Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, BUD has a market cap of 161.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while BUD trades at $83.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas BUD's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to BUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check BUD's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ABEV has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while ABEV trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas ABEV's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABEV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to ABEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check ABEV's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, TAP-A has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while TAP-A trades at $41.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas TAP-A's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAP-A's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to TAP-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check TAP-A's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, TAP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while TAP trades at $42.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas TAP's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to TAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check TAP's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, CCU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while CCU trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CCU's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to CCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check CCU's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, SAM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while SAM trades at $187.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas SAM's P/E ratio is -29.46. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SAM's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, CASK has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while CASK trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas CASK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASK's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to CASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check CASK's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, YHC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while YHC trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas YHC's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YHC's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to YHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check YHC's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, IPST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while IPST trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas IPST's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPST's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to IPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check IPST's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, SBEV has a market cap of 579.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while SBEV trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas SBEV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBEV's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SBEV's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, SBEV-WT has a market cap of 41.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while SBEV-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas SBEV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBEV-WT's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is less volatile compared to SBEV-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check SBEV-WT's competition here

FMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMX stands at 24.5B. In comparison, LQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMX is priced at $121.05, while LQ trades at $43.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.69, whereas LQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LQ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMX is more volatile compared to LQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMX.Check LQ's competition here