Spirit Airlines, Inc.

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while DAL trades at $67.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check DAL's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while UAL trades at $110.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check UAL's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while RYAAY trades at $64.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check RYAAY's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while LUV trades at $52.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 65.94. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check LUV's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while LTM trades at $58.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check LTM's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CEA trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CEA's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while PAC trades at $288.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check PAC's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASR trades at $374.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASR's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JOBY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JOBY's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AAL trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 79.94. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AAL's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while OMAB trades at $130.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check OMAB's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ALK trades at $52.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 63.35. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ALK's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CPA trades at $139.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CPA's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CAAP trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CAAP's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while GOL trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check GOL's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SKYW trades at $101.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SKYW's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AERO trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AERO's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AAWW trades at $102.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AAWW's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JBLU trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JBLU's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ALGT trades at $104.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.41. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ALGT's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while PBI-PB trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check PBI-PB's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JOBY-WT trades at -$6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is more volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JOBY-WT's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ATSG trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE and ATSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSG's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ULCC trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ULCC's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while VLRS trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check VLRS's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SNCY trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SNCY's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while HA trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check HA's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while RJET trades at $19.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to RJET's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check RJET's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while UP trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check UP's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRTA trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRTA's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while BLDE trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check BLDE's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASLE trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 68.91. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASLE's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYX trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYX's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AZUL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AZUL's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRFM trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRFM's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while MATH trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check MATH's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYY trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYY's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check BLDEW's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYX-WT trades at -$14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYX-WT's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while MESA trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to MESA's ROE of +4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check MESA's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRTAW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRTAW's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SOAR trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SOAR's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ZNH trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ZNH's competition here

SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is -3.57%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASLEW's competition here