Manulife Financial Corporation
Manulife Financial Corporation MFC Peers
See (MFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFC | $30.80 | +0.95% | 52.8B | 15.88 | $1.94 | +3.99% |
| AFL | $102.70 | +1.56% | 55.5B | 15.97 | $6.43 | +2.11% |
| MET | $77.51 | +1.55% | 52B | 12.66 | $6.12 | +2.85% |
| MET-PE | $23.97 | -0.04% | 51.2B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +2.85% |
| MET-PA | $23.96 | -0.21% | 51.1B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +2.85% |
| PRS | $24.07 | +0.04% | 37.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.84% |
| PRU | $104.22 | +2.07% | 36.9B | 16.44 | $6.34 | +5.09% |
| PRH | $25.36 | +0.32% | 36.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| PUK | $24.91 | +0.69% | 32B | 14.83 | $1.68 | +1.86% |
| UNM | $80.48 | +0.89% | 14B | 9.49 | $8.48 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
MFC vs AFL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while AFL trades at $102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MET trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PE Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MET-PE trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MET-PA trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRS Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while PRS trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRU Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while PRU trades at $104.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRH Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while PRH trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PUK Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while PUK trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs UNM Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while UNM trades at $80.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PF Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MET-PF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while GL trades at $122.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GL-PD Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while GL-PD trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRI Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while PRI trades at $266.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs JXN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while JXN trades at $88.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.09. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LNC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while LNC trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LNC-PD Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while LNC-PD trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs FG Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while FG trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs FGN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while FGN trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs CNO Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while CNO trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GNW Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while GNW trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHF Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHF trades at $50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHFAL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAP Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHFAP trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs JXN-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while JXN-PA trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL-PB Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs NWLI Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MHNC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MHNC trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAO Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 894.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHFAO trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 710.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHFAN trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAM Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 617.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while BHFAM trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABLLW Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while ABLLW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while ABL trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABLLL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while ABLLL trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs CIA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while CIA trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs VERY Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MDWT Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AAME Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while AAME trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs IHC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LFC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GWGH Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 52.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $30.80, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.88, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.