Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. PAC Peers
See (PAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | $218.82 | -3.89% | 11.2B | 23.03 | $9.49 | +5.26% |
| DAL | $55.67 | -0.65% | 36.4B | 8.09 | $6.88 | +1.08% |
| UAL | $90.78 | -1.70% | 29.7B | 8.26 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $37.17 | +0.84% | 21.2B | 41.75 | $0.89 | +1.93% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| JOBY | $16.61 | -1.37% | 13.1B | -19.76 | -$0.84 | N/A |
| JOBY-WT | $6.26 | -3.54% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LTM | $41.45 | +0.78% | 12.5B | 11.66 | $3.55 | +1.53% |
| ASR | $301.51 | -2.26% | 9.3B | 12.55 | $24.06 | +8.11% |
| AAL | $12.50 | +1.46% | 8.2B | 12.51 | $1.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAC vs DAL Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while DAL trades at $55.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs UAL Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while UAL trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs LUV Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while LUV trades at $37.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs CEA Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs JOBY Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while JOBY trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs JOBY-WT Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while JOBY-WT trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs LTM Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while LTM trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ASR Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ASR trades at $301.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs AAL Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while AAL trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs RYAAY Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while RYAAY trades at $61.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ALK Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ALK trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs OMAB Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while OMAB trades at $107.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs SKYW Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while SKYW trades at $112.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs CPA Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while CPA trades at $109.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs GOL Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs PBI-PB Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while PBI-PB trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs CAAP Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while CAAP trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs AAWW Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs JBLU Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while JBLU trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ATSG Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs UP Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while UP trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ULCC Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 972.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ULCC trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ALGT Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 958M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ALGT trades at $52.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs HA Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs SNCY Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while SNCY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs VLRS Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 586.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while VLRS trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs BLDEW Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 359.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while BLDEW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs BLDE Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 358.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while BLDE trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -13.42. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ASLE Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ASLE trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -54.36. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs FLYX Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while FLYX trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs SRFM Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while SRFM trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs AZUL Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs MATH Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while MATH trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs FLYY Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while FLYY trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs SAVE Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs MESA Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while MESA trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs SOAR Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while SOAR trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs FLYX-WT Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ZNH Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.
PAC vs ASLEW Comparison
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $218.82, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.03, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.