Inter Parfums, Inc.
Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | $91.69 | +0.54% | 2.9B | 17.42 | $5.24 | +3.51% |
| PG | $150.70 | +1.70% | 346.8B | 21.95 | $6.76 | +2.87% |
| UL | $57.82 | -0.54% | 125.7B | 18.98 | $3.03 | +3.97% |
| CL | $85.60 | +1.12% | 67.5B | 32.01 | $2.63 | +2.49% |
| KVUE | $17.76 | +1.63% | 33.7B | 23.07 | $0.76 | +4.73% |
| KMB | $99.86 | +2.05% | 32.6B | 20.22 | $4.86 | +5.16% |
| EL | $76.24 | -2.03% | 27.9B | -151.65 | -$0.51 | +1.82% |
| CHD | $97.77 | +2.89% | 22.6B | 31.59 | $3.02 | +1.25% |
| SGI | $77.95 | -1.40% | 16.7B | 43.28 | $1.84 | +0.77% |
| CLX | $97.25 | -1.45% | 11.7B | 15.82 | $6.11 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
IPAR vs PG Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 346.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while PG trades at $150.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PG's competition here
IPAR vs UL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while UL trades at $57.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UL's competition here
IPAR vs CL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while CL trades at $85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CL's competition here
IPAR vs KVUE Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while KVUE trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KVUE's competition here
IPAR vs KMB Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while KMB trades at $99.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KMB's competition here
IPAR vs EL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while EL trades at $76.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -151.65. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EL's competition here
IPAR vs CHD Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while CHD trades at $97.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CHD's competition here
IPAR vs SGI Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while SGI trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 43.28. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SGI's competition here
IPAR vs CLX Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while CLX trades at $97.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CLX's competition here
IPAR vs NTCO Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NTCO's competition here
IPAR vs ELF Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while ELF trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ELF's competition here
IPAR vs COTY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while COTY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check COTY's competition here
IPAR vs SPB Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while SPB trades at $83.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SPB's competition here
IPAR vs NWL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while NWL trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NWL's competition here
IPAR vs EPC Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while EPC trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EPC's competition here
IPAR vs HELE Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 544M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while HELE trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check HELE's competition here
IPAR vs NUS Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 367.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while NUS trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NUS's competition here
IPAR vs EWCZ Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EWCZ's competition here
IPAR vs PTNM Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PTNM's competition here
IPAR vs ACU Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while ACU trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ACU's competition here
IPAR vs SKIN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while SKIN trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SKIN's competition here
IPAR vs SLSN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while SLSN trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SLSN's competition here
IPAR vs GROV Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while GROV trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV's competition here
IPAR vs AXIL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while AXIL trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check AXIL's competition here
IPAR vs UG Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while UG trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UG's competition here
IPAR vs DSY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while DSY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSY's competition here
IPAR vs PHH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PHH's competition here
IPAR vs MTEX Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while MTEX trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check MTEX's competition here
IPAR vs BRSH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSH's competition here
IPAR vs RAY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while RAY trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RAY's competition here
IPAR vs TANH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while TANH trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TANH's competition here
IPAR vs DSYWW Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSYWW's competition here
IPAR vs TKLF Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 893.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while TKLF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TKLF's competition here
IPAR vs NXTS Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while NXTS trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NXTS's competition here
IPAR vs BRSHW Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSHW's competition here
IPAR vs RDEN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RDEN's competition here
IPAR vs SUMR Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SUMR's competition here
IPAR vs REV Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check REV's competition here
IPAR vs GROV-WT Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $91.69, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV-WT's competition here