Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWL | $6.06 | +4.04% | 2.6B | 11.22 | $0.54 | +4.56% |
| PG | $144.32 | -3.16% | 345.6B | 21.38 | $6.94 | +2.88% |
| UL | $60.05 | -0.83% | 131.9B | 20.13 | $3.04 | +3.72% |
| CL | $91.03 | -1.13% | 73.9B | 24.63 | $3.75 | +2.27% |
| KVUE | $19.03 | -0.52% | 36.7B | 16.46 | $1.16 | +4.34% |
| KMB | $109.04 | -0.30% | 36.5B | 14.52 | $7.57 | +4.62% |
| EL | $77.81 | -3.39% | 28.7B | 35.92 | $2.21 | +1.77% |
| CHD | $96.28 | -3.31% | 23.2B | 27.49 | $3.56 | +1.24% |
| SGI | $77.40 | -0.69% | 16.4B | 28.03 | $2.79 | +0.82% |
| CLX | $94.49 | -3.13% | 11.7B | 14.39 | $6.75 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
NWL vs PG Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 345.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while PG trades at $144.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PG's competition here
NWL vs UL Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while UL trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UL's competition here
NWL vs CL Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while CL trades at $91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CL's competition here
NWL vs KVUE Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while KVUE trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KVUE's competition here
NWL vs KMB Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while KMB trades at $109.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KMB's competition here
NWL vs EL Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while EL trades at $77.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EL's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EL's competition here
NWL vs CHD Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while CHD trades at $96.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CHD's competition here
NWL vs SGI Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while SGI trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SGI's competition here
NWL vs CLX Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while CLX trades at $94.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CLX's competition here
NWL vs REYN Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while REYN trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check REYN's competition here
NWL vs NTCO Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NTCO's competition here
NWL vs ELF Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while ELF trades at $71.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ELF's competition here
NWL vs IPAR Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while IPAR trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check IPAR's competition here
NWL vs SPB Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while SPB trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SPB's competition here
NWL vs COTY Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while COTY trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check COTY's competition here
NWL vs EPC Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while EPC trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EPC's competition here
NWL vs HELE Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 668M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while HELE trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check HELE's competition here
NWL vs EWCZ Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EWCZ's competition here
NWL vs NUS Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 255.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while NUS trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NUS's competition here
NWL vs PTNM Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PTNM's competition here
NWL vs ACU Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while ACU trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ACU's competition here
NWL vs SKIN Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while SKIN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SKIN's competition here
NWL vs SLSN Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while SLSN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 64.80. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SLSN's competition here
NWL vs GROV Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while GROV trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV's competition here
NWL vs AXIL Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while AXIL trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 53.63. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check AXIL's competition here
NWL vs UG Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while UG trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UG's competition here
NWL vs DSY Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while DSY trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSY's competition here
NWL vs PHH Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PHH's competition here
NWL vs MTEX Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while MTEX trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check MTEX's competition here
NWL vs BRSH Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSH's competition here
NWL vs TANH Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while TANH trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TANH's competition here
NWL vs TKLF Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 846.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while TKLF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TKLF's competition here
NWL vs BRSHW Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSHW's competition here
NWL vs RDEN Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RDEN's competition here
NWL vs GROV-WT Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV-WT's competition here
NWL vs REV Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check REV's competition here
NWL vs SUMR Comparison July 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $6.06, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SUMR's competition here