Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62
Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62 PRS Peers
See (PRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRS | $24.07 | -0.21% | 37.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.83% |
| MET-PA | $23.99 | -0.04% | 55B | 3.08 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| AFL | $102.56 | +0.72% | 54.7B | 15.73 | $6.43 | +2.12% |
| MET-PE | $24.00 | +0.38% | 53.7B | 3.06 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| MFC | $30.81 | -0.05% | 52.3B | 15.73 | $1.94 | +4.01% |
| MET | $77.44 | +0.37% | 51.3B | 12.48 | $6.12 | +3.58% |
| PRH | $25.33 | -0.15% | 38.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| PRU | $104.16 | +0.86% | 36.2B | 16.11 | $6.34 | +5.15% |
| PUK | $24.92 | +1.08% | 31.9B | 14.73 | $1.68 | +1.86% |
| UNM | $80.74 | -0.47% | 13.9B | 9.40 | $8.48 | +2.55% |
Stock Comparison
PRS vs MET-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MET-PA trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AFL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while AFL trades at $102.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PE Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MET-PE trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MFC trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MET trades at $77.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while PRH trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRU Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while PRU trades at $104.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PUK Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while PUK trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs UNM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while UNM trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MET-PF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while GL-PD trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while GL trades at $122.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while PRI trades at $266.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while JXN trades at $89.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while LNC trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while LNC-PD trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FGN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while FGN trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FG Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while FG trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CNO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while CNO trades at $37.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GNW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while GNW trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHFAL trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHF trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAP Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHFAP trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while JXN-PA trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PB Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs NWLI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MHNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MHNC trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHFAO trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 710.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHFAN trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while BHFAM trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while ABL trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while ABLLL trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while ABLLW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CIA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while CIA trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs VERY Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MDWT Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AAME Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while AAME trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GWGH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs IHC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.5B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $24.07, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.