Newell Brands Inc.
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWL | $4.25 | +2.54% | 1.8B | -6.22 | -$0.68 | +6.66% |
| PG | $148.45 | +1.88% | 346B | 21.94 | $6.75 | +2.88% |
| UL | $57.69 | +0.30% | 127B | 19.38 | $3.00 | +3.94% |
| CL | $84.10 | +0.45% | 67.9B | 32.18 | $2.63 | +2.48% |
| KVUE | $17.46 | -0.20% | 33.6B | 22.99 | $0.76 | +4.75% |
| KMB | $97.80 | -0.14% | 32.5B | 20.13 | $4.86 | +5.19% |
| EL | $77.12 | +0.94% | 28.1B | -152.61 | -$0.51 | +1.81% |
| CHD | $95.46 | +0.93% | 22.5B | 31.47 | $3.02 | +1.25% |
| SGI | $79.82 | +0.47% | 16.6B | 42.97 | $1.84 | +0.79% |
| CLX | $96.86 | -0.82% | 11.9B | 16.15 | $6.11 | +5.04% |
Stock Comparison
NWL vs PG Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 346B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while PG trades at $148.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PG's competition here
NWL vs UL Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while UL trades at $57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UL's competition here
NWL vs CL Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while CL trades at $84.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CL's competition here
NWL vs KVUE Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while KVUE trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KVUE's competition here
NWL vs KMB Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while KMB trades at $97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KMB's competition here
NWL vs EL Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while EL trades at $77.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -152.61. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EL's competition here
NWL vs CHD Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while CHD trades at $95.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CHD's competition here
NWL vs SGI Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while SGI trades at $79.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 42.97. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SGI's competition here
NWL vs CLX Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while CLX trades at $96.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CLX's competition here
NWL vs NTCO Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NTCO's competition here
NWL vs ELF Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while ELF trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ELF's competition here
NWL vs IPAR Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while IPAR trades at $91.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check IPAR's competition here
NWL vs COTY Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while COTY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check COTY's competition here
NWL vs SPB Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while SPB trades at $84.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SPB's competition here
NWL vs EPC Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while EPC trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 212.91. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EPC's competition here
NWL vs HELE Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 545M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while HELE trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check HELE's competition here
NWL vs NUS Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 362.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while NUS trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NUS's competition here
NWL vs EWCZ Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 318.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EWCZ's competition here
NWL vs PTNM Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PTNM's competition here
NWL vs ACU Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while ACU trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ACU's competition here
NWL vs SKIN Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while SKIN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SKIN's competition here
NWL vs SLSN Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while SLSN trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SLSN's competition here
NWL vs AXIL Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while AXIL trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 57.25. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check AXIL's competition here
NWL vs GROV Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while GROV trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV's competition here
NWL vs UG Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while UG trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UG's competition here
NWL vs DSY Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while DSY trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSY's competition here
NWL vs PHH Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PHH's competition here
NWL vs MTEX Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while MTEX trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check MTEX's competition here
NWL vs BRSH Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSH's competition here
NWL vs RAY Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while RAY trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RAY's competition here
NWL vs TANH Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while TANH trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TANH's competition here
NWL vs TKLF Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 946K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while TKLF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TKLF's competition here
NWL vs DSYWW Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 831.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSYWW's competition here
NWL vs NXTS Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 283K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while NXTS trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NXTS's competition here
NWL vs BRSHW Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSHW's competition here
NWL vs REV Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check REV's competition here
NWL vs SUMR Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SUMR's competition here
NWL vs RDEN Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RDEN's competition here
NWL vs GROV-WT Comparison April 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.25, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV-WT's competition here