The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | $149.02 | +0.35% | 347B | 21.47 | $6.94 | +2.85% |
| UL | $60.55 | +0.02% | 130.6B | 19.94 | $3.04 | +3.75% |
| CL | $92.07 | +1.11% | 73.6B | 24.54 | $3.75 | +2.29% |
| KVUE | $19.13 | +0.90% | 36.7B | 16.49 | $1.16 | +4.35% |
| KMB | $109.37 | +1.17% | 36.3B | 18.03 | $6.07 | +4.65% |
| EL | $80.54 | -1.18% | 29.1B | 36.40 | $2.21 | +1.75% |
| CHD | $99.58 | +1.46% | 23.6B | 27.94 | $3.56 | +1.22% |
| SGI | $77.94 | -0.83% | 16.4B | 27.95 | $2.79 | +0.82% |
| CLX | $97.54 | +2.38% | 11.8B | 14.45 | $6.75 | +5.10% |
| REYN | $26.82 | +1.94% | 5.7B | 15.98 | $1.68 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
PG vs UL Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while UL trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UL's competition here
PG vs CL Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while CL trades at $92.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CL's competition here
PG vs KVUE Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while KVUE trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KVUE's competition here
PG vs KMB Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while KMB trades at $109.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KMB's competition here
PG vs EL Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while EL trades at $80.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas EL's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EL's competition here
PG vs CHD Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while CHD trades at $99.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CHD's competition here
PG vs SGI Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while SGI trades at $77.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SGI's competition here
PG vs CLX Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while CLX trades at $97.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CLX's competition here
PG vs REYN Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while REYN trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check REYN's competition here
PG vs NTCO Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NTCO's competition here
PG vs ELF Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while ELF trades at $67.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ELF's competition here
PG vs IPAR Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while IPAR trades at $107.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check IPAR's competition here
PG vs NWL Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while NWL trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NWL's competition here
PG vs SPB Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while SPB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SPB's competition here
PG vs COTY Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while COTY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check COTY's competition here
PG vs EPC Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while EPC trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EPC's competition here
PG vs HELE Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 660.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while HELE trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check HELE's competition here
PG vs EWCZ Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EWCZ's competition here
PG vs NUS Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while NUS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NUS's competition here
PG vs PTNM Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PTNM's competition here
PG vs ACU Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while ACU trades at $48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ACU's competition here
PG vs SKIN Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while SKIN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SKIN's competition here
PG vs SLSN Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while SLSN trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 73.99. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SLSN's competition here
PG vs GROV Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while GROV trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV's competition here
PG vs AXIL Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while AXIL trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check AXIL's competition here
PG vs UG Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while UG trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UG's competition here
PG vs DSY Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while DSY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check DSY's competition here
PG vs PHH Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PHH's competition here
PG vs MTEX Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while MTEX trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check MTEX's competition here
PG vs BRSH Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSH's competition here
PG vs TANH Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while TANH trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TANH's competition here
PG vs TKLF Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 842.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while TKLF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TKLF's competition here
PG vs BRSHW Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSHW's competition here
PG vs RDEN Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check RDEN's competition here
PG vs GROV-WT Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV-WT's competition here
PG vs REV Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check REV's competition here
PG vs SUMR Comparison July 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 347B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $149.02, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 21.47, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SUMR's competition here