Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CELH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | $33.16 | +4.05% | 8.5B | 21.26 | $1.56 | N/A |
| KO | $84.14 | +3.51% | 362B | 26.88 | $3.13 | +2.47% |
| PEP | $144.22 | +2.17% | 197.1B | 17.42 | $8.28 | +3.99% |
| MNST | $97.60 | +0.26% | 95.5B | 44.98 | $2.17 | N/A |
| CCEP | $106.61 | +0.48% | 47.3B | 22.07 | $4.83 | +2.26% |
| KDP | $33.30 | -0.21% | 45.3B | 16.49 | $2.02 | +2.76% |
| KOF | $107.38 | +1.49% | 22.6B | 18.08 | $5.94 | +3.82% |
| COKE | $195.63 | +0.92% | 15.4B | 23.86 | $8.20 | +0.51% |
| PRMB | $25.02 | +2.04% | 9.1B | 19.86 | $1.26 | +1.76% |
| AKO-B | $29.49 | -3.09% | 4.7B | 13.49 | $2.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CELH vs KO Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 362B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while KO trades at $84.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KO's competition here
CELH vs PEP Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while PEP trades at $144.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PEP's competition here
CELH vs MNST Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while MNST trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check MNST's competition here
CELH vs CCEP Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while CCEP trades at $106.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CCEP's competition here
CELH vs KDP Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while KDP trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KDP's competition here
CELH vs KOF Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while KOF trades at $107.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KOF's competition here
CELH vs COKE Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while COKE trades at $195.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COKE's competition here
CELH vs PRMB Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while PRMB trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMB's competition here
CELH vs AKO-B Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while AKO-B trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-B's competition here
CELH vs PRMW Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMW's competition here
CELH vs COCO Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while COCO trades at $66.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 48.29. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COCO's competition here
CELH vs AKO-A Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while AKO-A trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-A's competition here
CELH vs FIZZ Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while FIZZ trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check FIZZ's competition here
CELH vs CHA Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while CHA trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CHA's competition here
CELH vs OTLY Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while OTLY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check OTLY's competition here
CELH vs SUJA Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while SUJA trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUJA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SUJA's competition here
CELH vs ZVIA Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while ZVIA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check ZVIA's competition here
CELH vs BUDA Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while BUDA trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 86.60. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BUDA's competition here
CELH vs SHOT Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SHOT's competition here
CELH vs BRFH Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while BRFH trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BRFH's competition here
CELH vs REED Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while REED trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check REED's competition here
CELH vs BNKK Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while BNKK trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKK's competition here
CELH vs BNKKW Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKKW's competition here
CELH vs NBEV Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check NBEV's competition here
CELH vs CRVP Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CRVP's competition here
CELH vs GMCR Comparison July 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 8.5B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $33.16, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 21.26, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check GMCR's competition here