Plum Acquisition Corp. IV
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV (PLMKW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PLMKW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMKW | $0.27 | +0.00% | 5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.67 | +0.34% | 21.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.99% |
| VOYA-PB | $24.55 | +1.11% | 6.9B | 2.91 | $8.44 | +2.54% |
| VOYA | $71.06 | -0.11% | 6.8B | 13.28 | $5.35 | +2.54% |
| BIPH | $17.05 | +0.95% | 6.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.31% |
| PACS | $11.53 | -1.96% | 1.8B | 18.90 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $19.18 | +0.10% | 1.7B | 8.80 | $2.18 | +11.46% |
| RILYM | $25.11 | +0.00% | 753M | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| BEAGU | $10.74 | +0.00% | 644.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TREE | $47.44 | -1.58% | 642.1M | -11.46 | -$4.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLMKW vs TPGXL Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while TPGXL trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check TPGXL's competition here
PLMKW vs VOYA-PB Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check VOYA-PB's competition here
PLMKW vs VOYA Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while VOYA trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check VOYA's competition here
PLMKW vs BIPH Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BIPH trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BIPH's competition here
PLMKW vs PACS Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while PACS trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check PACS's competition here
PLMKW vs MSDL Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while MSDL trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check MSDL's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYM Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW and RILYM have similar daily volatility (0.04).Check RILYM's competition here
PLMKW vs BEAGU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 644.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BEAGU trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BEAGU's competition here
PLMKW vs TREE Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while TREE trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check TREE's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYO Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYO's competition here
PLMKW vs ANSCU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check ANSCU's competition here
PLMKW vs BACQU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 398.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BACQU trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BACQU's competition here
PLMKW vs POLEU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check POLEU's competition here
PLMKW vs DRDBU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DRDBU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DRDBU's competition here
PLMKW vs PLMKU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while PLMKU trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check PLMKU's competition here
PLMKW vs HVIIU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 274.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while HVIIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check HVIIU's competition here
PLMKW vs DMAAU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DMAAU trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DMAAU's competition here
PLMKW vs HVII Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while HVII trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check HVII's competition here
PLMKW vs FACTU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while FACTU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check FACTU's competition here
PLMKW vs NTWOU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while NTWOU trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check NTWOU's competition here
PLMKW vs PLMK Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while PLMK trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check PLMK's competition here
PLMKW vs DRDB Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DRDB trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DRDB's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYL Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 207.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYL trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYL's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYL's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYP Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 186M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYP trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYP's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYP's competition here
PLMKW vs SVCCU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while SVCCU trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check SVCCU's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYG Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYG trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYG's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYT Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYT trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYT's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYT's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYN Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYN trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYN's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYN's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYK Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYK trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYK's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYK's competition here
PLMKW vs RILY Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILY's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILY's competition here
PLMKW vs RANG Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RANG trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RANG's competition here
PLMKW vs TAVIU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check TAVIU's competition here
PLMKW vs BSIIU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BSIIU's competition here
PLMKW vs ACOG Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while ACOG trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check ACOG's competition here
PLMKW vs SPHA Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check SPHA's competition here
PLMKW vs NOEM Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while NOEM trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 252.25. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check NOEM's competition here
PLMKW vs DTSQ Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DTSQ trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DTSQ's competition here
PLMKW vs CAPNU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while CAPNU trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check CAPNU's competition here
PLMKW vs RMI Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RMI trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RMI's competition here
PLMKW vs FLDD Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check FLDD's competition here
PLMKW vs YHNA Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while YHNA trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check YHNA's competition here
PLMKW vs BAYAU Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BAYAU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BAYAU's competition here
PLMKW vs COOTW Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check COOTW's competition here
PLMKW vs DRDBW Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DRDBW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DRDBW's competition here
PLMKW vs MLACR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while MLACR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check MLACR's competition here
PLMKW vs BSLKW Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BSLKW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BSLKW's competition here
PLMKW vs APLMW Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while APLMW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check APLMW's competition here
PLMKW vs HVIIR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while HVIIR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check HVIIR's competition here
PLMKW vs TENKR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check TENKR's competition here
PLMKW vs RANGR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RANGR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RANGR's competition here
PLMKW vs NOEMR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while NOEMR trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check NOEMR's competition here
PLMKW vs DTSQR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while DTSQR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check DTSQR's competition here
PLMKW vs EURKR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while EURKR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check EURKR's competition here
PLMKW vs CAPNR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while CAPNR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check CAPNR's competition here
PLMKW vs YHNAR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while YHNAR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check YHNAR's competition here
PLMKW vs FSHPR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while FSHPR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check FSHPR's competition here
PLMKW vs ATMCR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 902.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while ATMCR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check ATMCR's competition here
PLMKW vs EMCGR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 587.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while EMCGR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is more volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check EMCGR's competition here
PLMKW vs BRACR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BRACR's competition here
PLMKW vs SPHAR Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check SPHAR's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYI Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYI's competition here
PLMKW vs RILYH Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYH's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check RILYH's competition here
PLMKW vs BIPJ Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while BIPJ trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check BIPJ's competition here
PLMKW vs LCAAW Comparison July 2025
PLMKW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMKW stands at 5M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMKW is priced at $0.27, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMKW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMKW's ROE is N/A, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMKW is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMKW.Check LCAAW's competition here