Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | $70.52 | +0.73% | 1.1B | 14.39 | $4.90 | +5.12% |
| PGR | $241.49 | +0.22% | 141.7B | 13.61 | $17.76 | +2.03% |
| CB | $268.55 | +0.96% | 107.6B | 11.85 | $22.66 | +1.38% |
| TRV | $259.82 | +1.93% | 58.5B | 11.50 | $22.61 | +1.64% |
| ALL-PH | $21.51 | +0.99% | 52.5B | 3.40 | $6.32 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PB | $25.74 | +0.23% | 52B | 2.14 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| ALL | $193.90 | +0.99% | 51.3B | 13.23 | $14.65 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| WRB-PG | $16.79 | +0.54% | 26.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.30% |
| WRB-PH | $16.41 | +0.55% | 26.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.30% |
Stock Comparison
SAFT vs PGR Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while PGR trades at $241.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PGR's competition here
SAFT vs CB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while CB trades at $268.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CB's competition here
SAFT vs TRV Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while TRV trades at $259.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check TRV's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL-PH trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PH's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL-PB trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PB's competition here
SAFT vs ALL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL trades at $193.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WRB-PG trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WRB-PH trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PH's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WRB-PF trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PF's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WRB-PE trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PE's competition here
SAFT vs WRB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WRB trades at $68.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB's competition here
SAFT vs MKL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while MKL trades at $2,018.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MKL's competition here
SAFT vs CINF Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while CINF trades at $152.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CINF's competition here
SAFT vs L Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while L trades at $91.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check L's competition here
SAFT vs CNA Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while CNA trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNA's competition here
SAFT vs AFGC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFGC trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGC's competition here
SAFT vs AFGD Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFGD trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGD's competition here
SAFT vs AFG Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFG trades at $125.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFG's competition here
SAFT vs KNSL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while KNSL trades at $450.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KNSL's competition here
SAFT vs AFGB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFGB trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFGE trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGE's competition here
SAFT vs AXS-PE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AXS-PE trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS-PE's competition here
SAFT vs AXS Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AXS trades at $97.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
SAFT vs RLI Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while RLI trades at $66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check RLI's competition here
SAFT vs THG Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while THG trades at $166.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check THG's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ALL-PI trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PI's competition here
SAFT vs SIGI Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while SIGI trades at $81.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGI's competition here
SAFT vs WTM Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while WTM trades at $1,796.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 166.97. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WTM's competition here
SAFT vs MCY Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while MCY trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MCY's competition here
SAFT vs KMPB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while KMPB trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPB's competition here
SAFT vs KMPR Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while KMPR trades at $60.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPR's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
SAFT vs PLMR Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while PLMR trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PLMR's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PD Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AHL-PD trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -83.05. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PD's competition here
SAFT vs AHL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AHL trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL's competition here
SAFT vs LMND Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while LMND trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check LMND's competition here
SAFT vs SKWD Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while SKWD trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SKWD's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AHL-PE trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.55. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PE's competition here
SAFT vs ROOT Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ROOT trades at $113.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ROOT's competition here
SAFT vs STC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while STC trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STC's competition here
SAFT vs HMN Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HMN trades at $41.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HMN's competition here
SAFT vs HCI Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HCI trades at $138.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HCI's competition here
SAFT vs MHLA Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while MHLA trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MHLA's competition here
SAFT vs PRA Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while PRA trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRA's competition here
SAFT vs BOW Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while BOW trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check BOW's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO's competition here
SAFT vs SIGIP Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while SIGIP trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGIP's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HGTY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY's competition here
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 695.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while UFCS trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UFCS's competition here
SAFT vs UVE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 662M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while UVE trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UVE's competition here
SAFT vs HRTG Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HRTG trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HRTG's competition here
SAFT vs DGICB Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 624.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while DGICB trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICB's competition here
SAFT vs DGICA Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 615.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while DGICA trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICA's competition here
SAFT vs ACIC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 507.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ACIC trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ACIC's competition here
SAFT vs GBLI Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while GBLI trades at $30.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLI's competition here
SAFT vs AII Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AII trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AII's competition here
SAFT vs UIHC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UIHC's competition here
SAFT vs NODK Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while NODK trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 44.90. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NODK's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 233.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while CNFRZ trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRZ's competition here
SAFT vs KINS Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while KINS trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KINS's competition here
SAFT vs CNFR Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while CNFR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFR's competition here
SAFT vs UNAM Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UNAM's competition here
SAFT vs HALL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HALL's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.19. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
SAFT vs STFC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STFC's competition here
SAFT vs AFHBL Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFHBL's competition here
SAFT vs Y Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check Y's competition here
SAFT vs FNHC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check FNHC's competition here
SAFT vs MILE Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILE's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PC's competition here
SAFT vs NSEC Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NSEC's competition here
SAFT vs MILEW Comparison July 2025
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.52, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILEW's competition here