Noodles & Company
Noodles & Company NDLS Peers
See (NDLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDLS | $0.80 | +6.67% | 36.8M | -0.93 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| MCD | $311.58 | -0.26% | 222.8B | 27.48 | $11.34 | +2.23% |
| SBUX | $88.11 | +1.74% | 100.1B | 32.04 | $2.75 | +2.72% |
| CMG | $52.16 | +4.17% | 70.3B | 46.16 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $144.04 | +0.05% | 40B | 28.69 | $5.02 | +1.91% |
| DRI | $216.25 | -0.44% | 25.3B | 24.38 | $8.87 | +2.58% |
| QSR | $71.54 | -0.26% | 23.4B | 24.25 | $2.95 | +3.29% |
| YUMC | $42.87 | -1.21% | 16B | 17.94 | $2.39 | +1.87% |
| DPZ | $465.91 | +0.30% | 16B | 26.73 | $17.43 | +1.34% |
| TXRH | $195.10 | -0.42% | 12.9B | 30.11 | $6.48 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
NDLS vs MCD Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while MCD trades at $311.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs SBUX Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while SBUX trades at $88.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CMG Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CMG trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 46.16. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs YUM Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while YUM trades at $144.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs DRI Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while DRI trades at $216.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs QSR Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while QSR trades at $71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs YUMC Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while YUMC trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs DPZ Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while DPZ trades at $465.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs TXRH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while TXRH trades at $195.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BROS Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BROS trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 185.54. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs WING Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while WING trades at $365.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 61.24. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CAVA Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CAVA trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 68.37. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs EAT Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while EAT trades at $173.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs SHAK Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while SHAK trades at $126.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 437.79. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CAKE Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CAKE trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs WEN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while WEN trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs SG Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while SG trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs ARCO Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while ARCO trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs PZZA Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while PZZA trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs HDL Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while HDL trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CBRL Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CBRL trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CNNE Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CNNE trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BJRI Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 993.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BJRI trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 46.81. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FWRG Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 949.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FWRG trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 91.53. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs KRUS Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 934.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while KRUS trades at $77.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -84.06. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs TWNPV Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 799.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BH trades at $260.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BH-A Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BH-A trades at $1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs PTLO Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while PTLO trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs RUTH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BLMN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 670.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BLMN trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CHUY Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs TAST Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs NATH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 432.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while NATH trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs DIN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while DIN trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs JACK Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 382.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while JACK trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs RICK Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while RICK trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 47.26. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs VENU Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while VENU trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs PBPB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while PBPB trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs LOCO Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while LOCO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FRGI Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs TWNP Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while TWNP trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs DENN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while DENN trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BBQ Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs RRGB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while RRGB trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs STKS Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while STKS trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs THCHW Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs THCH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while THCH trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs MB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while MB trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BDL Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BDL trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs GRIL Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FATAV Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FATBP Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FATBP trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FATBW Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FATBW trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FAT Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FAT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs RAVE Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while RAVE trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs ARKR Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while ARKR trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FATBB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FATBB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs MYT Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs GENK Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while GENK trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -106.87. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs YOSH Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while YOSH trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs GTIM Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while GTIM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs PC Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while PC trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs REBN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while REBN trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs CHSN Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while CHSN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BTBD Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BTBD trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BTBDW Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BTBDW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BTB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs FATBV Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs PNST Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while PNST trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BFI Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs BFIIW Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs ONDR Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.
NDLS vs LUB Comparison
NDLS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NDLS stands at 36.8M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NDLS is priced at $0.80, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NDLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NDLS's ROE is +5.88%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NDLS is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NDLS.