Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $90.15 | +1.90% | 88.2B | 43.55 | $2.07 | N/A |
| KO | $81.34 | +2.26% | 350B | 25.58 | $3.18 | +2.54% |
| PEP | $142.78 | +1.49% | 195.2B | 22.41 | $6.37 | +4.04% |
| CCEP | $96.87 | +1.70% | 42.9B | 19.73 | $4.91 | +2.48% |
| KDP | $31.48 | +2.37% | 42.8B | 23.32 | $1.35 | +2.94% |
| KOF | $104.35 | -0.38% | 21.9B | -231.44 | -$0.45 | +3.94% |
| COKE | $185.09 | +3.51% | 14.5B | 25.39 | $7.29 | +0.54% |
| PRMB | $23.38 | +0.82% | 8.5B | 123.16 | $0.19 | +1.89% |
| CELH | $28.19 | +0.68% | 7.2B | 65.56 | $0.43 | N/A |
| AKO-B | $26.61 | +0.15% | 4.3B | 13.85 | $1.96 | +3.71% |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while KO trades at $81.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KO's competition here
MNST vs PEP Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 195.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while PEP trades at $142.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PEP's competition here
MNST vs CCEP Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while CCEP trades at $96.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CCEP's competition here
MNST vs KDP Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while KDP trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KDP's competition here
MNST vs KOF Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while KOF trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -231.44. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KOF's competition here
MNST vs COKE Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while COKE trades at $185.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COKE's competition here
MNST vs PRMB Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while PRMB trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 123.16. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMB's competition here
MNST vs CELH Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while CELH trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CELH's competition here
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while AKO-B trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-B's competition here
MNST vs COCO Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while COCO trades at $74.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 53.78. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COCO's competition here
MNST vs PRMW Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMW's competition here
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while FIZZ trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FIZZ's competition here
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while AKO-A trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-A's competition here
MNST vs CHA Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while CHA trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CHA's competition here
MNST vs SUJA Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 369.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while SUJA trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SUJA's competition here
MNST vs OTLY Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while OTLY trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check OTLY's competition here
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while ZVIA trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check ZVIA's competition here
MNST vs BUDA Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while BUDA trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BUDA's competition here
MNST vs SHOT Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SHOT's competition here
MNST vs BRFH Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while BRFH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BRFH's competition here
MNST vs REED Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while REED trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check REED's competition here
MNST vs BNKK Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while BNKK trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKK's competition here
MNST vs BNKKW Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKKW's competition here
MNST vs GMCR Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check GMCR's competition here
MNST vs CRVP Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CRVP's competition here
MNST vs NBEV Comparison June 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 88.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $90.15, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 43.55, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check NBEV's competition here