B. Riley Financial, Inc. - 6.50
B. Riley Financial, Inc. - 6.50 (RILYN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RILYN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RILYN | $19.85 | +1.85% | 163.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.66 | -0.18% | 22.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.73% |
| VOYA | $72.91 | +2.75% | 7B | 14.41 | $5.06 | +2.47% |
| VOYA-PB | $24.65 | -0.16% | 6.8B | 2.92 | $8.44 | +2.47% |
| BIPH | $16.99 | +1.01% | 6.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.37% |
| PACS | $11.19 | -1.50% | 1.7B | 18.36 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $17.75 | +0.28% | 1.5B | 9.19 | $1.93 | +11.86% |
| TREE | $56.97 | +3.00% | 775.9M | -14.00 | -$4.07 | N/A |
| RILYM | $25.11 | +0.00% | 753M | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| BEAGU | $10.70 | -1.47% | 644.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RILYN vs TPGXL Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while TPGXL trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check TPGXL's competition here
RILYN vs VOYA Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while VOYA trades at $72.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check VOYA's competition here
RILYN vs VOYA-PB Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check VOYA-PB's competition here
RILYN vs BIPH Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BIPH trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BIPH's competition here
RILYN vs PACS Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while PACS trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check PACS's competition here
RILYN vs MSDL Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while MSDL trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check MSDL's competition here
RILYN vs TREE Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 775.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while TREE trades at $56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check TREE's competition here
RILYN vs RILYM Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYM's competition here
RILYN vs BEAGU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 644.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BEAGU trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BEAGU's competition here
RILYN vs RILYO Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYO's competition here
RILYN vs ANSCU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while ANSCU trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check ANSCU's competition here
RILYN vs BACQU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 392.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BACQU trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BACQU's competition here
RILYN vs POLEU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 340.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check POLEU's competition here
RILYN vs DRDBU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 322M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DRDBU trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DRDBU's competition here
RILYN vs PLMKU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while PLMKU trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check PLMKU's competition here
RILYN vs HVIIU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 271.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while HVIIU trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check HVIIU's competition here
RILYN vs HVII Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while HVII trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVII's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check HVII's competition here
RILYN vs FACTU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while FACTU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check FACTU's competition here
RILYN vs NTWOU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while NTWOU trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check NTWOU's competition here
RILYN vs PLMK Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while PLMK trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check PLMK's competition here
RILYN vs DMAAU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DMAAU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DMAAU's competition here
RILYN vs DRDB Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DRDB trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DRDB's competition here
RILYN vs RILYL Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYL trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYL's competition here
RILYN vs RILYP Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYP trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYP's competition here
RILYN vs SVCCU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while SVCCU trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check SVCCU's competition here
RILYN vs RILY Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILY trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILY's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILY's competition here
RILYN vs TAVIU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check TAVIU's competition here
RILYN vs RILYT Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYT trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYT's competition here
RILYN vs RANG Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 164.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RANG trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RANG's competition here
RILYN vs RILYG Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYG trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYG's competition here
RILYN vs RILYK Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYK trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYK's competition here
RILYN vs BSIIU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BSIIU's competition here
RILYN vs ACOG Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while ACOG trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check ACOG's competition here
RILYN vs SPHA Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check SPHA's competition here
RILYN vs NOEM Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while NOEM trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 252.00. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check NOEM's competition here
RILYN vs FSHPR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while FSHPR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check FSHPR's competition here
RILYN vs DTSQ Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DTSQ trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.71. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DTSQ's competition here
RILYN vs CAPNU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while CAPNU trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check CAPNU's competition here
RILYN vs RMI Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RMI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RMI's competition here
RILYN vs FLDD Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check FLDD's competition here
RILYN vs YHNA Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while YHNA trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 45.39. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check YHNA's competition here
RILYN vs BAYAU Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BAYAU trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BAYAU's competition here
RILYN vs COOTW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check COOTW's competition here
RILYN vs DRDBW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DRDBW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DRDBW's competition here
RILYN vs APLMW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while APLMW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check APLMW's competition here
RILYN vs HVIIR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while HVIIR trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check HVIIR's competition here
RILYN vs PLMKW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while PLMKW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check PLMKW's competition here
RILYN vs MLACR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while MLACR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check MLACR's competition here
RILYN vs BSLKW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BSLKW's competition here
RILYN vs TENKR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check TENKR's competition here
RILYN vs RANGR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RANGR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RANGR's competition here
RILYN vs NOEMR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while NOEMR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check NOEMR's competition here
RILYN vs DTSQR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while DTSQR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check DTSQR's competition here
RILYN vs EURKR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while EURKR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check EURKR's competition here
RILYN vs CAPNR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while CAPNR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check CAPNR's competition here
RILYN vs YHNAR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while YHNAR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check YHNAR's competition here
RILYN vs ATMCR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while ATMCR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check ATMCR's competition here
RILYN vs BRACR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BRACR's competition here
RILYN vs EMCGR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 452K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while EMCGR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check EMCGR's competition here
RILYN vs BIPJ Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while BIPJ trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check BIPJ's competition here
RILYN vs RILYH Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYH's competition here
RILYN vs SPHAR Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check SPHAR's competition here
RILYN vs RILYI Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check RILYI's competition here
RILYN vs LCAAW Comparison August 2025
RILYN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYN stands at 163.1M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYN is priced at $19.85, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYN's ROE is +4.72%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYN is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYN.Check LCAAW's competition here