Quanta Services, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PWR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PWR
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | $560.63 | +0.09% | 83.9B | 82.69 | $6.78 | +0.07% |
| FIX | $1,417.19 | -0.79% | 50B | 49.02 | $28.91 | +0.16% |
| FER | $66.47 | -0.82% | 48.2B | 47.48 | $1.40 | +1.51% |
| EME | $756.30 | -0.43% | 33.9B | 26.84 | $28.18 | +0.15% |
| MTZ | $336.25 | +0.74% | 26.5B | 66.32 | $5.07 | N/A |
| APG | $42.03 | +1.20% | 18.1B | -60.91 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| J | $128.05 | -0.29% | 15.1B | 33.79 | $3.79 | +1.03% |
| STRL | $416.34 | -1.17% | 12.8B | 44.43 | $9.37 | N/A |
| ACM | $84.71 | -1.16% | 11B | 18.74 | $4.52 | +1.35% |
| DY | $348.15 | +0.20% | 10.4B | 36.46 | $9.55 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PWR vs FIX Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while FIX trades at $1,417.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FIX's competition here
PWR vs FER Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while FER trades at $66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FER's competition here
PWR vs EME Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while EME trades at $756.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check EME's competition here
PWR vs MTZ Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MTZ trades at $336.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTZ's competition here
PWR vs APG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while APG trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -60.91. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check APG's competition here
PWR vs J Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while J trades at $128.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas J's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to J's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check J's competition here
PWR vs STRL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while STRL trades at $416.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 44.43. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STRL's competition here
PWR vs ACM Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ACM trades at $84.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ACM's competition here
PWR vs DY Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while DY trades at $348.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DY's competition here
PWR vs BLD Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while BLD trades at $356.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLD's competition here
PWR vs STN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while STN trades at $87.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STN's competition here
PWR vs IESC Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while IESC trades at $482.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IESC's competition here
PWR vs TTEK Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while TTEK trades at $31.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TTEK's competition here
PWR vs AGX Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while AGX trades at $575.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 59.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGX's competition here
PWR vs PRIM Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while PRIM trades at $147.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PRIM's competition here
PWR vs FLR Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while FLR trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is -152.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FLR's competition here
PWR vs ECG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ECG trades at $123.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ECG's competition here
PWR vs LGN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while LGN trades at $58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -102.95. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LGN's competition here
PWR vs ROAD Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ROAD trades at $105.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ROAD's competition here
PWR vs GVA Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while GVA trades at $121.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GVA's competition here
PWR vs KBR Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while KBR trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check KBR's competition here
PWR vs MYRG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MYRG trades at $285.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MYRG's competition here
PWR vs TPC Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while TPC trades at $77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TPC's competition here
PWR vs NVEE Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check NVEE's competition here
PWR vs AMRC Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while AMRC trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AMRC's competition here
PWR vs WLDN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while WLDN trades at $80.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLDN's competition here
PWR vs JUNE Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JUNE's competition here
PWR vs GLDD Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GLDD's competition here
PWR vs LMB Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 939.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while LMB trades at $80.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LMB's competition here
PWR vs BWMN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 507.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while BWMN trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BWMN's competition here
PWR vs ORN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 460.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ORN trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 191.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ORN's competition here
PWR vs BBCP Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while BBCP trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 77.56. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BBCP's competition here
PWR vs MTRX Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 328.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MTRX trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTRX's competition here
PWR vs ESOA Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ESOA trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 100.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ESOA's competition here
PWR vs MAGH Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MAGH's competition here
PWR vs AENZ Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AENZ's competition here
PWR vs SHIM Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 141.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SHIM trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SHIM's competition here
PWR vs CSLRW Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CSLRW's competition here
PWR vs JLHL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while JLHL trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JLHL's competition here
PWR vs OEG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OEG's competition here
PWR vs VATE Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while VATE trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check VATE's competition here
PWR vs AGFY Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGFY's competition here
PWR vs SKBL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SKBL trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 162.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKBL's competition here
PWR vs SLND Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SLND trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLND's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SLND's competition here
PWR vs BLNK Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while BLNK trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLNK's competition here
PWR vs DRTT Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DRTT's competition here
PWR vs RITR Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while RITR trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check RITR's competition here
PWR vs ONEG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ONEG trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -104.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ONEG's competition here
PWR vs PGHL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PGHL's competition here
PWR vs MSW Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MSW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MSW's competition here
PWR vs OFAL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while OFAL trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OFAL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OFAL's competition here
PWR vs WLMS Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLMS's competition here
PWR vs FBGL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while FBGL trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FBGL's competition here
PWR vs MIMI Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MIMI trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MIMI's competition here
PWR vs SUNE Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SUNE trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SUNE's competition here
PWR vs ENG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ENG's competition here
PWR vs SKK Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SKK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKK's competition here
PWR vs WXM Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while WXM trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WXM's competition here
PWR vs MGN Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while MGN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MGN's competition here
PWR vs BNC Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while BNC trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BNC's competition here
PWR vs OIG Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OIG's competition here
PWR vs WLGS Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLGS's competition here
PWR vs FGL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 453.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while FGL trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FGL's competition here
PWR vs IEAWW Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEAWW's competition here
PWR vs IEA Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEA's competition here
PWR vs CBI Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CBI's competition here
PWR vs SCCI Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PWR has daily volatility of 4.99 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here
PWR vs HIL Comparison April 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 83.9B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $560.63, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 82.69, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check HIL's competition here