PacWest Bancorp
PacWest Bancorp (PACW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PACW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACW | $7.54 | -2.71% | 904.5M | -0.63 | -$11.90 | N/A |
| HDB | $76.46 | -1.29% | 195.6B | 25.24 | $3.03 | +0.87% |
| IBN | $33.30 | -1.41% | 118.9B | 19.60 | $1.70 | +0.72% |
| PNC | $192.55 | -0.42% | 76.2B | 13.16 | $14.63 | +3.38% |
| MFG | $5.89 | -0.17% | 74B | 12.54 | $0.47 | +2.66% |
| USB-PP | $22.97 | +0.17% | 72B | 4.94 | $4.64 | +4.35% |
| USB-PA | $827.00 | +0.00% | 71.8B | 235.61 | $3.51 | +4.35% |
| USB-PH | $20.54 | -0.19% | 71.7B | 4.44 | $4.64 | +4.35% |
| USB-PS | $18.85 | +0.37% | 71.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.35% |
| USB | $45.88 | -0.46% | 71.5B | 10.98 | $4.18 | +4.35% |
Stock Comparison
PACW vs HDB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HDB trades at $76.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HDB's competition here
PACW vs IBN Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while IBN trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check IBN's competition here
PACW vs PNC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PNC trades at $192.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check PNC's competition here
PACW vs MFG Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while MFG trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check MFG's competition here
PACW vs USB-PP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PP trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PP's competition here
PACW vs USB-PA Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PA trades at $827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 235.61. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PA's competition here
PACW vs USB-PH Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PH trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PH's competition here
PACW vs USB-PS Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PS trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PS's competition here
PACW vs USB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB's competition here
PACW vs DB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while DB trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check DB's competition here
PACW vs LYG Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while LYG trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check LYG's competition here
PACW vs ITUB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ITUB trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ITUB's competition here
PACW vs TFC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC trades at $44.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check TFC's competition here
PACW vs HBANL Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANL trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HBANL's competition here
PACW vs BSBR Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSBR trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BSBR's competition here
PACW vs HBANM Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANM trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HBANM's competition here
PACW vs MTB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while MTB trades at $191.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check MTB's competition here
PACW vs KB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KB trades at $80.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KB's competition here
PACW vs FITB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITB trades at $42.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FITB's competition here
PACW vs TFC-PO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PO trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check TFC-PO's competition here
PACW vs BBD Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BBD trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BBD's competition here
PACW vs KEY-PL Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PL trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KEY-PL's competition here
PACW vs FCNCP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCP trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FCNCP's competition here
PACW vs TFC-PI Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PI trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check TFC-PI's competition here
PACW vs FCNCO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCO trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FCNCO's competition here
PACW vs BBDO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BBDO trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BBDO's competition here
PACW vs HBANP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBANP trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HBANP's competition here
PACW vs USB-PR Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PR trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PR's competition here
PACW vs TFC-PR Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while TFC-PR trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check TFC-PR's competition here
PACW vs FCNCA Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FCNCA trades at $2,017.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FCNCA's competition here
PACW vs HBAN Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HBAN trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HBAN's competition here
PACW vs SHG Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SHG trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check SHG's competition here
PACW vs USB-PQ Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while USB-PQ trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check USB-PQ's competition here
PACW vs RF-PC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check RF-PC's competition here
PACW vs RF-PF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PF trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check RF-PF's competition here
PACW vs RF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check RF's competition here
PACW vs CFG Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CFG's competition here
PACW vs KEY-PJ Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
PACW vs KEY-PI Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PI trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KEY-PI's competition here
PACW vs KEY-PK Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY-PK trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KEY-PK's competition here
PACW vs KEY Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while KEY trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -227.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check KEY's competition here
PACW vs BAP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BAP trades at $235.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BAP's competition here
PACW vs FITBI Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBI trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FITBI's competition here
PACW vs FITBP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBP trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FITBP's competition here
PACW vs RF-PE Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while RF-PE trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check RF-PE's competition here
PACW vs CFG-PD Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CFG-PD's competition here
PACW vs VLYPN Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPN trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check VLYPN's competition here
PACW vs BCH Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BCH trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BCH's competition here
PACW vs FITBO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FITBO trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FITBO's competition here
PACW vs WF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WF trades at $53.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check WF's competition here
PACW vs FHN-PC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PC trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN-PC's competition here
PACW vs FHN-PB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN-PB's competition here
PACW vs FHN-PE Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PE trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN-PE's competition here
PACW vs CFG-PH Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PH trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CFG-PH's competition here
PACW vs CIB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CIB trades at $43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CIB's competition here
PACW vs FHN Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN's competition here
PACW vs BSAC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSAC trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BSAC's competition here
PACW vs CUBI-PE Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CUBI-PE trades at $333.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
PACW vs WBS Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WBS trades at $58.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check WBS's competition here
PACW vs SSB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SSB trades at $95.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check SSB's competition here
PACW vs ONBPP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONBPP trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ONBPP's competition here
PACW vs ONBPO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONBPO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ONBPO's competition here
PACW vs FHN-PF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PF trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN-PF's competition here
PACW vs CMA Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CMA trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CMA's competition here
PACW vs FHN-PD Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FHN-PD's competition here
PACW vs WTFC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WTFC trades at $130.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check WTFC's competition here
PACW vs WAL Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while WAL trades at $79.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check WAL's competition here
PACW vs CFR Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFR trades at $134.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CFR's competition here
PACW vs CFG-PE Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CFG-PE trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CFG-PE's competition here
PACW vs UMBF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while UMBF trades at $110.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check UMBF's competition here
PACW vs GGAL Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while GGAL trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check GGAL's competition here
PACW vs CBSH Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CBSH trades at $61.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CBSH's competition here
PACW vs ZION Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ZION trades at $54.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ZION's competition here
PACW vs ONB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ONB trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ONB's competition here
PACW vs BPOP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BPOP trades at $114.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BPOP's competition here
PACW vs BSMX Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BSMX's competition here
PACW vs PNFP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PNFP trades at $90.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check PNFP's competition here
PACW vs SNV-PD Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SNV-PD trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check SNV-PD's competition here
PACW vs BOKF Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BOKF trades at $103.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BOKF's competition here
PACW vs SNV Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while SNV trades at $47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check SNV's competition here
PACW vs CADE Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while CADE trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check CADE's competition here
PACW vs PB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while PB trades at $66.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check PB's competition here
PACW vs OZK Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while OZK trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check OZK's competition here
PACW vs HOMB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HOMB trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HOMB's competition here
PACW vs FNB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FNB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FNB's competition here
PACW vs VLYPP Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPP trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check VLYPP's competition here
PACW vs VLYPO Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check VLYPO's competition here
PACW vs VLY Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while VLY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check VLY's competition here
PACW vs BXS Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check BXS's competition here
PACW vs HWCPZ Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HWCPZ trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HWCPZ's competition here
PACW vs HWC Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while HWC trades at $60.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check HWC's competition here
PACW vs GBCI Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while GBCI trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check GBCI's competition here
PACW vs UBSI Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while UBSI trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check UBSI's competition here
PACW vs FFIN Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FFIN trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FFIN's competition here
PACW vs COLB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while COLB trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check COLB's competition here
PACW vs NYCB-PA Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
PACW vs AX Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while AX trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check AX's competition here
PACW vs FLG Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while FLG trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check FLG's competition here
PACW vs ABCB Comparison July 2025
PACW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACW stands at 904.5M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACW is priced at $7.54, while ABCB trades at $68.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, PACW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACW is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACW.Check ABCB's competition here