Plum Acquisition Corp. IV
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV PLMK Peers
See (PLMK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMK | $10.20 | +0.10% | 246.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $24.21 | +0.67% | 17.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.58% |
| VOYA-PB | $23.93 | +0.55% | 6.4B | 2.84 | $8.44 | +2.72% |
| VOYA | $65.62 | -1.99% | 6.3B | 12.27 | $5.35 | +2.72% |
| BIPH | $16.23 | +0.76% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.68% |
| MSDL | $19.50 | -0.66% | 1.7B | 8.94 | $2.18 | +11.31% |
| PACS | $10.16 | -0.38% | 1.6B | 16.66 | $0.61 | N/A |
| RILYM | $25.11 | N/A | 753M | N/A | N/A | +4.76% |
| BEAGU | $10.79 | +0.84% | 637.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RILYO | $25.13 | -0.02% | 573.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLMK vs TPGXL Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while TPGXL trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs VOYA-PB Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while VOYA-PB trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs VOYA Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while VOYA trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BIPH Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BIPH trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs MSDL Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while MSDL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs PACS Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while PACS trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYM Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BEAGU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 637.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BEAGU trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYO Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs TREE Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while TREE trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs ANSCU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BACQU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 354.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BACQU trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DRDBU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 320.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DRDBU trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs POLEU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 312.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while POLEU trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs HVIIU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while HVIIU trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs HVII Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 262.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while HVII trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs FACTU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while FACTU trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs PLMKU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while PLMKU trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs NTWOU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while NTWOU trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DMAAU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DMAAU trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DRDB Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DRDB trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BSIIU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs TAVIU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while TAVIU trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RANG Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RANG trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs SVCCU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while SVCCU trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +25.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs ACOG Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while ACOG trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs SPHA Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYT Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYT trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYG Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYG trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs NOEM Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while NOEM trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 249.75. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DTSQ Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DTSQ trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYK Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYK trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYN Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYN trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RMI Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RMI trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILY Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILY's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs FLDD Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs YHNA Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while YHNA trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs CAPNU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while CAPNU trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYL Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYL trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYP Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYP trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BAYAU Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs ATMCR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while ATMCR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DRDBW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DRDBW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs APLMW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while APLMW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs MLACR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while MLACR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs PLMKW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while PLMKW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RANGR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RANGR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs TENKR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs EURKR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while EURKR trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs NOEMR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while NOEMR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs YHNAR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while YHNAR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs CAPNR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while CAPNR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs FSHPR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while FSHPR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs DTSQR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 963.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while DTSQR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs EMCGR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 562.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while EMCGR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BRACR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs HVIIR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 525.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while HVIIR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs COOTW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 465.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COOTW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BSLKW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYH Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs RILYI Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs BIPJ Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while BIPJ trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs LCAAW Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.
PLMK vs SPHAR Comparison
PLMK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLMK stands at 246.8M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLMK is priced at $10.20, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLMK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLMK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLMK is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLMK.