Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62
Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.62 PRS Peers
See (PRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRS | $23.51 | -0.11% | 37.4B | N/A | N/A | +5.98% |
| AFL | $103.67 | +1.43% | 56B | 16.12 | $6.43 | +2.09% |
| MFC | $32.45 | +1.25% | 55.6B | 16.90 | $1.92 | +3.77% |
| MET | $79.92 | +1.73% | 53.7B | 13.06 | $6.12 | +2.76% |
| MET-PE | $23.62 | -0.17% | 52.8B | 3.03 | $7.81 | +2.76% |
| MET-PA | $23.90 | -0.25% | 52.8B | 3.06 | $7.81 | +2.76% |
| PRU | $105.58 | +1.78% | 37.4B | 16.65 | $6.34 | +5.03% |
| PRH | $25.01 | +0.06% | 37.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.97% |
| PUK | $23.73 | +1.11% | 30.6B | 14.13 | $1.68 | +1.95% |
| UNM | $81.49 | +1.84% | 14.2B | 9.69 | $8.41 | +2.06% |
Stock Comparison
PRS vs AFL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while AFL trades at $103.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MFC trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MET trades at $79.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PE Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MET-PE trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MET-PA trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRU Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while PRU trades at $105.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while PRH trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PUK Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while PUK trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs UNM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while UNM trades at $81.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MET-PF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MET-PF trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while GL-PD trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while GL trades at $121.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs PRI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while PRI trades at $271.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while JXN trades at $83.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 63.27. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while LNC trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LNC-PD Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while LNC-PD trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FG Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while FG trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs FGN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while FGN trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CNO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while CNO trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHF Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHF trades at $59.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAP Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHFAP trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHFAL trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GNW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while GNW trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs JXN-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while JXN-PA trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PB Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs NWLI Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AEL-PA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MHNC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MHNC trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAO Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHFAO trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAN Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 987.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHFAN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs BHFAM Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 883M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while BHFAM trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLW Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 642.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while ABLLW trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while ABL trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -22.41. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs ABLLL Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while ABLLL trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs CIA Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while CIA trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs VERY Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs MDWT Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs AAME Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while AAME trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs LFC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs GWGH Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.
PRS vs IHC Comparison
PRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRS is priced at $23.51, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PRS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRS is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRS.