Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRTN | $17.88 | -1.19% | 1.5B | 100.17 | $0.18 | +1.32% |
| ODFL | $238.65 | -3.38% | 51.7B | 51.93 | $4.79 | +0.46% |
| TFII | $153.58 | -5.99% | 13.1B | 44.37 | $3.59 | +1.15% |
| KNX | $79.82 | -1.11% | 13.1B | 382.52 | $0.21 | +0.94% |
| SAIA | $470.20 | -2.18% | 12.8B | 50.40 | $9.51 | N/A |
| SNDR | $37.52 | -3.20% | 6.7B | 67.88 | $0.56 | +1.01% |
| RXO | $29.01 | +3.33% | 4.8B | -46.94 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ARCB | $168.27 | +1.23% | 3.9B | 71.28 | $2.43 | +0.28% |
| WERN | $42.81 | -3.82% | 2.6B | -290.00 | -$0.15 | +1.28% |
| HTLD | $15.95 | -1.42% | 1.2B | -29.11 | -$0.55 | +0.50% |
Stock Comparison
MRTN vs ODFL Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while ODFL trades at $238.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 51.93. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check ODFL's competition here
MRTN vs TFII Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while TFII trades at $153.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check TFII's competition here
MRTN vs KNX Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while KNX trades at $79.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 382.52. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check KNX's competition here
MRTN vs SAIA Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while SAIA trades at $470.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check SAIA's competition here
MRTN vs SNDR Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while SNDR trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check SNDR's competition here
MRTN vs RXO Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while RXO trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -46.94. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check RXO's competition here
MRTN vs ARCB Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while ARCB trades at $168.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 71.28. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check ARCB's competition here
MRTN vs WERN Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while WERN trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -290.00. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check WERN's competition here
MRTN vs HTLD Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while HTLD trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check HTLD's competition here
MRTN vs CVLG Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while CVLG trades at $45.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 499.56. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check CVLG's competition here
MRTN vs ULH Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while ULH trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check ULH's competition here
MRTN vs PTSI Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check PTSI's competition here
MRTN vs DSKE Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check DSKE's competition here
MRTN vs USX Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check USX's competition here
MRTN vs PAMT Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while PAMT trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check PAMT's competition here
MRTN vs PATI Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check PATI's competition here
MRTN vs TSP Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check TSP's competition here
MRTN vs YELL Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check YELL's competition here
MRTN vs BEST Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check BEST's competition here
MRTN vs SLGB Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while SLGB trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check SLGB's competition here
MRTN vs TOPP Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while TOPP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check TOPP's competition here
MRTN vs ETS Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ETS has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while ETS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas ETS's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ETS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to ETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check ETS's competition here
MRTN vs HXHX Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while HXHX trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check HXHX's competition here
MRTN vs YGMZ Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check YGMZ's competition here
MRTN vs DSKEW Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check DSKEW's competition here
MRTN vs AXPW Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is less volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check AXPW's competition here
MRTN vs USAK Comparison June 2026
MRTN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRTN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRTN is priced at $17.88, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRTN currently has a P/E ratio of 100.17, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, MRTN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRTN is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRTN.Check USAK's competition here