MasTec, Inc.
MasTec, Inc. MTZ Peers
See (MTZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | $171.30 | +1.62% | 13.5B | 62.48 | $2.73 | N/A |
| PWR | $379.94 | +1.57% | 56.2B | 61.02 | $6.22 | +0.10% |
| EME | $529.25 | +5.31% | 22.9B | 22.62 | $22.60 | +0.20% |
| FIX | $531.72 | +4.75% | 18.2B | 31.03 | $16.64 | +0.29% |
| J | $129.97 | +1.49% | 15.5B | 42.76 | $3.03 | +0.90% |
| ACM | $112.81 | +1.58% | 14.8B | 24.03 | $4.67 | +0.86% |
| APG | $50.79 | +1.11% | 13.9B | 82.56 | $0.61 | N/A |
| STN | $109.20 | +2.07% | 12.3B | 43.66 | $2.48 | +0.57% |
| TTEK | $36.02 | +0.08% | 9.5B | 52.25 | $0.69 | +0.67% |
| BLD | $325.78 | +1.98% | 9.2B | 16.28 | $19.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTZ vs PWR Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while PWR trades at $379.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 61.02. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs EME Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while EME trades at $529.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs FIX Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while FIX trades at $531.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs J Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while J trades at $129.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas J's P/E ratio is 42.76. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ACM Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ACM trades at $112.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs APG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while APG trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 82.56. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs STN Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while STN trades at $109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs TTEK Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while TTEK trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs BLD Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while BLD trades at $325.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs FLR Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while FLR trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs STRL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while STRL trades at $231.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs DY Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while DY trades at $243.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs KBR Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while KBR trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ROAD Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ROAD trades at $109.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 93.18. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs IESC Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while IESC trades at $289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs PRIM Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while PRIM trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs GVA Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while GVA trades at $92.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ECG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ECG trades at $63.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs AGX Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while AGX trades at $219.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs MYRG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while MYRG trades at $182.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs TPC Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while TPC trades at $46.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs LMB Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while LMB trades at $140.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs NVEE Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while NVEE trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs WLDN Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while WLDN trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs AMRC Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 819.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while AMRC trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs GLDD Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while GLDD trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs BWMN Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 494.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while BWMN trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 168.76. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs MTRX Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while MTRX trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ORN Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ORN trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 90.40. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SKBL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SKBL trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 410.33. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs BBCP Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while BBCP trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs RITR Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while RITR trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 47.88. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs JUNE Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while JUNE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SLND Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SLND trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs AENZ Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs MIMI Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while MIMI trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 231.67. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ESOA Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ESOA trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs CSLRW Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs OEG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs BLNK Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while BLNK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs VATE Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while VATE trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs MSW Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while MSW trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ONEG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ONEG trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SHIM Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SHIM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs AGFY Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while AGFY trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs DRTT Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs PGHL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs WXM Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while WXM trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SKK Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SKK trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs FGL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while FGL trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs WLMS Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs FBGL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while FBGL trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs ENG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SUNE Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SUNE trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs OIG Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs WLGS Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs SCCI Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MTZ has daily volatility of 2.52 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.
MTZ vs ATCX Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while ATCX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs IEA Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.
MTZ vs HIL Comparison
MTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTZ stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTZ is priced at $171.30, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.48, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTZ is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTZ.