | 62.41 | $1.44 | +0.89% |
| AYI | $304.83 | -2.09% | 9.3B | 24.01 | $12.70 | +0.22% |
| BE | $36.72 | -1.79% | 8.5B | 1835.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $135.25 | -2.64% | 5.1B | 68.65 | $1.97 | +0.30% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | N/A |
| ENS | $89.20 | -3.43% | 3.4B | 9.92 | $8.99 | +1.07% |
Stock Comparison
SES-WT vs ABB Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ABB's competition here
SES-WT vs VRT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while VRT trades at $141.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 67.43. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check VRT's competition here
SES-WT vs HUBB Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while HUBB trades at $426.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check HUBB's competition here
SES-WT vs NVT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while NVT trades at $89.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 62.41. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check NVT's competition here
SES-WT vs AYI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while AYI trades at $304.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check AYI's competition here
SES-WT vs BE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while BE trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1835.75. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check BE's competition here
SES-WT vs AEIS Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while AEIS trades at $135.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 68.65. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check AEIS's competition here
SES-WT vs WIRE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check WIRE's competition here
SES-WT vs ENS Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ENS trades at $89.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ENS's competition here
SES-WT vs HAYW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while HAYW trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check HAYW's competition here
SES-WT vs POWL Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while POWL trades at $227.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check POWL's competition here
SES-WT vs ATKR Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ATKR trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ATKR's competition here
SES-WT vs ENVX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ENVX trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ENVX's competition here
SES-WT vs HOLI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check HOLI's competition here
SES-WT vs PLUG Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while PLUG trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check PLUG's competition here
SES-WT vs ENR Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ENR trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ENR's competition here
SES-WT vs EOSEW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while EOSEW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check EOSEW's competition here
SES-WT vs EOSE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while EOSE trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check EOSE's competition here
SES-WT vs MVST Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 982.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while MVST trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check MVST's competition here
SES-WT vs AMPX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 765.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while AMPX trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check AMPX's competition here
SES-WT vs AMPX-WT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 743.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while AMPX-WT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
SES-WT vs PLPC Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while PLPC trades at $148.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check PLPC's competition here
SES-WT vs ADSE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 669.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ADSE trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ADSE's competition here
SES-WT vs SLDP Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 557.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SLDP trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SLDP's competition here
SES-WT vs KE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 445.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while KE trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check KE's competition here
SES-WT vs EAF Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while EAF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EAF's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check EAF's competition here
SES-WT vs LTBR Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while LTBR trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check LTBR's competition here
SES-WT vs TGEN Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while TGEN trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -51.28. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check TGEN's competition here
SES-WT vs FREY Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check FREY's competition here
SES-WT vs AIRJ Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while AIRJ trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 44.22. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check AIRJ's competition here
SES-WT vs ELVA Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ELVA trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -121.50. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ELVA's competition here
SES-WT vs NVX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while NVX trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check NVX's competition here
SES-WT vs TE Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while TE trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check TE's competition here
SES-WT vs ELPW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ELPW trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ELPW's competition here
SES-WT vs NEOV Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while NEOV trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check NEOV's competition here
SES-WT vs ESP Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ESP trades at $46.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ESP's competition here
SES-WT vs ULBI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ULBI trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ULBI's competition here
SES-WT vs SVT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SVT's competition here
SES-WT vs FCEL Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while FCEL trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check FCEL's competition here
SES-WT vs SKYX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SKYX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SKYX's competition here
SES-WT vs OPTT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while OPTT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check OPTT's competition here
SES-WT vs SLDPW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SLDPW trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SLDPW's competition here
SES-WT vs RFIL Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while RFIL trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -56.43. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check RFIL's competition here
SES-WT vs MVSTW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while MVSTW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check MVSTW's competition here
SES-WT vs CBAT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while CBAT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check CBAT's competition here
SES-WT vs ADSEW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ADSEW trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ADSEW's competition here
SES-WT vs NEOVW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while NEOVW trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check NEOVW's competition here
SES-WT vs CHEV Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while CHEV trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check CHEV's competition here
SES-WT vs SDSTW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SDSTW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SDSTW's competition here
SES-WT vs IPWR Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while IPWR trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check IPWR's competition here
SES-WT vs APWC Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while APWC trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check APWC's competition here
SES-WT vs SDST Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while SDST trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check SDST's competition here
SES-WT vs PPSI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while PPSI trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check PPSI's competition here
SES-WT vs GWH-WT Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check GWH-WT's competition here
SES-WT vs FLUX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while FLUX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check FLUX's competition here
SES-WT vs GWH Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while GWH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check GWH's competition here
SES-WT vs OESX Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while OESX trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check OESX's competition here
SES-WT vs DFLIW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while DFLIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check DFLIW's competition here
SES-WT vs CCTG Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while CCTG trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check CCTG's competition here
SES-WT vs PITA Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check PITA's competition here
SES-WT vs DFLI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while DFLI trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check DFLI's competition here
SES-WT vs STI Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while STI trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check STI's competition here
SES-WT vs NXU Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check NXU's competition here
SES-WT vs POLA Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while POLA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check POLA's competition here
SES-WT vs XPON Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while XPON trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check XPON's competition here
SES-WT vs RAYA Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while RAYA trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check RAYA's competition here
SES-WT vs DCFCW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check DCFCW's competition here
SES-WT vs DCFC Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check DCFC's competition here
SES-WT vs BLNKW Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check BLNKW's competition here
SES-WT vs ENR-PA Comparison August 2025
SES-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SES-WT stands at 376.8M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SES-WT is priced at $0.18, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SES-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, SES-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SES-WT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES-WT.Check ENR-PA's competition here