Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc.
Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. (PATI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PATI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATI | $16.26 | +0.09% | 57.8M | 21.97 | $0.74 | N/A |
| ODFL | $204.46 | +0.16% | 42.5B | 42.68 | $4.79 | +0.55% |
| SAIA | $448.95 | -2.04% | 12B | 47.11 | $9.53 | N/A |
| TFII | $140.57 | -1.29% | 11.6B | 39.15 | $3.59 | +1.30% |
| KNX | $68.37 | -1.30% | 11.1B | 325.52 | $0.21 | +1.08% |
| SNDR | $32.16 | -0.65% | 5.6B | 57.45 | $0.56 | +1.19% |
| RXO | $21.13 | +10.63% | 3.5B | -34.13 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ARCB | $118.70 | -3.37% | 2.6B | 48.61 | $2.44 | +0.40% |
| WERN | $37.77 | -0.24% | 2.3B | -251.80 | -$0.15 | +1.46% |
| MRTN | $16.13 | +1.32% | 1.3B | 89.61 | $0.18 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
PATI vs ODFL Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ODFL trades at $204.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check ODFL's competition here
PATI vs SAIA Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while SAIA trades at $448.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 47.11. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check SAIA's competition here
PATI vs TFII Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TFII trades at $140.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check TFII's competition here
PATI vs KNX Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while KNX trades at $68.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 325.52. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check KNX's competition here
PATI vs SNDR Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while SNDR trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 57.45. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check SNDR's competition here
PATI vs RXO Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while RXO trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -34.13. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check RXO's competition here
PATI vs ARCB Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ARCB trades at $118.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check ARCB's competition here
PATI vs WERN Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while WERN trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -251.80. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check WERN's competition here
PATI vs MRTN Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while MRTN trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 89.61. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check MRTN's competition here
PATI vs HTLD Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while HTLD trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -25.36. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check HTLD's competition here
PATI vs CVLG Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 898.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while CVLG trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 396.67. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check CVLG's competition here
PATI vs PTSI Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check PTSI's competition here
PATI vs DSKE Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check DSKE's competition here
PATI vs ULH Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ULH trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check ULH's competition here
PATI vs USX Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check USX's competition here
PATI vs PAMT Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while PAMT trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check PAMT's competition here
PATI vs TSP Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check TSP's competition here
PATI vs YELL Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check YELL's competition here
PATI vs BEST Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check BEST's competition here
PATI vs SLGB Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while SLGB trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check SLGB's competition here
PATI vs TOPP Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TOPP trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check TOPP's competition here
PATI vs ETS Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ETS has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ETS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ETS's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check ETS's competition here
PATI vs HXHX Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while HXHX trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check HXHX's competition here
PATI vs YGMZ Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 21.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check YGMZ's competition here
PATI vs DSKEW Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check DSKEW's competition here
PATI vs USAK Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check USAK's competition here
PATI vs AXPW Comparison May 2026
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.Check AXPW's competition here