TFI International Inc.
TFI International Inc. (TFII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TFII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFII | $138.33 | -0.43% | 11.4B | 37.19 | $3.72 | +1.33% |
| ODFL | $220.53 | +0.25% | 46B | 45.56 | $4.84 | +0.51% |
| SAIA | $444.32 | +0.42% | 11.9B | 46.65 | $9.53 | N/A |
| KNX | $64.69 | -0.78% | 10.5B | 308.00 | $0.21 | +1.13% |
| SNDR | $30.56 | +0.92% | 5.4B | 51.79 | $0.59 | +1.28% |
| RXO | $19.43 | +0.26% | 3.2B | -32.93 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| ARCB | $126.74 | +3.46% | 2.8B | 48.34 | $2.62 | +0.39% |
| WERN | $34.14 | +0.92% | 2B | -142.25 | -$0.24 | +1.66% |
| MRTN | $15.04 | +1.62% | 1.2B | 83.56 | $0.18 | +1.63% |
| HTLD | $13.27 | +1.84% | 1B | -19.79 | -$0.67 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
TFII vs ODFL Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while ODFL trades at $220.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check ODFL's competition here
TFII vs SAIA Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while SAIA trades at $444.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 46.65. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check SAIA's competition here
TFII vs KNX Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while KNX trades at $64.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 308.00. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check KNX's competition here
TFII vs SNDR Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while SNDR trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check SNDR's competition here
TFII vs RXO Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while RXO trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -32.93. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check RXO's competition here
TFII vs ARCB Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while ARCB trades at $126.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check ARCB's competition here
TFII vs WERN Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while WERN trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -142.25. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check WERN's competition here
TFII vs MRTN Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while MRTN trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 83.56. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check MRTN's competition here
TFII vs HTLD Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while HTLD trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -19.79. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check HTLD's competition here
TFII vs CVLG Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 878.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while CVLG trades at $34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 218.62. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check CVLG's competition here
TFII vs ULH Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while ULH trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check ULH's competition here
TFII vs PTSI Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check PTSI's competition here
TFII vs DSKE Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check DSKE's competition here
TFII vs USX Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check USX's competition here
TFII vs PAMT Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while PAMT trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check PAMT's competition here
TFII vs PATI Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check PATI's competition here
TFII vs TSP Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check TSP's competition here
TFII vs YELL Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check YELL's competition here
TFII vs BEST Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check BEST's competition here
TFII vs SLGB Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while SLGB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check SLGB's competition here
TFII vs TOPP Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while TOPP trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check TOPP's competition here
TFII vs ETS Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ETS has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while ETS trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas ETS's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ETS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to ETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check ETS's competition here
TFII vs HXHX Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while HXHX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check HXHX's competition here
TFII vs YGMZ Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 21.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check YGMZ's competition here
TFII vs AXPW Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check AXPW's competition here
TFII vs DSKEW Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check DSKEW's competition here
TFII vs USAK Comparison April 2026
TFII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFII stands at 11.4B. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TFII is priced at $138.33, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFII currently has a P/E ratio of 37.19, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, TFII's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TFII is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFII.Check USAK's competition here