Celsius Holdings, Inc.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CELH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | $29.33 | -2.75% | 7.5B | 68.21 | $0.43 | N/A |
| KO | $81.20 | +0.47% | 349.4B | 25.54 | $3.18 | +2.53% |
| PEP | $149.06 | -0.04% | 203.7B | 23.40 | $6.37 | +3.83% |
| MNST | $88.54 | +1.66% | 86.6B | 42.77 | $2.07 | N/A |
| CCEP | $92.41 | +3.41% | 41.4B | 18.52 | $4.99 | +2.61% |
| KDP | $29.43 | +1.73% | 40B | 21.80 | $1.35 | +3.13% |
| KOF | $105.83 | +1.42% | 22.2B | -235.24 | -$0.45 | +3.88% |
| COKE | $172.23 | +1.15% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $7.29 | +0.57% |
| PRMB | $23.50 | +1.38% | 8.5B | 123.63 | $0.19 | +1.80% |
| COCO | $79.23 | +1.01% | 4.5B | 57.38 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CELH vs KO Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 349.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while KO trades at $81.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KO's competition here
CELH vs PEP Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while PEP trades at $149.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PEP's competition here
CELH vs MNST Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while MNST trades at $88.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check MNST's competition here
CELH vs CCEP Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while CCEP trades at $92.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CCEP's competition here
CELH vs KDP Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while KDP trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KDP's competition here
CELH vs KOF Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while KOF trades at $105.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -235.24. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KOF's competition here
CELH vs COKE Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while COKE trades at $172.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COKE's competition here
CELH vs PRMB Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while PRMB trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 123.63. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMB's competition here
CELH vs COCO Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while COCO trades at $79.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 57.38. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COCO's competition here
CELH vs AKO-B Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while AKO-B trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-B's competition here
CELH vs PRMW Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMW's competition here
CELH vs AKO-A Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while AKO-A trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-A's competition here
CELH vs FIZZ Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while FIZZ trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check FIZZ's competition here
CELH vs CHA Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while CHA trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CHA's competition here
CELH vs SUJA Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 369.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while SUJA trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SUJA's competition here
CELH vs OTLY Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while OTLY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check OTLY's competition here
CELH vs BUDA Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while BUDA trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BUDA's competition here
CELH vs ZVIA Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while ZVIA trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check ZVIA's competition here
CELH vs SHOT Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SHOT's competition here
CELH vs BRFH Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while BRFH trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BRFH's competition here
CELH vs REED Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while REED trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check REED's competition here
CELH vs BNKK Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while BNKK trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKK's competition here
CELH vs BNKKW Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKKW's competition here
CELH vs GMCR Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check GMCR's competition here
CELH vs NBEV Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check NBEV's competition here
CELH vs CRVP Comparison May 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $29.33, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 68.21, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CRVP's competition here