Manulife Financial Corporation
Manulife Financial Corporation MFC Peers
See (MFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFC | $31.18 | +1.22% | 53.7B | 16.32 | $1.92 | +3.93% |
| AFL | $102.39 | -0.30% | 55.6B | 16.00 | $6.43 | +2.11% |
| MET | $77.80 | +0.37% | 52.7B | 12.82 | $6.12 | +3.51% |
| MET-PA | $23.88 | -0.33% | 52.1B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.51% |
| MET-PE | $24.02 | +0.21% | 52B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.51% |
| PRU | $104.26 | +0.03% | 37.3B | 16.62 | $6.34 | +5.04% |
| PRH | $25.27 | -0.35% | 36.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.86% |
| PRS | $24.00 | -0.29% | 36.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.85% |
| PUK | $25.06 | +0.60% | 32.4B | 15.03 | $1.68 | +1.83% |
| UNM | $80.18 | -0.37% | 14.1B | 9.52 | $8.48 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
MFC vs AFL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while AFL trades at $102.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MET trades at $77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MET-PA trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PE Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MET-PE trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRU Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while PRU trades at $104.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRH Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while PRH trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRS Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while PRS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PUK Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while PUK trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs UNM Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while UNM trades at $80.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MET-PF Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MET-PF trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while GL trades at $125.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GL-PD Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while GL-PD trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs PRI Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while PRI trades at $265.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs JXN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while JXN trades at $88.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.82. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LNC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while LNC trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LNC-PD Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while LNC-PD trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs FG Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while FG trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs FGN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while FGN trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs CNO Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while CNO trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GNW Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while GNW trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHF Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHF trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAP Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHFAP trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHFAL trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs JXN-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while JXN-PA trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL-PB Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs NWLI Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AEL-PA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MHNC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MHNC trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAO Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 846.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHFAO trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAN Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHFAN trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs BHFAM Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 617.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while BHFAM trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while ABL trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABLLW Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while ABLLW trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs ABLLL Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while ABLLL trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs CIA Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while CIA trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs VERY Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs MDWT Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs AAME Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while AAME trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs IHC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs LFC Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.
MFC vs GWGH Comparison
MFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFC stands at 53.7B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MFC is priced at $31.18, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MFC is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFC.