NextEra Energy, Inc.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 137.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NEE-PN trades at $22.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SOJE trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 100.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SO trades at $91.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 100.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SOJC trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SOJD trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DUK trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 94.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DUKB trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 93.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DUK-PA trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 79.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NEE-PR trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NGGTF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NGG trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AEP trades at $107.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SREA trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EXC trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while D trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while XEL trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ED trades at $110.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PEG trades at $79.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE and PCG have similar daily volatility (2.33).

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ELC trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ETR trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while WEC trades at $109.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ELEZY trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTE trades at $137.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTG trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTB trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTW trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NSARO trades at $76.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AEE trades at $99.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PPL trades at $36.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NSARP trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while FE trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while FTS trades at $49.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HRNNF trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMS trades at $73.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMSA trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CLPHY trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMSD trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ES trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMSC trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CLPHF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EIX trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while TERRF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AQNB trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILIO trades at $67.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while TNABF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EBR-B trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EBR trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while TNABY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CKISF trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CKISY trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EVRG trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while LNT trades at $61.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EMRAF trades at $43.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while KEP trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PNW trades at $93.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while RDEIY trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ELIAF trades at $92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPCO trades at $90.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while OGE trades at $45.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EQUEY trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPEO trades at $74.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPEP trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while FORFF trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while TEZNY trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPEM trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMS-PB trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IDA trades at $116.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EGIEY trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PA trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IESFY trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ENIC trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PB trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CMS-PC trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while TXNM trades at $52.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PC trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PE trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PD trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while POR trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCG-PG trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while OKLO trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -38.78. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while WELPM trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while WELPP trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILLM trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILLN trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILIN trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWLM trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILLP trades at $65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CEPU trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EDN trades at $30.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ETI-P trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 979.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EAI trades at $20.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 644.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CUPUF trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while RELFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 424.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while GNE trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 312.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLPL trades at $51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 311.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNTHP trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ABZPY trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNTHN trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 232.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWEN trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLHP trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 229.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWEL trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 208.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWLN trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 204.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while GPJA trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLTN trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 188.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLHN trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ENO trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EMP trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ENJ trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 91.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while VIASP trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while SUME trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while MCPB trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EUSP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 722498.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while RIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while USWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while RENU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWLL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWLL trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ALP-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, CNP-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AEPPZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IPWLO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IPWLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PCGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, HAWLI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while HAWLI trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, BANGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while BANGN trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ENIA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NMPWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NMPWP trades at $56.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IPWLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, PNMXO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, AILIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while AILIP trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, DCUE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, EVSO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while EVSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NEE-PP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, ENIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NEWEN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IPWLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, IPLDP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.

NEE plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE stands at 136.95B. In comparison, NEE-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE is priced at $66.53, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE.