Monster Beverage Corporation
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $87.09 | +1.48% | 85.2B | 42.07 | $2.07 | N/A |
| KO | $80.82 | +0.46% | 347.7B | 25.42 | $3.18 | +2.54% |
| PEP | $149.12 | +0.30% | 203.8B | 23.41 | $6.37 | +3.82% |
| CCEP | $89.36 | -1.62% | 40B | 17.80 | $5.02 | +2.69% |
| KDP | $28.93 | -0.58% | 39.4B | 21.43 | $1.35 | +3.17% |
| KOF | $104.35 | -0.51% | 21.9B | -237.02 | -$0.44 | +3.93% |
| COKE | $170.27 | +4.19% | 13.4B | 23.32 | $7.30 | +0.60% |
| PRMB | $23.18 | -0.39% | 8.4B | 121.95 | $0.19 | +1.81% |
| CELH | $30.16 | +3.96% | 7.7B | 70.14 | $0.43 | N/A |
| COCO | $78.44 | +2.62% | 4.5B | 56.84 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 347.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while KO trades at $80.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KO's competition here
MNST vs PEP Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 203.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while PEP trades at $149.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PEP's competition here
MNST vs CCEP Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while CCEP trades at $89.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CCEP's competition here
MNST vs KDP Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while KDP trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KDP's competition here
MNST vs KOF Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while KOF trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -237.02. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KOF's competition here
MNST vs COKE Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while COKE trades at $170.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COKE's competition here
MNST vs PRMB Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while PRMB trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 121.95. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMB's competition here
MNST vs CELH Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while CELH trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 70.14. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CELH's competition here
MNST vs COCO Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while COCO trades at $78.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COCO's competition here
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while AKO-B trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-B's competition here
MNST vs PRMW Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMW's competition here
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while AKO-A trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-A's competition here
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while FIZZ trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FIZZ's competition here
MNST vs CHA Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while CHA trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CHA's competition here
MNST vs SUJA Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while SUJA trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SUJA's competition here
MNST vs OTLY Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while OTLY trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check OTLY's competition here
MNST vs BUDA Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while BUDA trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BUDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BUDA's competition here
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while ZVIA trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check ZVIA's competition here
MNST vs SHOT Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SHOT's competition here
MNST vs BRFH Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while BRFH trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BRFH's competition here
MNST vs REED Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while REED trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check REED's competition here
MNST vs BNKK Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while BNKK trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKK's competition here
MNST vs BNKKW Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BNKKW's competition here
MNST vs GMCR Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check GMCR's competition here
MNST vs NBEV Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check NBEV's competition here
MNST vs CRVP Comparison May 2026
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 85.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $87.09, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 42.07, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CRVP's competition here