Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.95
Prudential Financial, Inc. 5.95 PRH Peers
See (PRH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRH | $25.31 | +0.12% | 36.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| AFL | $102.69 | +1.55% | 55.5B | 15.97 | $6.43 | +2.12% |
| MFC | $30.80 | +0.95% | 52.8B | 15.88 | $1.94 | +4.01% |
| MET | $77.49 | +1.52% | 52B | 12.66 | $6.12 | +3.58% |
| MET-PE | $23.98 | +0.25% | 51.2B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| MET-PA | $23.96 | -0.21% | 51.1B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| PRS | $24.06 | -0.01% | 37.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.83% |
| PRU | $104.22 | +2.07% | 36.9B | 16.44 | $6.34 | +5.15% |
| PUK | $24.92 | +0.73% | 32B | 14.83 | $1.68 | +1.86% |
| UNM | $80.51 | +0.93% | 14B | 9.49 | $8.48 | +2.55% |
Stock Comparison
PRH vs AFL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while AFL trades at $102.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MFC Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MFC trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MET Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MET trades at $77.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MET-PE Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MET-PE trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MET-PA Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MET-PA trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs PRS Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while PRS trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs PRU Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while PRU trades at $104.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs PUK Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while PUK trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs UNM Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while UNM trades at $80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MET-PF Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MET-PF trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs GL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while GL trades at $122.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs GL-PD Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while GL-PD trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs PRI Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while PRI trades at $266.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs JXN Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while JXN trades at $88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.09. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs LNC Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while LNC trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs LNC-PD Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while LNC-PD trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs AEL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs FG Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while FG trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs FGN Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while FGN trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs CNO Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while CNO trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs GNW Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while GNW trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHF Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHF trades at $50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHFAL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHFAL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHFAP Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHFAP trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs JXN-PA Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while JXN-PA trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs AEL-PB Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs NWLI Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs AEL-PA Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MHNC Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MHNC trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHFAO Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 894.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHFAO trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHFAN Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 710.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHFAN trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs BHFAM Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 617.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while BHFAM trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs ABLLW Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while ABLLW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs ABL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while ABL trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs ABLLL Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while ABLLL trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs CIA Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while CIA trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs VERY Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs MDWT Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs AAME Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while AAME trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs IHC Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs GWGH Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.
PRH vs LFC Comparison
PRH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRH stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRH is priced at $25.31, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRH's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRH is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRH.