PacWest Bancorp

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HDB trades at $76.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PNC trades at $196.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB trades at $47.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PS trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PP trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ITUB trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PH trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PA trades at $834.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.61. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while MFG trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while LYG trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while IBN trades at $33.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC trades at $45.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -239.68. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while DB trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSBR trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANL trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANM trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while MTB trades at $202.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KB trades at $85.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BBD trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BBDO trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITB trades at $43.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PO trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCA trades at $2,088.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCO trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PI trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PR trades at $16.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANP trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBAN trades at $17.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCP trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PR trades at $19.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PQ trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PF trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SHG trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PC trades at $24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG trades at $47.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -97.16. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PI trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PK trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PL trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BAP trades at $227.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBP trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PE trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BCH trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPN trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBO trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PB trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PC trades at $25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WF trades at $50.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PH trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PE trades at $23.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CIB trades at $46.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSAC trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CUBI-PE trades at $339.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WBS trades at $58.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SSB trades at $96.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WAL trades at $85.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PNFP trades at $117.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PF trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WTFC trades at $131.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFR trades at $136.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CBSH trades at $64.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONB trades at $22.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CMA trades at $63.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while UMBF trades at $110.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PE trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ZION trades at $55.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WTFCM trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BPOP trades at $114.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SNV trades at $55.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONBPO trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONBPP trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PB trades at $73.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SNV-PD trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while GGAL trades at $51.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BOKF trades at $102.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CADE trades at $34.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HOMB trades at $29.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while OZK trades at $51.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FNB trades at $15.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while UBSI trades at $38.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLY trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FFIN trades at $37.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while COLB trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while GBCI trades at $47.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HWC trades at $61.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPO trades at $24.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HWCPZ trades at $23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while AUB trades at $33.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while AX trades at $83.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.

PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ABCB trades at $67.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.