MPDL Ltd.
MPDL Ltd. (MPDL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MPDL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPDL.BO | ₹36.45 | -10.00% | 270.2M | -3.93 | -₹9.27 | N/A |
| LT.BO | ₹3,926.85 | -0.03% | 5.4T | 30.70 | ₹127.91 | +0.97% |
| LT.NS | ₹3,926.60 | -0.05% | 5.4T | 33.58 | ₹116.93 | +0.97% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹271.15 | +0.22% | 565.4B | 49.12 | ₹5.52 | +1.00% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹271.10 | +0.13% | 565.2B | 49.11 | ₹5.52 | +1.00% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹94.82 | +1.88% | 256B | 39.18 | ₹2.42 | +0.72% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹94.78 | +1.86% | 255.9B | 39.17 | ₹2.42 | +0.72% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,267.60 | -0.60% | 216.5B | 20.80 | ₹60.95 | +0.71% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,267.50 | -0.73% | 216.5B | 20.80 | ₹60.93 | +0.71% |
| TECHNOE.NS | ₹1,334.50 | +3.11% | 155.2B | 33.02 | ₹40.41 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
MPDL.BO vs LT.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while LT.BO trades at ₹3,926.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check LT.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs LT.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while LT.NS trades at ₹3,926.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check LT.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RVNL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 565.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹271.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.12. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RVNL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 565.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹271.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs NBCC.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 256B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹94.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs NBCC.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹94.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,267.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,267.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,334.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,333.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹862.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 147.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹859.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹859.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs IRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹140.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs IRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹140.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KEC.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KEC.BO trades at ₹485.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KEC.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KEC.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KEC.NS trades at ₹485.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KEC.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹215.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs AFCONS.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹300.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RITES.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RITES.BO trades at ₹203.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RITES.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RITES.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RITES.NS trades at ₹203.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RITES.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs NCC.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while NCC.NS trades at ₹146.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check NCC.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs NCC.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while NCC.BO trades at ₹146.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check NCC.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹939.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹939.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,994.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 83.97. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,994.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 83.54. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,545.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,544.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹390.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 138.39. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹390.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs DBL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while DBL.NS trades at ₹429.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check DBL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs DBL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while DBL.BO trades at ₹429.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check DBL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs WELENT.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹505.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs WELENT.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹505.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹507.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹507.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹138.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹138.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹343.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹216.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹215.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹807.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹806.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GVPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹731.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GVPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹731.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹118.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹118.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs HCC.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while HCC.NS trades at ₹20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check HCC.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹599.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹599.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs BONDADA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹347.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ORIANA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹1,896.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs HCC.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while HCC.BO trades at ₹20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check HCC.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KNRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹132.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KNRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs JKIL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹487.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs JKIL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹487.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹123.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹123.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs EIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹186.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RAMKY.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹438.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs RAMKY.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹437.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹763.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 73.36. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹763.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 73.61. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹1,065.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -44.39. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹1,064.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -44.48. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,750.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PATELENG.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs PATELENG.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs KPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹359.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GEPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GEPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹297.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹295.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,588.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,585.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹217.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹216.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹324.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹323.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹216.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹216.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs MBEL.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹293.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹314.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹313.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹910.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹206.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹206.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs CFF.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while CFF.BO trades at ₹759.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 39.83. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check CFF.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GARUDA.BO Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹170.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
MPDL.BO vs GARUDA.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹169.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
MPDL.BO vs WALCHANNAG.NS Comparison May 2026
MPDL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPDL.BO stands at 270.2M. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPDL.BO is priced at ₹36.45, while WALCHANNAG.NS trades at ₹231.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.93, whereas WALCHANNAG.NS's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, MPDL.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WALCHANNAG.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPDL.BO is more volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPDL.BO.Check WALCHANNAG.NS's competition here