Papa John's International, Inc.
Papa John's International, Inc. PZZA Peers
See (PZZA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PZZA | $40.27 | -2.85% | 1.32B | 16.99 | $2.37 | +4.59% |
| MCD | $307.45 | -0.40% | 219.85B | 27.14 | $11.33 | +2.23% |
| SBUX | $86.54 | -0.40% | 98.34B | 31.47 | $2.75 | +2.71% |
| CMG | $52.25 | +3.16% | 70.40B | 46.24 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.16 | -0.38% | 40.35B | 28.92 | $5.02 | +1.87% |
| DRI | $207.44 | +1.19% | 24.28B | 23.33 | $8.89 | +2.70% |
| QSR | $68.00 | +0.24% | 22.28B | 23.05 | $2.95 | +3.48% |
| YUMC | $46.91 | +1.78% | 17.51B | 19.63 | $2.39 | +1.54% |
| DPZ | $483.23 | -0.24% | 16.55B | 27.69 | $17.45 | +1.29% |
| TXRH | $189.10 | -0.74% | 12.55B | 29.18 | $6.48 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
PZZA vs MCD Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 219.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while MCD trades at $307.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs SBUX Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 98.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while SBUX trades at $86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CMG Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 70.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CMG trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs YUM Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while YUM trades at $145.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs DRI Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while DRI trades at $207.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs QSR Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while QSR trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs YUMC Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while YUMC trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs DPZ Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while DPZ trades at $483.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs TXRH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while TXRH trades at $189.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BROS Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BROS trades at $71.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 184.36. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CAVA Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 11.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CAVA trades at $99.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 90.55. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs WING Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while WING trades at $306.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs EAT Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while EAT trades at $150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs SHAK Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while SHAK trades at $99.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CAKE Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CAKE trades at $54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs WEN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while WEN trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs SG Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while SG trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -20.28. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs ARCO Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while ARCO trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs HDL Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while HDL trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CBRL Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CBRL trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CNNE Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CNNE trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FWRG Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FWRG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 102.12. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BJRI Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 963.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BJRI trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 45.40. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs TWNPV Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs KRUS Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 845.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while KRUS trades at $69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -76.05. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs PTLO Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 804.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while PTLO trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BLMN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 740.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BLMN trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BH-A Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 738.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BH-A trades at $1,189.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 733.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BH trades at $237.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs RUTH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CHUY Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs TAST Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs JACK Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 484.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while JACK trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs NATH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 416.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while NATH trades at $101.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs RICK Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 387.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while RICK trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 77.19. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs DIN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 385.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while DIN trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs TWNP Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 334.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while TWNP trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs PBPB Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 307.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while PBPB trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs VENU Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 295.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while VENU trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs LOCO Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 285.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while LOCO trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs DENN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 227.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while DENN trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FRGI Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BBQ Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs GENK Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 138.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while GENK trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GENK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs STKS Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 130.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while STKS trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs THCHW Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs THCH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 89.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while THCH trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs MB Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 73.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while MB trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FATBW Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 69.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FATBW trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs GRIL Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FATAV Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs RRGB Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 53.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while RRGB trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FATBB Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 49.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FATBB trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FATBP Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 47.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FATBP trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FAT Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 46.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FAT trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BDL Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 44.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BDL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs ARKR Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 38.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while ARKR trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs NDLS Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 38.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while NDLS trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs RAVE Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 37.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while RAVE trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs YOSH Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 24.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while YOSH trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs MYT Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs GTIM Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while GTIM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs CHSN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 14.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while CHSN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs PC Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 14.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while PC trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs REBN Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.71M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while REBN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BTBDW Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BTBD Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BTBD trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BTB Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs FATBV Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BFI Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs PNST Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while PNST trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs BFIIW Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.
PZZA vs ONDR Comparison
PZZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PZZA stands at 1.32B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, PZZA is priced at $40.27, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PZZA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.99, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PZZA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PZZA is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PZZA.