New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (NYCB-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NYCB-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYCB-PA | $21.28 | -0.56% | 5B | 17.46 | $1.22 | +0.32% |
| USB-PA | $773.97 | -0.26% | 1.3T | 220.51 | $3.51 | +3.97% |
| HDB | $28.99 | +2.67% | 148.8B | 20.00 | $1.45 | +3.80% |
| IBN | $27.37 | +2.97% | 97.9B | 17.33 | $1.58 | +0.94% |
| MFG | $7.80 | +2.23% | 96.4B | 14.73 | $0.53 | +2.20% |
| ITUB | $8.20 | +2.82% | 90.4B | 10.65 | $0.77 | +6.75% |
| PNC | $200.75 | -0.19% | 80.9B | 12.09 | $16.59 | +3.32% |
| USB | $51.16 | +0.31% | 79.5B | 11.07 | $4.62 | +3.97% |
| LYG | $5.11 | +1.69% | 75.2B | 13.82 | $0.37 | +3.23% |
| USB-PP | $22.61 | -0.57% | 71B | 4.88 | $4.64 | +3.97% |
Stock Comparison
NYCB-PA vs USB-PA Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PA trades at $773.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 220.51. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check USB-PA's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HDB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HDB trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HDB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs IBN Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while IBN trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check IBN's competition here
NYCB-PA vs MFG Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while MFG trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check MFG's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ITUB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ITUB trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ITUB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs PNC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while PNC trades at $200.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check PNC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check USB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs LYG Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while LYG trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check LYG's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB-PP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PP trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check USB-PP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB-PS Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NYCB-PA has daily volatility of 2.11 and USB-PS has daily volatility of N/A.Check USB-PS's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB-PH Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PH trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check USB-PH's competition here
NYCB-PA vs DB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while DB trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check DB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs TFC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while TFC trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check TFC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BSBR Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BSBR trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BSBR's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BBD Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BBD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BBD's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HBANL Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HBANL trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HBANL's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HBANZ Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HBANZ trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HBANZ's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KB trades at $102.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BBDO Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BBDO trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BBDO's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HBANM Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HBANM trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HBANM's competition here
NYCB-PA vs MTB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while MTB trades at $198.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check MTB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FITB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FITB trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FITB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs SHG Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while SHG trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check SHG's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KEY-PL Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KEY-PL trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KEY-PL's competition here
NYCB-PA vs TFC-PO Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while TFC-PO trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check TFC-PO's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BAP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BAP trades at $332.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BAP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HBANP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HBANP trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HBANP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB-PR Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NYCB-PA has daily volatility of 2.11 and USB-PR has daily volatility of N/A.Check USB-PR's competition here
NYCB-PA vs TFC-PI Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while TFC-PI trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check TFC-PI's competition here
NYCB-PA vs TFC-PR Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while TFC-PR trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check TFC-PR's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CFG Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CFG trades at $56.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CFG's competition here
NYCB-PA vs USB-PQ Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while USB-PQ trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check USB-PQ's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FITBM Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FITBM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FITBM's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HBAN Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HBAN trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HBAN's competition here
NYCB-PA vs RF-PF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while RF-PF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NYCB-PA has daily volatility of 2.11 and RF-PF has daily volatility of N/A.Check RF-PF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KEY-PJ Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FCNCN Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FCNCN trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FCNCN's competition here
NYCB-PA vs RF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while RF trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check RF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FCNCA Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FCNCA trades at $1,766.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FCNCA's competition here
NYCB-PA vs RF-PC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while RF-PC trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check RF-PC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KEY Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KEY trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KEY's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KEY-PI Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KEY-PI trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KEY-PI's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BCH Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BCH trades at $38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BCH's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CIB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CIB trades at $68.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CIB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs KEY-PK Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while KEY-PK trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check KEY-PK's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FITBI Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FITBI trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FITBI's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FITBP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FITBP trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FITBP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs WF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while WF trades at $65.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check WF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs RF-PE Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while RF-PE trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check RF-PE's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CFG-PD Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CFG-PD's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BSAC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BSAC trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BSAC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs VLYPN Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while VLYPN trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check VLYPN's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FITBO Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FITBO trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FITBO's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN-PC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN-PC trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN-PC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN-PB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN-PB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CFG-PH Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CFG-PH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NYCB-PA has daily volatility of 2.11 and CFG-PH has daily volatility of N/A.Check CFG-PH's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN-PE Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN-PE trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN-PE's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CMA Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CMA's competition here
NYCB-PA vs WBS Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while WBS trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check WBS's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN-PF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN-PF trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN-PF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs SSB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while SSB trades at $90.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check SSB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ONBPO Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ONBPO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ONBPO's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ONBPP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ONBPP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ONBPP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FHN-PD Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FHN-PD's competition here
NYCB-PA vs WTFC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while WTFC trades at $131.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check WTFC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BPOP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BPOP trades at $131.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BPOP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CFG-PE Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CFG-PE trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CFG-PE's competition here
NYCB-PA vs UMBF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while UMBF trades at $110.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check UMBF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ONB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ONB trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ONB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CFR Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CFR trades at $132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CFR's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ZION Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ZION trades at $53.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ZION's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CADE Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CADE's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CHYM Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CHYM trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CHYM's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BOKF Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BOKF trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BOKF's competition here
NYCB-PA vs WAL Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while WAL trades at $67.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check WAL's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BSMX Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BSMX's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CBSH Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CBSH trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CBSH's competition here
NYCB-PA vs SNV Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check SNV's competition here
NYCB-PA vs SNV-PD Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check SNV-PD's competition here
NYCB-PA vs VLY Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while VLY trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check VLY's competition here
NYCB-PA vs PB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while PB trades at $64.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check PB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs GGAL Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while GGAL trades at $40.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 55.22. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check GGAL's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CUBI-PE Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
NYCB-PA vs PNFP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while PNFP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NYCB-PA has daily volatility of 2.11 and PNFP has daily volatility of N/A.Check PNFP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs COLB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while COLB trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check COLB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs CBC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while CBC trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check CBC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FNB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FNB trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FNB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs GBCI Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while GBCI trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check GBCI's competition here
NYCB-PA vs UBSI Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while UBSI trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check UBSI's competition here
NYCB-PA vs VLYPO Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while VLYPO trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check VLYPO's competition here
NYCB-PA vs VLYPP Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while VLYPP trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check VLYPP's competition here
NYCB-PA vs BXS Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check BXS's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HOMB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HOMB trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HOMB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs FLG Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while FLG trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check FLG's competition here
NYCB-PA vs ABCB Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while ABCB trades at $75.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check ABCB's competition here
NYCB-PA vs IFS Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while IFS trades at $46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check IFS's competition here
NYCB-PA vs HWC Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while HWC trades at $62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check HWC's competition here
NYCB-PA vs OZK Comparison March 2026
NYCB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYCB-PA stands at 5B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYCB-PA is priced at $21.28, while OZK trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYCB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.46, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, NYCB-PA's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYCB-PA is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYCB-PA.Check OZK's competition here