Manulife Financial Corporation

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while AFL trades at $105.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MET trades at $80.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MET-PE trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MET-PA trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while PRU trades at $107.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while PRH trades at $24.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while PRS trades at $23.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while PUK trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while UNM trades at $80.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MET-PF trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while GL trades at $124.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while GL-PD trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while PRI trades at $273.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while JXN trades at $88.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.67. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while LNC trades at $34.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while LNC-PD trades at $26.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while AEL trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while FG trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while FGN trades at $25.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while CNO trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while GNW trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHFAL trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHFAP trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHF trades at $53.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while NWLI trades at $499.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while JXN-PA trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MHNC trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHFAO trades at $19.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 860M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHFAN trades at $14.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 760.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while BHFAM trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while ABLLW trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 506.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while ABL trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 497.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while ABLLL trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while CIA trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while VERY trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while MDWT trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while AAME trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while GWGH trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while IHC trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.

MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 54.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.96, while LFC trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.58, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.