Unilever PLC
Unilever PLC (UL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL | $57.30 | +1.88% | 124.9B | 18.85 | $3.04 | +3.97% |
| PG | $142.39 | +0.58% | 331.5B | 20.81 | $6.84 | +2.99% |
| CL | $89.92 | +2.03% | 72B | 34.85 | $2.58 | +2.32% |
| KVUE | $17.18 | +0.41% | 33B | 20.46 | $0.84 | +4.84% |
| KMB | $96.54 | +0.66% | 32B | 18.67 | $5.17 | +5.25% |
| EL | $80.01 | -0.34% | 28.9B | -114.27 | -$0.70 | +1.74% |
| CHD | $96.78 | +2.90% | 22.9B | 31.85 | $3.04 | +1.25% |
| SGI | $62.25 | -0.69% | 13.1B | 24.90 | $2.50 | +0.99% |
| CLX | $92.82 | +2.62% | 11.2B | 15.09 | $6.15 | +5.34% |
| NTCO | $6.60 | +0.38% | 4.6B | -11.37 | -$0.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UL vs PG Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 331.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while PG trades at $142.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PG's competition here
UL vs CL Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while CL trades at $89.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CL's competition here
UL vs KVUE Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while KVUE trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check KVUE's competition here
UL vs KMB Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while KMB trades at $96.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check KMB's competition here
UL vs EL Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while EL trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -114.27. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EL's competition here
UL vs CHD Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while CHD trades at $96.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CHD's competition here
UL vs SGI Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while SGI trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SGI's competition here
UL vs CLX Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while CLX trades at $92.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CLX's competition here
UL vs NTCO Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NTCO's competition here
UL vs ELF Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while ELF trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check ELF's competition here
UL vs IPAR Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while IPAR trades at $87.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check IPAR's competition here
UL vs SPB Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while SPB trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SPB's competition here
UL vs COTY Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while COTY trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check COTY's competition here
UL vs NWL Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while NWL trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NWL's competition here
UL vs EPC Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 743.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while EPC trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is -70.17. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EPC's competition here
UL vs HELE Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 557M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while HELE trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check HELE's competition here
UL vs EWCZ Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EWCZ's competition here
UL vs NUS Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while NUS trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NUS's competition here
UL vs PTNM Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PTNM's competition here
UL vs ACU Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while ACU trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check ACU's competition here
UL vs SLSN Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while SLSN trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 123.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SLSN's competition here
UL vs SKIN Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while SKIN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SKIN's competition here
UL vs GROV Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while GROV trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check GROV's competition here
UL vs AXIL Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while AXIL trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check AXIL's competition here
UL vs UG Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while UG trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check UG's competition here
UL vs RAY Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while RAY trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check RAY's competition here
UL vs PHH Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PHH's competition here
UL vs DSY Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while DSY trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check DSY's competition here
UL vs BRSH Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check BRSH's competition here
UL vs MTEX Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while MTEX trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check MTEX's competition here
UL vs TANH Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while TANH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check TANH's competition here
UL vs TKLF Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 871.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while TKLF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check TKLF's competition here
UL vs DSYWW Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 773.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check DSYWW's competition here
UL vs BRSHW Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check BRSHW's competition here
UL vs SUMR Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SUMR's competition here
UL vs REV Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check REV's competition here
UL vs GROV-WT Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check GROV-WT's competition here
UL vs RDEN Comparison May 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 124.9B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $57.30, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check RDEN's competition here