MetLife, Inc.
MetLife, Inc. MET Peers
See (MET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET | $78.44 | +1.20% | 52.7B | 12.82 | $6.12 | +3.51% |
| AFL | $102.89 | +0.19% | 55.6B | 16.00 | $6.43 | +2.11% |
| MFC | $31.34 | +1.75% | 53.7B | 16.32 | $1.92 | +3.93% |
| MET-PA | $23.93 | -0.13% | 52.1B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.51% |
| MET-PE | $23.98 | +0.04% | 52B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +3.51% |
| PRU | $105.35 | +1.08% | 37.3B | 16.62 | $6.34 | +5.04% |
| PRH | $25.27 | -0.35% | 36.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.86% |
| PRS | $24.07 | +0.00% | 36.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.85% |
| PUK | $25.23 | +1.28% | 32.4B | 15.03 | $1.68 | +1.83% |
| UNM | $80.74 | +0.32% | 14.1B | 9.52 | $8.48 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
MET vs AFL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while AFL trades at $102.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MFC Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MFC trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MET-PA Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MET-PA trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MET-PE Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MET-PE trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs PRU Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while PRU trades at $105.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs PRH Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while PRH trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs PRS Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while PRS trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs PUK Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while PUK trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs UNM Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while UNM trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MET-PF Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MET-PF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs GL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while GL trades at $124.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs GL-PD Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while GL-PD trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs PRI Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while PRI trades at $267.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs JXN Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while JXN trades at $89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.82. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs LNC Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while LNC trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs LNC-PD Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while LNC-PD trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs AEL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs FG Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while FG trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs FGN Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while FGN trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs CNO Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while CNO trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs GNW Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while GNW trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHF Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHF trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHFAP Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHFAP trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHFAL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHFAL trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs JXN-PA Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while JXN-PA trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs AEL-PB Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs NWLI Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs AEL-PA Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MHNC Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MHNC trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHFAO Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 846.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHFAO trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHFAN Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHFAN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs BHFAM Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 617.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while BHFAM trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs ABL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while ABL trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs ABLLW Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while ABLLW trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs ABLLL Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while ABLLL trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs CIA Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while CIA trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs VERY Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs MDWT Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs AAME Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while AAME trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs IHC Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs LFC Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.
MET vs GWGH Comparison
MET plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET stands at 52.7B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET is priced at $78.44, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET currently has a P/E ratio of 12.82, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MET is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET.