Piccadily Agro Industries Limited

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 675.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,311.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 674.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,311.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 544.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while UPL.NS trades at ₹765.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 500.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while FACT.BO trades at ₹784.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1646.49. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 500.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while FACT.NS trades at ₹783.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1646.17. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 473.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹3,015.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 473.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹3,016.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,774.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹410.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 38.65. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹410.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 182.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹458.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹458.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹895.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,173.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,171.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹118.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹118.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RCF.BO trades at ₹131.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RCF.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RCF.NS trades at ₹131.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RCF.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹173.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹173.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹282.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹282.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,107.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹838.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹459.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NFL.NS trades at ₹79.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NFL.BO trades at ₹79.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,347.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹510.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹142.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -66.95. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹141.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -66.88. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹204.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 204.25. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹206.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 201.55. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while IPL.BO trades at ₹160.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check IPL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹617.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while IPL.NS trades at ₹160.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹615.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹70.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹70.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹639.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹641.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,623.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,623.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MOL.NS trades at ₹51.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MOL.BO trades at ₹51.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MOL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹70.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹70.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹92.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹233.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹418.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹211.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹210.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹235.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹233.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KSE.BO trades at ₹223.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹166.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.05. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹266.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹59.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹59.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹142.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹141.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹298.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹344.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹334.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹65.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹140.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹157.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹145.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹145.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹146.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹146.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -152.67. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -151.67. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹30.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 261.29. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while MSL.BO trades at ₹137.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check MSL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SPTRSHI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SPTRSHI.BO trades at ₹45.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SPTRSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 50.92. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPTRSHI.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to SPTRSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SPTRSHI.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹468.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹31.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹270.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is 159.75. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹72.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹32.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 81.98. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NARMADA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while NARMADA.BO trades at ₹32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas NARMADA.BO's P/E ratio is 81.95. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NARMADA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to NARMADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check NARMADA.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PARVATI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while PARVATI.BO trades at ₹8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas PARVATI.BO's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PARVATI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to PARVATI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check PARVATI.BO's competition here

PICCADIL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PICCADIL.BO stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BNALTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PICCADIL.BO is priced at ₹606.75, while BNALTD.BO trades at ₹395.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PICCADIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.27, whereas BNALTD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, PICCADIL.BO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNALTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PICCADIL.BO is more volatile compared to BNALTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PICCADIL.BO.Check BNALTD.BO's competition here