Elite Express Holding Inc. (ETS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ETS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETS | $0.95 | +11.82% | 16.3M | -8.11 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| ODFL | $217.35 | +0.35% | 45.3B | 45.60 | $4.78 | +0.52% |
| KNX | $76.21 | -2.13% | 12.6B | 72.32 | $1.07 | +0.98% |
| TFII | $138.60 | -3.46% | 11.6B | 32.78 | $4.32 | +1.30% |
| SAIA | $412.21 | -2.13% | 11.2B | 45.90 | $9.11 | N/A |
| SNDR | $35.60 | -2.56% | 6.4B | 62.76 | $0.58 | +1.06% |
| RXO | $26.68 | -3.30% | 4.6B | -252.14 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| ARCB | $138.43 | -3.56% | 3.1B | 39.95 | $3.50 | +0.34% |
| WERN | $42.56 | -2.42% | 2.6B | 292.13 | $0.15 | +1.27% |
| MRTN | $17.28 | -0.38% | 1.4B | 91.84 | $0.19 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
ETS vs ODFL Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while ODFL trades at $217.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 45.60. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ODFL's competition here
ETS vs KNX Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while KNX trades at $76.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 72.32. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check KNX's competition here
ETS vs TFII Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while TFII trades at $138.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TFII's competition here
ETS vs SAIA Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while SAIA trades at $412.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 45.90. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SAIA's competition here
ETS vs SNDR Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while SNDR trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 62.76. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SNDR's competition here
ETS vs RXO Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while RXO trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -252.14. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check RXO's competition here
ETS vs ARCB Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while ARCB trades at $138.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ARCB's competition here
ETS vs WERN Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while WERN trades at $42.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is 292.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check WERN's competition here
ETS vs MRTN Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while MRTN trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 91.84. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check MRTN's competition here
ETS vs HTLD Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while HTLD trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -40.97. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HTLD's competition here
ETS vs CVLG Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while CVLG trades at $43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check CVLG's competition here
ETS vs PTSI Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PTSI's competition here
ETS vs ULH Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while ULH trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ULH's competition here
ETS vs DSKE Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKE's competition here
ETS vs USX Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USX's competition here
ETS vs PAMT Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 304.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while PAMT trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PAMT's competition here
ETS vs PATI Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PATI's competition here
ETS vs TSP Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TSP's competition here
ETS vs YELL Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YELL's competition here
ETS vs BEST Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check BEST's competition here
ETS vs SLGB Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while SLGB trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SLGB's competition here
ETS vs TOPP Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while TOPP trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TOPP's competition here
ETS vs HXHX Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while HXHX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HXHX's competition here
ETS vs ZDAI Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ZDAI has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while ZDAI trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas ZDAI's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZDAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to ZDAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ZDAI's competition here
ETS vs DSKEW Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKEW's competition here
ETS vs USAK Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USAK's competition here
ETS vs AXPW Comparison July 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 16.3M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.95, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -8.11, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check AXPW's competition here