National Beverage Corp.
National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FIZZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | $34.20 | +1.00% | 3.2B | 17.10 | $2.00 | N/A |
| KO | $76.63 | +0.46% | 329.8B | 25.21 | $3.04 | +2.69% |
| PEP | $155.44 | -0.17% | 212.5B | 24.40 | $6.37 | +3.67% |
| MNST | $78.23 | +0.86% | 76.5B | 40.32 | $1.94 | N/A |
| CCEP | $98.06 | +0.75% | 43.9B | 19.50 | $5.03 | +2.39% |
| KDP | $29.22 | +2.42% | 39.7B | 21.64 | $1.35 | +3.16% |
| KOF | $102.28 | +0.43% | 21.5B | 124.85 | $0.82 | +3.86% |
| COKE | $195.59 | +1.52% | 16.4B | 28.72 | $6.81 | +0.51% |
| CELH | $34.59 | +1.95% | 8.9B | 138.36 | $0.25 | N/A |
| PRMB | $20.40 | +0.94% | 7.4B | 97.17 | $0.21 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
FIZZ vs KO Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 329.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while KO trades at $76.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check KO's competition here
FIZZ vs PEP Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while PEP trades at $155.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check PEP's competition here
FIZZ vs MNST Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while MNST trades at $78.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check MNST's competition here
FIZZ vs CCEP Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while CCEP trades at $98.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check CCEP's competition here
FIZZ vs KDP Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while KDP trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check KDP's competition here
FIZZ vs KOF Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while KOF trades at $102.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 124.85. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check KOF's competition here
FIZZ vs COKE Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while COKE trades at $195.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check COKE's competition here
FIZZ vs CELH Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while CELH trades at $34.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 138.36. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check CELH's competition here
FIZZ vs PRMB Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while PRMB trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 97.17. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check PRMB's competition here
FIZZ vs AKO-B Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while AKO-B trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check AKO-B's competition here
FIZZ vs AKO-A Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while AKO-A trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check AKO-A's competition here
FIZZ vs PRMW Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check PRMW's competition here
FIZZ vs COCO Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while COCO trades at $50.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check COCO's competition here
FIZZ vs CHA Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while CHA trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check CHA's competition here
FIZZ vs OTLY Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while OTLY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check OTLY's competition here
FIZZ vs BUDA Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while BUDA trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BUDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check BUDA's competition here
FIZZ vs ZVIA Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while ZVIA trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check ZVIA's competition here
FIZZ vs SHOT Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check SHOT's competition here
FIZZ vs BRFH Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while BRFH trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check BRFH's competition here
FIZZ vs REED Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while REED trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REED's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check REED's competition here
FIZZ vs BNKK Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while BNKK trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check BNKK's competition here
FIZZ vs BNKKW Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check BNKKW's competition here
FIZZ vs GMCR Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check GMCR's competition here
FIZZ vs NBEV Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check NBEV's competition here
FIZZ vs CRVP Comparison April 2026
FIZZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIZZ stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FIZZ is priced at $34.20, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIZZ currently has a P/E ratio of 17.10, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIZZ's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIZZ is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIZZ.Check CRVP's competition here