Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62
Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62 PRS Peers
See (PRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRS | $23.78 | +1.15% | 38B | N/A | N/A | +5.92% |
| AFL | $103.92 | -1.46% | 57.2B | 16.45 | $6.43 | +2.04% |
| MFC | $31.39 | -1.80% | 54.8B | 16.58 | $1.93 | +3.85% |
| MET | $79.63 | -0.99% | 54.4B | 13.25 | $6.12 | +2.71% |
| MET-PE | $23.80 | +0.87% | 53.3B | 3.05 | $7.81 | +2.71% |
| MET-PA | $23.25 | +0.30% | 52.8B | 2.99 | $7.81 | +2.71% |
| PRU | $107.95 | +0.47% | 38.6B | 17.19 | $6.34 | +4.86% |
| PRH | $25.17 | +0.97% | 38.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.92% |
| PUK | $24.48 | -2.18% | 31.9B | 14.75 | $1.68 | +1.87% |
| UNM | $81.03 | +0.33% | 14.3B | 9.68 | $8.48 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
PRS vs AFL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while AFL trades at $103.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MFC trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MET trades at $79.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PE Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MET-PE trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MET-PA trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRU Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while PRU trades at $107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while PRH trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PUK Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while PUK trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs UNM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while UNM trades at $81.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MET-PF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while GL trades at $121.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while GL-PD trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while PRI trades at $276.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while JXN trades at $88.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.67. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while LNC trades at $34.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while LNC-PD trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FG Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while FG trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FGN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while FGN trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CNO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while CNO trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GNW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while GNW trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHFAL trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAP Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHFAP trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHF trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PB Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs NWLI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while JXN-PA trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MHNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MHNC trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHFAO trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 860M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHFAN trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 760.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while BHFAM trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while ABLLW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 506.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while ABL trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 497.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while ABLLL trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CIA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while CIA trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs VERY Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MDWT Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AAME Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while AAME trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GWGH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs IHC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 38B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.78, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.