PepsiCo, Inc.
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PEP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | $150.37 | +0.88% | 205.5B | 23.60 | $6.37 | +3.80% |
| KO | $81.92 | +0.89% | 352.7B | 25.78 | $3.18 | +2.51% |
| MNST | $86.35 | -2.47% | 84.5B | 41.71 | $2.07 | N/A |
| CCEP | $91.86 | -0.60% | 41.2B | 18.41 | $4.99 | +2.61% |
| KDP | $28.85 | -1.97% | 39.3B | 21.37 | $1.35 | +3.16% |
| KOF | $105.50 | -0.31% | 22.2B | -234.40 | -$0.45 | +3.87% |
| COKE | $173.36 | +0.66% | 13.6B | 23.78 | $7.29 | +0.58% |
| PRMB | $22.48 | -4.34% | 8.2B | 118.32 | $0.19 | +1.87% |
| CELH | $29.13 | -0.68% | 7.4B | 67.74 | $0.43 | N/A |
| AKO-B | $27.70 | -1.11% | 4.4B | 14.06 | $1.97 | +3.71% |
Stock Comparison
PEP vs KO Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 352.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while KO trades at $81.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KO's competition here
PEP vs MNST Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while MNST trades at $86.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check MNST's competition here
PEP vs CCEP Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while CCEP trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CCEP's competition here
PEP vs KDP Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while KDP trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KDP's competition here
PEP vs KOF Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while KOF trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -234.40. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KOF's competition here
PEP vs COKE Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while COKE trades at $173.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check COKE's competition here
PEP vs PRMB Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while PRMB trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 118.32. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check PRMB's competition here
PEP vs CELH Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while CELH trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 67.74. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CELH's competition here
PEP vs AKO-B Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while AKO-B trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check AKO-B's competition here
PEP vs COCO Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while COCO trades at $76.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 55.40. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check COCO's competition here
PEP vs PRMW Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check PRMW's competition here
PEP vs AKO-A Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while AKO-A trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check AKO-A's competition here
PEP vs FIZZ Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while FIZZ trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check FIZZ's competition here
PEP vs CHA Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while CHA trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CHA's competition here
PEP vs SUJA Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while SUJA trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -17.41. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check SUJA's competition here
PEP vs OTLY Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while OTLY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check OTLY's competition here
PEP vs BUDA Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while BUDA trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BUDA's competition here
PEP vs ZVIA Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while ZVIA trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check ZVIA's competition here
PEP vs SHOT Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check SHOT's competition here
PEP vs BRFH Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while BRFH trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BRFH's competition here
PEP vs REED Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while REED trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check REED's competition here
PEP vs BNKK Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while BNKK trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BNKK's competition here
PEP vs BNKKW Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BNKKW's competition here
PEP vs GMCR Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check GMCR's competition here
PEP vs NBEV Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check NBEV's competition here
PEP vs CRVP Comparison May 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 205.5B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $150.37, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 23.60, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CRVP's competition here