B. Riley Financial, Inc. 5.00% Senior Notes due 2026
B. Riley Financial, Inc. 5.00% Senior Notes due 2026 RILYG Peers
See (RILYG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RILYG | $16.75 | +4.95% | 123.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.70 | -0.70% | 19.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| VOYA-PB | $24.42 | -0.85% | 7B | 2.89 | $8.44 | +2.48% |
| VOYA | $72.39 | -1.11% | 7B | 13.53 | $5.35 | +2.48% |
| BIPH | $16.52 | -0.42% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +9.51% |
| PACS | $12.68 | -0.86% | 2B | 20.80 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $19.25 | +0.31% | 1.7B | 8.76 | $2.20 | +11.40% |
| RILYM | $25.11 | +0.00% | 753M | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| BEAGU | $10.68 | +0.00% | 613.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RILYO | $25.13 | -0.02% | 573.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RILYG vs TPGXL Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while TPGXL trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs VOYA-PB Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs VOYA Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while VOYA trades at $72.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BIPH Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BIPH trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs PACS Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while PACS trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs MSDL Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while MSDL trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYM Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BEAGU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BEAGU trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYO Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs TREE Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while TREE trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs ANSCU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 461.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BACQU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BACQU trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs POLEU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DRDBU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DRDBU trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs HVIIU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while HVIIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs HVII Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while HVII trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs PLMKU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while PLMKU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs FACTU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while FACTU trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs NTWOU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while NTWOU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs PLMK Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while PLMK trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DMAAU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DMAAU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DRDB Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DRDB trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs TAVIU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs ACOG Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while ACOG trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RANG Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RANG trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs SVCCU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while SVCCU trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BSIIU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYL Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 140.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYL trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYP Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYP trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILY Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILY trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILY's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYT Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYT trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYN Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYN trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs SPHA Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYK Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYK trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs NOEM Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while NOEM trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 252.00. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DTSQ Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DTSQ trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RMI Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RMI trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs FLDD Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs CAPNU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while CAPNU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs YHNA Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while YHNA trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BAYAU Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs COOTW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DRDBW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DRDBW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BSLKW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs MLACR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while MLACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs HVIIR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while HVIIR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs PLMKW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while PLMKW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs APLMW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while APLMW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RANGR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RANGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs TENKR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs NOEMR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while NOEMR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs EURKR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while EURKR trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs DTSQR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while DTSQR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs FSHPR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while FSHPR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs YHNAR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while YHNAR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs CAPNR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while CAPNR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs ATMCR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 819.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while ATMCR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BRACR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs EMCGR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 484.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while EMCGR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs SPHAR Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs LCAAW Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs BIPJ Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while BIPJ trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYI Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.
RILYG vs RILYH Comparison
RILYG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYG stands at 123.3M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYG is priced at $16.75, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, RILYG's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYG is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYG.