Pear Therapeutics, Inc.
Pear Therapeutics, Inc. PEARW Peers
See (PEARW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEARW | $0.01 | +0.00% | 4.1M | -0.00 | -$10.10 | N/A |
| VEEV | $283.41 | +0.79% | 46.3B | 60.27 | $4.70 | N/A |
| GEHC | $74.38 | -0.64% | 34.1B | 15.63 | $4.76 | +0.17% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.17% |
| DOCS | $61.09 | +1.13% | 11.5B | 55.05 | $1.11 | N/A |
| HQY | $104.88 | +0.02% | 9.1B | 76.55 | $1.37 | N/A |
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| RCM | $14.31 | N/A | 6B | -102.21 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BTSG | $23.54 | +1.99% | 4.1B | 87.19 | $0.27 | N/A |
| BTSGU | $81.74 | +1.68% | 4.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PEARW vs VEEV Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while VEEV trades at $283.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 60.27. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs GEHC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while GEHC trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs GEHCV Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs DOCS Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while DOCS trades at $61.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 55.05. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs HQY Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while HQY trades at $104.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 76.55. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to HQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SGFY Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SGFY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs RCM Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RCM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BTSG Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BTSG trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 87.19. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BTSGU Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BTSGU trades at $81.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ONEM Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs PRVA Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while PRVA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 183.33. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs WGS Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while WGS trades at $94.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is -65.54. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to WGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs PGNY Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while PGNY trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CERT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CERT trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is -569.00. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CERT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs PINC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PINC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while PINC trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PINC's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PINC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to PINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs GDRX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while GDRX trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs PHR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while PHR trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to PHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs NXGN Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SDGR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SDGR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SDGR trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SDGR's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SDGR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SDGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs TDOC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while TDOC trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs TXG Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while TXG trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to TXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs OMCL Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while OMCL trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 63.87. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs AGTI Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs EVH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while EVH trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to EVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs HSTM Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 841M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while HSTM trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CTEV Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 712.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CTEV trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CTEV's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs NUTX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NUTX has a market cap of 682.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while NUTX trades at $122.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NUTX's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NUTX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to NUTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MPLN-WT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ACCD Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SHCR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs DH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while DH trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DH's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DH's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to DH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SLGC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SLGCW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs NRC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 379.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while NRC trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to NRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MPLN Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MPLN's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SPOK Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SPOK trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs TBRG Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 348.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while TBRG trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TBRG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SLP Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SLP trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SLP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SY Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SY trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs TRHC Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs HCAT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while HCAT trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs OPRX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 252.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while OPRX trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is -16.24. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OPRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SMFR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SMFR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SOPH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SOPH trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CPSI Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CPSI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs EUDA Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while EUDA trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs AMWL Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while AMWL trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs AUGX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CCLDO Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CCLDO trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CCLD Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CCLD trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs FORA Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while FORA trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to FORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CCLDP Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BEAT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BEAT has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BEAT trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BEAT's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BEAT's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BEATW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BEATW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SNCE Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs AKLI Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SHLT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SHCRW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs STRM Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while STRM trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to STRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs RNLX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RNLX's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs LIFW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while LIFW trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LIFW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs VSEEW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while VSEEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs VSEE Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while VSEE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MGRX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MGRX trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ONMD Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ONMD trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BFRGW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BFRGW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BFRG Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BFRG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs BBLN Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs INOV Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, INOV has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while INOV trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INOV's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to INOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to INOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SCNX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SCNX trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SCNX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MSPR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MSPR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MSPR trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MSPR's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to MSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ETAO Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs HCTI Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while HCTI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -23.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs HLTH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ZCMD Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ZCMD trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs UPH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to UPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs EUDAW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while EUDAW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ACON Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ACON trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ACON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ACON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs PEAR Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs OTRK Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while OTRK trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs WGSWW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while WGSWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs FOXO Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FOXO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while FOXO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FOXO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FOXO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to FOXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CMAX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CMAX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CMAX's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs WORX Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while WORX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to WORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs LIFWZ Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs OTRKP Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, OTRKP has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while OTRKP trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTRKP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OTRKP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to OTRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ICCT Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ICCT has a market cap of 755.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ICCT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ICCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ICCT's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ICCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs KERNW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs KERN Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while KERN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KERN's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to KERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MSPRZ Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 116.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MSPRZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs LIFWW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CMAXW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs ACONW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while ACONW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to ACONW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MSPRW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MSPRW has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MSPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MSPRW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to MSPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs UTRS Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, UTRS has a market cap of 888. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while UTRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to UTRS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to UTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs NH Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while NH trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to NH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs CHNG Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while CHNG trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHNG's P/E ratio is -152.72. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CHNG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to CHNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs MSPRV Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MSPRV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while MSPRV trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSPRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MSPRV's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is less volatile compared to MSPRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.
PEARW vs SMFRW Comparison
PEARW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEARW stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SMFRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEARW is priced at $0.01, while SMFRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEARW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEARW's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SMFRW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PEARW is more volatile compared to SMFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEARW.