Quanta Services, Inc.
Quanta Services, Inc. PWR Peers
See (PWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | $359.59 | +0.13% | 53.3B | 58.00 | $6.20 | +0.11% |
| EME | $484.44 | +0.37% | 21.7B | 21.41 | $22.63 | +0.21% |
| FIX | $499.55 | +0.18% | 17.6B | 29.91 | $16.70 | +0.30% |
| J | $125.05 | -0.44% | 15B | 41.27 | $3.03 | +0.94% |
| ACM | $110.66 | -0.13% | 14.6B | 23.70 | $4.67 | +0.87% |
| APG | $47.90 | +0.84% | 13.5B | 78.52 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MTZ | $159.54 | +1.21% | 12.6B | 58.87 | $2.71 | N/A |
| STN | $105.23 | -0.42% | 12B | 42.78 | $2.46 | +0.58% |
| TTEK | $35.24 | -0.23% | 9.3B | 51.07 | $0.69 | +0.68% |
| BLD | $301.22 | +4.21% | 8.6B | 15.27 | $19.73 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PWR vs EME Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while EME trades at $484.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs FIX Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while FIX trades at $499.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs J Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while J trades at $125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas J's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ACM Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ACM trades at $110.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs APG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while APG trades at $47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 78.52. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs MTZ Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while MTZ trades at $159.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs STN Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while STN trades at $105.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs TTEK Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while TTEK trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs BLD Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while BLD trades at $301.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs FLR Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while FLR trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs DY Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while DY trades at $237.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs KBR Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while KBR trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ROAD Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ROAD trades at $108.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 93.25. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs STRL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while STRL trades at $195.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs IESC Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while IESC trades at $270.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs PRIM Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while PRIM trades at $73.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs GVA Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while GVA trades at $90.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs AGX Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while AGX trades at $235.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ECG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ECG trades at $60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs MYRG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while MYRG trades at $164.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 76.17. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs TPC Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while TPC trades at $38.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs LMB Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while LMB trades at $134.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs NVEE Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while NVEE trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs WLDN Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 807.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while WLDN trades at $55.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs GLDD Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 782.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while GLDD trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs AMRC Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 781.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while AMRC trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs BWMN Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 459.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while BWMN trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs BBCP Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while BBCP trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ORN Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 342.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ORN trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 86.60. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs MTRX Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 340.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while MTRX trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SKBL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SKBL trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 342.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs RITR Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while RITR trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs JUNE Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while JUNE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SLND Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SLND trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ESOA Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ESOA trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs AENZ Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs MIMI Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while MIMI trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 200.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs CSLRW Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs OEG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs BLNK Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while BLNK trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs VATE Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while VATE trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs MSW Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while MSW trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs AGFY Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while AGFY trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SHIM Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SHIM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ONEG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ONEG trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs DRTT Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs PGHL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs FGL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while FGL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs WXM Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while WXM trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SKK Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SKK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs WLMS Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs FBGL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while FBGL trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs ENG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SUNE Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SUNE trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs WLGS Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while WLGS trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs OIG Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs SCCI Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PWR has daily volatility of 1.55 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.
PWR vs ATCX Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while ATCX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs IEA Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.
PWR vs HIL Comparison
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 53.3B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $359.59, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 58.00, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.