Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MNST's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MNST and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $46.80 | -0.01% | 92.2B | 42.00 | $1.12 | N/A |
| KO | $92.75 | -0.72% | 402.2B | 29.87 | $3.13 | +2.26% |
| PEP | $135.00 | +1.07% | 182.6B | 16.03 | $8.36 | +4.32% |
| CCEP | $111.21 | -0.59% | 50.3B | 22.86 | $4.96 | +2.01% |
| KDP | $34.60 | +0.39% | 47.1B | 16.49 | $2.10 | +2.67% |
| FMX | $128.35 | +1.12% | 44B | 41.14 | $3.14 | +5.85% |
| KOF | $117.74 | -1.85% | 24.8B | 18.63 | $6.34 | +3.63% |
| COKE | $212.00 | +0.99% | 14.2B | 24.25 | $8.79 | +0.47% |
| CELH | $28.68 | -3.48% | 7.6B | 20.66 | $1.45 | N/A |
| PRMB | $19.95 | +0.78% | 7.2B | 15.75 | $1.27 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO)
MNST vs KO Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 402.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while KO trades at $92.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KO's competition here
PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ: PEP)
MNST vs PEP Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while PEP trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PEP's competition here
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (NASDAQ: CCEP)
MNST vs CCEP Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while CCEP trades at $111.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CCEP's competition here
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (NASDAQ: KDP)
MNST vs KDP Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while KDP trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KDP's competition here
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: FMX)
MNST vs FMX Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, FMX has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while FMX trades at $128.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FMX's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FMX's competition here
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: KOF)
MNST vs KOF Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while KOF trades at $117.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KOF's competition here
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (NASDAQ: COKE)
MNST vs COKE Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while COKE trades at $212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COKE's competition here
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CELH)
MNST vs CELH Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while CELH trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CELH's competition here
Primo Brands Corporation (NYSE: PRMB)
MNST vs PRMB Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while PRMB trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMB's competition here
Primo Water Corporation (NYSE: PRMW)
MNST vs PRMW Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMW's competition here
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: COCO)
MNST vs COCO Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while COCO trades at $62.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COCO's competition here
National Beverage Corp. (NASDAQ: FIZZ)
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while FIZZ trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FIZZ's competition here
Embotelladora Andina S.A. (NYSE: AKO-B)
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while AKO-B trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-B's competition here
Embotelladora Andina S.A. (NYSE: AKO-A)
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while AKO-A trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-A's competition here
Suja Life, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUJA)
MNST vs SUJA Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while SUJA trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUJA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SUJA's competition here
Buda Juice Inc. (AMEX: BUDA)
MNST vs BUDA Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while BUDA trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 70.88. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BUDA's competition here
Zevia PBC (NYSE: ZVIA)
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while ZVIA trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check ZVIA's competition here
Air Water Ventures Limited (NASDAQ: WATR)
MNST vs WATR Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, WATR has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while WATR trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WATR's P/E ratio is 131.03. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WATR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to WATR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check WATR's competition here
Barfresh Food Group Inc. (NASDAQ: BRFH)
MNST vs BRFH Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while BRFH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BRFH's competition here
Bonk, Inc. (NASDAQ: BNKK)
MNST vs BNKK Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while BNKK trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKK's competition here
Reed's, Inc. (AMEX: REED)
MNST vs REED Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while REED trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of -5.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check REED's competition here
Bonk, Inc. Warrant (NASDAQ: BNKKW)
MNST vs BNKKW Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKKW's competition here
NewAge, Inc. (NASDAQ: NBEV)
MNST vs NBEV Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check NBEV's competition here
Crystal Rock Holdings Inc. Class A (AMEX: CRVP)
MNST vs CRVP Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CRVP's competition here
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (NASDAQ: GMCR)
MNST vs GMCR Comparison October 2026
Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 92.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $46.80 on the NASDAQ, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check GMCR's competition here