Elite Express Holding Inc.
Elite Express Holding Inc. (ETS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ETS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETS | $0.53 | +4.95% | 8.9M | -4.08 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| ODFL | $209.83 | +2.63% | 43.6B | 43.90 | $4.78 | +0.54% |
| SAIA | $466.47 | +3.90% | 12.4B | 48.95 | $9.53 | N/A |
| TFII | $146.82 | +4.45% | 12.1B | 40.89 | $3.59 | +1.26% |
| KNX | $71.00 | +3.85% | 11.5B | 338.24 | $0.21 | +1.04% |
| SNDR | $33.60 | +4.48% | 5.9B | 60.04 | $0.56 | +1.15% |
| RXO | $23.85 | +12.87% | 3.9B | -38.45 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ARCB | $125.03 | +5.33% | 2.8B | 51.13 | $2.44 | +0.39% |
| WERN | $39.97 | +5.82% | 2.4B | -266.47 | -$0.15 | +1.41% |
| MRTN | $16.40 | +1.67% | 1.3B | 91.11 | $0.18 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
ETS vs ODFL Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while ODFL trades at $209.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ODFL's competition here
ETS vs SAIA Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while SAIA trades at $466.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 48.95. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SAIA's competition here
ETS vs TFII Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while TFII trades at $146.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TFII's competition here
ETS vs KNX Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while KNX trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 338.24. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check KNX's competition here
ETS vs SNDR Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while SNDR trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SNDR's competition here
ETS vs RXO Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while RXO trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -38.45. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check RXO's competition here
ETS vs ARCB Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while ARCB trades at $125.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ARCB's competition here
ETS vs WERN Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while WERN trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -266.47. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check WERN's competition here
ETS vs MRTN Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while MRTN trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 91.11. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check MRTN's competition here
ETS vs HTLD Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while HTLD trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -25.51. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HTLD's competition here
ETS vs CVLG Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 925.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while CVLG trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 408.89. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check CVLG's competition here
ETS vs PTSI Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PTSI's competition here
ETS vs DSKE Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKE's competition here
ETS vs ULH Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 371.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while ULH trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ULH's competition here
ETS vs USX Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USX's competition here
ETS vs PAMT Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while PAMT trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PAMT's competition here
ETS vs PATI Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PATI's competition here
ETS vs TSP Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TSP's competition here
ETS vs YELL Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YELL's competition here
ETS vs BEST Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check BEST's competition here
ETS vs SLGB Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while SLGB trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SLGB's competition here
ETS vs TOPP Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while TOPP trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TOPP's competition here
ETS vs HXHX Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while HXHX trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HXHX's competition here
ETS vs YGMZ Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 21.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YGMZ's competition here
ETS vs DSKEW Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKEW's competition here
ETS vs USAK Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USAK's competition here
ETS vs AXPW Comparison May 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 8.9M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.53, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check AXPW's competition here